- Joined
- Sep 10, 2019
By that logic aryan people themselves are inferior to Africans who got to stay in Africa whilst the ancestors of Aryan peoples migrated outwards. Which might be what you're arguing it's just given your username I think you may not be. It also gets a bit confusing with examples such as East African peoples being a back migration of descendants of those who left coming back again and displacing the originals. Also, evolution doesn't just stop once populations diverge. They continue to change. I like your map though, that makes a good point.
North Africa is full of aryans, even Hitler claimed that Berbers are a "lost aryan tribe" etc. They probably settled there because it was nice, and didn't feel the need to travel further south where the climate gets too hot. Central african jungles and rainforests are useless for agriculture and pastoralism, not to mention a bothersome obstacle for a nomadic race travelling on horseback.
A prime example of a North African aryan specimen:
