Supreme Court rules against affirmative action at universities - Oh My God, And Affirmative Action is toast!

Article
Archive

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against race-conscious programs at universities, handing a win to a group that argued that the institutions shouldn’t consider race in evaluating applications for admission.

The high court, which has a conservative majority, had been expected to return a decision that wasn’t favorable for affirmative action.

The admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina that the court considered “cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority’s opinion, referring to a key clause in the U.S. Constitution.

“Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points. We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today.”

He was joined in the opinion by Justices Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas.
7qzf2n (1).jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Realistically it isn't happening, no matter what the supreme court has to say about it. They're not going to stop mandating race based selections the way they were before, they just won't admit to it. Nobody will enforce this because everybody knows it would cause an utter shitshow of racism accusations and rioting. Nobody is going to sue over it because the moment they do they are going to get publicly dogpiled as a racist and ruin their lives and career
It's precedent. They can sue over it, they have to enforce it, or it will get thrown out on appeals. Did you flunk high school civics or something?

But anyways, I know why you're mad. Anytime something good happens for white people, /pol/ niggers have to start crying about it. I don't know if you have a belief system where you're upset about something good happening for white people and then have to literal internet damage control saying, "No nothing good happened, you have to still be mad," maybe your dumb agenda actually doesn't benefit white people.

Again, this is SCOTUS precedent, acting like "it isn't happening," means you're wrong. It just happened. This is like claiming the abortion ruling can just be ignored, no it can't be. The buck stops at the SCOTUS as far as the law is concerned.
 
No. Black != Nigger.
Thomas is blac but not a nigger.
Ethan Ralph is not black but he is definitely a nigger.
Ethan Ralph is a wigger, not a nigger. I don't buy the "black people vs. niggers" dichotomy. However, I am prepared to declare Justice Clarence Thomas as the Head Nigger in Charge, or HNIC for short.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
It's precedent. They can sue over it, they have to enforce it, or it will get thrown out on appeals. Did you flunk high school civics or something?

But anyways, I know why you're mad. Anytime something good happens for white people, /pol/ niggers have to start crying about it. I don't know if you have a belief system where you're upset about something good happening for white people and then have to literal internet damage control saying, "No nothing good happened, you have to still be mad," maybe your dumb agenda actually doesn't benefit white people.

Again, this is SCOTUS precedent, acting like "it isn't happening," means you're wrong. It just happened. This is like claiming the abortion ruling can just be ignored, no it can't be. The buck stops at the SCOTUS as far as the law is concerned.
In other words you ignored everything I said. Go ahead and sue and see how that goes for you. Enjoy being publicly heralded as a racist by the left, getting fired, getting kicked out of school because of said racism accusations and making yourself unemployable. Not that you'd be able to prove they were doing anything they weren't supposed to anyway unless they explicitly admitted it, which they wouldn't

and if you think universities give a shit about precedent or anything that the supreme court says or any other court for that matter, that doesn't match their actions you're crazy. I'll say it again - nothing will change, they will simply not admit to doing it and good luck proving otherwise or suing for reasons already stated. They get away with doing illegal shit all the time
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: SBG and Mothra1988
It's precedent. They can sue over it, they have to enforce it, or it will get thrown out on appeals. Did you flunk high school civics or something?

But anyways, I know why you're mad. Anytime something good happens for white people, /pol/ niggers have to start crying about it. I don't know if you have a belief system where you're upset about something good happening for white people and then have to literal internet damage control saying, "No nothing good happened, you have to still be mad," maybe your dumb agenda actually doesn't benefit white people.

Again, this is SCOTUS precedent, acting like "it isn't happening," means you're wrong. It just happened. This is like claiming the abortion ruling can just be ignored, no it can't be. The buck stops at the SCOTUS as far as the law is concerned.
You're talking past each other, I think WonderWino is talking about "real world" practice. And the real world is corrupt. Sure, the SCOTUS can say it shouldn't happen, and you can take people to court to cite this ruling in the future--however, most people don't have the time or money to prove it, and that's just what these universities will do, try to find ways to get the "ideal" racial composition though the backdoor while making a legal case against them expensive and difficult to prove.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mewtwo_Rain
In other words you ignored everything I said. Go ahead and sue and see how that goes for you. Enjoy being publicly heralded as a racist by the left, getting fired, getting kicked out of school because of said racism accusations and making yourself unemployable. Not that you'd be able to prove they were doing anything they weren't supposed to anyway unless they explicitly admitted it, which they wouldn't

and if you think universities give a shit about precedent or anything that the supreme court says or any other court for that matter, that doesn't match their actions you're crazy. I'll say it again - nothing will change, they will simply not admit to doing it and good luck proving otherwise or suing for reasons already stated. They get away with doing illegal shit all the time
Literal schizo ramblings. It's SCOTUS precedent. It has to be followed whether you like or not. There is no fucking choice. The only way to reverse this is to do new precedent. How fucking long will that take? lol Cope and seethe that something good happened for whites for once.

You're talking past each other, I think WonderWino is talking about "real world" practice. And the real world is corrupt. Sure, the SCOTUS can say it shouldn't happen, and you can take people to court to cite this ruling in the future--however, most people don't have the time or money to prove it, and that's just what these universities will do, try to find ways to get the "ideal" racial composition though the backdoor while making a legal case against them expensive and difficult to prove.
Saying SCOTUS precednet doesn't matter is fucking bullshit. Did stuff change after the abortion ruling? Hell yeah it did, and the left is still flipping out over it. It has real world impact. Saying no one has the "time or money" to sue over stuff that is now illegal due to this ruling is ridiculous. The lawyers will jump all over this shit becuase it's an assured W due to the to precedent. Sure they can still try to wiggle their way out of it, but it will get BTFO in appeals.
 
You're talking past each other, I think WonderWino is talking about "real world" practice. And the real world is corrupt. Sure, the SCOTUS can say it shouldn't happen, and you can take people to court to cite this ruling in the future--however, most people don't have the time or money to prove it, and that's just what these universities will do, try to find ways to get the "ideal" racial composition though the backdoor while making a legal case against them expensive and difficult to prove.
Yeah Harvard has already stated they're going to use that loophole to let them still judge people on racial 'experiences' which pretty much means race will still be used. The people that will be enforcing the rules in universities are going to be whiny bitches and try bending the rules to suit their ideology which only a court order would stop, but how would that really play out? Someone goes to court to say someone's essay was judged more persuasive because they were black?

Harvard would obviously be going against the spirit of the SCOTUS ruling, but you'd still need to argue in the courts how that was the case.
 
Yeah Harvard has already stated they're going to use that loophole to let them still judge people on racial 'experiences' which pretty much means race will still be used. The people that will be enforcing the rules in universities are going to be whiny bitches and try bending the rules to suit their ideology which only a court order would stop, but how would that really play out? Someone goes to court to say someone's essay was judged more persuasive because they were black?

Harvard would obviously be going against the spirit of the SCOTUS ruling, but you'd still need to argue in the courts how that was the case.
Are you seriously suggesting Harvard trying to circumvent a SCOTUS ruling wouldn't be automatically challenged in court? "How would that really play out." I think there's pretty good evidence since they just got told that race can't be used as a criterion.

Edit: Your post has been directly shot down by the decision (saved from the other thread). LOL. No, I don't expect you to reply to this either.

5173598-4ecdeb0f037f56cbc77bd0cc86182097.png
 
Last edited:
Clown world has been heating up lately. LGBTQP+2+++ liberals openly being more anti-woman than even the most hardened blackpilled incel "bonus hole" "non-man" and now we get a pro-AA white woman claiming 0% of niggers are capable of getting into higher education on their own merits.
There was a white libtard on Twitter calling Thomas a nigger today. You can tell when their feathers are really ruffled. They go full mask off.
 
