Swedish Neo-nazis supporting Soleimani because ''muh aryanism'' by putting Iran flags in their bios on Twitter, surrendering to Islam in the process.

Overly Serious said:
Not to agree with Nazis or say their ideology is well thought out, but Aryan actually comes from the name Iran. It's the same root. And Hitler forged alliances with muslim groups. He despised Christianity and actually wrote that if the German people followed Islam rather than Christianity, the other nations wouldn't have been able to bring down the German people. I don't recall the exact quote but could dig it out. In any case, I don't know why people find it surprising to find a linking of such ideologies. Hitler quite respected the Japanese for example. Not because he wanted German and Japanese people to intermingle but because the Japanese had strong national and ethnic identity and defended it. People have a cartoonish idea of Hitler. He despised degeneracy and to him, for example, gypsies and Jews living amongst 'good, honest Germans' was a weakening of the solid German unity and identity. He's pretty much the archetypal racist but he wasn't a caricature. Fascism respects power and very little else. Just like BNP ultra-nationalists respected and even met with French National Front types back in the day. They'd cheerfully hate on each other's rival nations but at the same time recognized each other as kin.



Urgh! Well, the reply is correct. Iranians are Persians and not Arabs (barring the odd immigrant community). And Iranians are also White. Even Nazis are correct twice a year. Or something like that.
Click to expand...
Very interesting!
 
If i remember correctly there was some plans by members of the now defunct party NSF (NationalSocialistisk Front) to go down and fight in the second Iraq war on the Iraq side. I read this on flashback some years ago but they stayed at home as they were only offered civilian help duties by the iraqis.

Probably for the best (for themselves) considering how well the Iraq forces did that time...Not that i think the nazis would have done better either.

No idea how serious this actually were or how many really thought of doing it but ye...just a quick note of strange things ive heard.
 
Last edited:
Update: It now seems like Gays and Trannies are the same thing somehow.

1579212579178.png
 
GloriousRapeRabbit said:
If i remember correctly there was some plans by members of the now defunct party NSF (NationalSocialistisk Front) to go down and fight in the second Iraq war on the Iraq side. I read this on flashback some years ago but they stayed at home as they were only offered civilian help duties by the iraqis.

Probably for the best (for themselves) considering how well the Iraq forces did that time...Not that i think the nazis would have done better either.

No idea how serious this actually were or how many really thought of doing it but ye...just a quick note of strange things ive heard.
Click to expand...

Some neo-nazis jumped ship to extremist Islam because they had the raditude to get gruesome instead of pussying out and trying to get the popular vote like current neo-nazis. It was SvD or DN that had an article, many years ago, about a tatted up neo-nazi mother of small children that went full burqa because extreme Islamist had an actual output of snuff videos. They proved themselves to not be limp dick posers in her mind, I think. Hopefully the Kurdled have her in a hole if she ever went down there.
 
It's an open secret that a lot of Neonazis have a hard-on for Iran (even though they consider a lot of their policies as "too liberal"). Iran runs on the principle that everyone ultimately answers to a permanent, unelected supreme leader and his circle of advisors. If modern Neonazis managed to set up their own regime it would basically be Iran but with neopaganism instead of Islam.

Also IRGC = bootleg Waffen-SS.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Urist Steelthrone and Silence of the Troons
Lol you sound mad. Of course people who love their people from the Nordic countries support nationalist heroes like Soleimani, just as people who love their people from the Nordic countries assisted the Syrian government and allied forces in fighting the takfiris and their masters in Syria.

It turns out that they were capable of seeing the difference between well-tanned people who had no quarrel with them, and well-tanned people they did have a quarrel with (and who were only present in their countries because of their common enemies). Who would have thought?
1579337692923.png

I look forward to the Axis of Resistance being a global one.
 
  • Informative
  • Dumb
Reactions: ConfederateIrishman and Arctic Fox
I don't know where all the hate for muslims is coming from here. sure a lot of them are censorious faggots that can't handle artists drawing their prophet muhammad (piss be upon him) but most christcuck conservatives are no better, always trying to ban something they deem "degenerate". I welcome the inevitable islamic takeover of western civilization just so women can be second class citizens again, the way God intended.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Viridian, ConfederateIrishman, Overly Serious and 1 other person
Islam is a political as well as a religious system. The bible doesn't lay out how to subvert or run a state. Not big on Christianity myself but I vastly prefer it to a religion designed for global conquest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Overly Serious
Well, putting up and Iran flag in their bio is maybe too much, but Soleimani was not a Sunni, he actually played a pretty big role in defeating ISIS in Irak and Syria, and would probably consider the Muslims who flooded Sweden and acted like apes like vermin to be eradicated (many Sunni Arabs think that as well, especially in the country of origin of migrants, they feel ashamed of seeing that kind of shit), so it makes sense that anti-American, anti-Jewish Swedes would support him and the Iranian government.

However :

Overly Serious said:
And Iranians are also White.
Click to expand...

White means Ethnic European generally, the average Swede would probably confuse a Persian with an Arab. I guess they could be called Caucasian though, some (the US Census included IIRC) include North African and Middle Eastern (and Jewish) people into that category. But I don't see what would make an Iranian whiter than a Moroccan or an Iraqi. They have Aryan (not Nordic) roots, but so do Indians (Hinduism and Sanskrit are Aryan).
 
Sondermemehandlung said:
White means Ethnic European generally, the average Swede would probably confuse a Persian with an Arab. I guess they could be called Caucasian though, some (the US Census included IIRC) include North African and Middle Eastern (and Jewish) people into that category. But I don't see what would make an Iranian whiter than a Moroccan or an Iraqi. They have Aryan (not Nordic) roots, but so do Indians (Hinduism and Sanskrit are Aryan).
Click to expand...

Iranians might share roots with Indians but Indians are dark and Persians are no darker than Western Europeans. The odd one might be mistaken for an Arab (most likely because they also have some Arab ancestry) but the main reason someone might confuse a Persian for an Arab is because they see a hijab or generic Middle Eastern outfit and their mind goes Muslim = Arab.

I mean look at these not atypical Iranian women. I think if the average Western European saw any of these and there were no Islamic indicators, they'd be as likely to pick Spanish as Arab.

6238077644_42c27d0dfa_z.jpg
Beautiful Women in the Iran World (1).jpg
main-qimg-91a5e39ca622df8d91da1db6d20b707d.jpeg
main-qimg-b72bbdc72f08e2eb3e89bfaa257198fb.jpeg
main-qimg-bb22f203a339484bb02b644bb97a1f73.jpeg


Also a more extensive slideshow of Iranian women.

I look at these women and I don't think Arab. If I were guessing and got it wrong it would probably be because I guessed Turkish for some of them.

(They're all women because I like women, no other reason).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Silence of the Troons
93c6bfbcf323ffd68190e957b95ffe95.png


There is absolutely nothing aryan about scandinavia or "the north". During the proto-aryan migrations the strongest tribes claimed for themselves the best lands, and who got pushed and was forced to settle for the worst lands? The weakest bloodlines, likely already deficient thousands of years ago.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Silence of the Troons and Irwin M. Felcher
Oskar Dirlewanger said:
View attachment 1104073

There is absolutely nothing aryan about scandinavia or "the north". During the proto-aryan migrations the strongest tribes claimed for themselves the best lands, and who got pushed and was forced to settle for the worst lands? The weakest bloodlines, likely already deficient thousands of years ago.
Click to expand...

By that logic aryan people themselves are inferior to Africans who got to stay in Africa whilst the ancestors of Aryan peoples migrated outwards. Which might be what you're arguing it's just given your username I think you may not be. It also gets a bit confusing with examples such as East African peoples being a back migration of descendants of those who left coming back again and displacing the originals. Also, evolution doesn't just stop once populations diverge. They continue to change. I like your map though, that makes a good point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back