Are you seriously suggesting Harvard trying to circumvent a SCOTUS ruling wouldn't be automatically challenged in court? "How would that really play out." I think there's pretty good evidence since they just got told that race can't be used as a criterion.

Edit: Your post has been directly shot down by the decision (saved from the other thread). LOL. No, I don't expect you to reply to this either.

View attachment 5185313

It's pretty easy to reply with the SCOTUS decision that effectively grants a loophole to let them continue considering race. I'm not sure why you or anyone is convinced that Universities can't abuse this.
SCOTUS decision.png
 
It's pretty easy to reply with the SCOTUS decision that effectively grants a loophole to let them continue considering race. I'm not sure why you or anyone is convinced that Universities can't abuse this.
View attachment 5185338
Are your serious? Roberts literally rebuked your suggestion, and I just posted it. Okay, I'll repost it then:
5173598-4ecdeb0f037f56cbc77bd0cc86182097.png


Read the bolded part this time where he says it can't be used as a means to circumvent his opinion. What do you think is going to happen if Harvard literally does what it says they can't do? Yeah, that's not going to work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Collections Agent
Are your serious? Roberts literally rebuked your suggestion, and I just posted it. Okay, I'll repost it then:
View attachment 5185365

Read the bolded part this time where he says it can't be used as a means to circumvent his opinion. What do you think is going to happen if Harvard literally does what it says they can't do? Yeah, that's not going to work.
If nothing else, I think we can trust Roberts' ego in making sure he gets mad if anyone tries this and it lands in his court again.
 
Oh, we already have...
View attachment 5184618

She's already deleted that before I could get to it for archival, but if you go to her profile....

View attachment 5184620

Funny how she singles out the one black man on the Supreme Court.

She said the silent part out loud.

Let that hate out sweetheart. We know your love for the negro only goes as far as your ability to stand on their shoulders and look down on everyone else. Just come out and say you think niggers are lazy and stupid criminals who can't survive without the white man's help. We know you have it in you.

I have said it before but it needs repeating.
Racism is still alive today and it is pushed by white liberal women.

She genuinely believes that black people are inferior and can not compete with other races based on merit. This is KKK levels of racism.
And she still thinks she is the one that is not racist.

Ahahah I hope so. Love seeing liberal white and Asian women go insane. One that's getting astroturffed on Instagram on the moment is some leftist Asian who brafs about getting the brain damaged mongoloid John Fetterman elected.
Erica Marsh (related to Randy Marsh?) is, by her own extremist liberal activist journoscum mindset, nothing but a bonus hole...
Clown world has been heating up lately. LGBTQP+2+++ liberals openly being more anti-woman than even the most hardened blackpilled incel "bonus hole" "non-man" and now we get a pro-AA white woman claiming 0% of niggers are capable of getting into higher education on their own merits.
Damnit, I got semi-ninja'd. Still, I would love to see blue checkmark women freaking out about this (or frankly any lefty/woke thing on Twitter) called "bonus holes" en masse.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Punished Mitch
The picture is even more hilarious:

View attachment 5185612

Sadly the SC left a cut out (talking about your lived experience of racism) that all the big schools are gonna us. So fuck them, if your kids are slightly tanned put down Native American/Hispanic, what ever and lie, lie, lie.
Thanks for sharing that meme. Is there any others memes of the same kind? Btw, let's hope and I apologize if someone else already mentioned it, then it will also spread to the workforce as well.
 
I have said it before but it needs repeating.
Racism is still alive today and it is pushed by white liberal women.

She genuinely believes that black people are inferior and can not compete with other races based on merit. This is KKK levels of racism.
And she still thinks she is the one that is not racist.
This also goes for many mudsharks. They see black men as basically subhuman savages, and that makes fucking them taboo.
 
Back