Tabletop Roleplaying Games (D&D, Pathfinder, CoC, ETC.)

Yes. I use Dungeon Alchemist, which is available on Steam. You can just pick what sort of room you want it to make and select a grid and it'll create the room and furnish it, and you can then export the result for virtual tabletop use with walls and lighting pre-set. It's a little derpy sometimes in how it chooses to furnish a room, so you may need to do some manual tweaking here and there, but overall I'm really happy with it for cranking out decent-looking maps with low effort.
Thank you. I've decided to take over Engine Heart, starting by making some motherfucking maps because Viral didn't even include any in the official campaigns.

Does it do interior AND exterior maps? The latter shouldn't be AS challenging if it doesn't.

I'll be honest.

I use the roll20 map creator because I'm lazy.

But if you're looking for one to use in a different tabletop, I have no clue.
EH runs off modified Artifacer rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bruce Springsteen
Does it do interior AND exterior maps? The latter shouldn't be AS challenging if it doesn't.

Yes, if by 'exterior' you mean outdoors. The program's initial focus was clearly on interior dungeony things, since it's generating rooms drawn on a grid, but you can set up a base terrain like grass/sand and deposit plants and such around it and draw paths on it, so yeah. But what it doesn't do is set up an exterior view of a building. It shows the walls and doors but no roof. It's a requested feature, but at present people are just photoshopping roofs onto cottages to get that effect.

I've seen them; Do they have a "hand drawn" option for the graphics? I'm not usually big on 3-D renders, though I appreciate they aren't doing the plasticy Poser ones you'd see on Dunjinni forums.

Not that I've ever seen. There may be asset packs available that look hand drawn, but as far as I know it's all 3D, because the maps are actually 3D. You can pivot them around if you want an isometric perspective or whatever. I only do top-down so doesn't really make a difference to me.
 
Can someone recommend a good digital DnD map creator? My hand-drawing skills have always been ass.
I use DungeonDraft with other asset packs because the default art style kind of sucks. I can make some decent maps but I find the minutiae of placing each individual plate, cup and sausage on each table in an busy inn really relaxing but I can see why someone would rather have auto generating maps.

When I'm running Pokemon I use Tiled instead with stolen tile sets from mostly Platinum and B/W 2. The DD maps look better but the official Pokemon tiles get people in the Pokemon mood better.
 
20230112_182301.png


Paizo's acronym for their license is ORC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brain Problems
We can hope, but it won't. Wizards is owned by Hasbro, Wizards isn't even in Hasbro's top 10 divisions. The best outcome is corporate orders a house cleaning.
I don't know about revenue but WotC is Hasbro's most profitable division, and while that's more because of MtG then DnD it's not super lopsided IIRC. Hasbro's corpos are retarded and MtG fags are also recently pissed about them releasing a set of proxy Alpha reprints (so not actually legal for sanctioned play) for 1k USD for 4 random 15 card packs. Hasbro assumed they would sell out in minutes, they took the sale down after 20 minutes and are giving out most of the packs for free instead.
 
Can someone recommend a good digital DnD map creator? My hand-drawing skills have always been ass.
Wonderdraft for world maps, Dungeondraft for battlemaps are my go-tos. You can easily import additional assets and some big map makers regularly put out asset packs (e.g. Tom Cartos, Forgotten Adventures, 2-Minute Tabletop). Inkarnate is a decent online alternative as well.
 
Not that I've ever seen. There may be asset packs available that look hand drawn, but as far as I know it's all 3D, because the maps are actually 3D. You can pivot them around if you want an isometric perspective or whatever. I only do top-down so doesn't really make a difference to me.
I meant more like a filter you could apply like 'Sketch' in photoshop.


Wonderdraft for world maps, Dungeondraft for battlemaps are my go-tos. You can easily import additional assets and some big map makers regularly put out asset packs (e.g. Tom Cartos, Forgotten Adventures, 2-Minute Tabletop). Inkarnate is a decent online alternative as well.
I will shill for Two Minute Table Top. they have lots of free asset packs, and I've paid out for their all-access - it wasn't cheap but its a lot of stuff. The Art is good, and the assets are multi-use.

Honestly my major issue with it with as been there being so much shit, its hard to sift.

Inkarnate's free teir is limited but their assets are nice.
Another thing that might matter for @Cpt. Stud Beefpile since he's reviving a system, is that (please double check) Inkarnate allows you to use their maps in commercial projects.
I've got a huge library of assets, but 80% of questionable providence, definitely wouldn't want to use them in even a free document.

I don't know about revenue but WotC is Hasbro's most profitable division, and while that's more because of MtG then DnD it's not super lopsided IIRC. Hasbro's corpos are retarded and MtG fags are also recently pissed about them releasing a set of proxy Alpha reprints (so not actually legal for sanctioned play) for 1k USD for 4 random 15 card packs. Hasbro assumed they would sell out in minutes, they took the sale down after 20 minutes and are giving out most of the packs for free instead.
Margins might be high, but the raw income isn't super high IIRC.
 
The outflux from DnD is pretty funny. I play Pathfinder with someone who mods the Plebbit subreddit and they said that they had 100+ people join their Discord today alone after Paizo announced their own OGL. Paizo decided to hire Azora Law which was co-founded by Brian Lewis who helped create the original DnD OGL to help make it "open, perpetual, and irrevocable". Glad to see them taking advantage of WotC's misstep once again.
 
The outflux from DnD is pretty funny. I play Pathfinder with someone who mods the Plebbit subreddit and they said that they had 100+ people join their Discord today alone after Paizo announced their own OGL. Paizo decided to hire Azora Law which was co-founded by Brian Lewis who helped create the original DnD OGL to help make it "open, perpetual, and irrevocable". Glad to see them taking advantage of WotC's misstep once again.
Unless Paizo massively missteps here, they are going to eat WotC's lunch. I'll give them credit; they've made a lot of dumb decisions and virtue signals, but they've been smart enough to read the room on this one and jump on WotC's balls while they're down.

Here's a fun bit too: Kobold Press 'raised the black flag' in opposition to WotC's OGL revision. They commented on it in a tweet. Guess who liked and retweeted said declaration? Critical Role.

Virtue signaling? Maybe. Or a shot across the bow to WotC. Having CR punch out would be comedy gold. Guess we'll have to wait and see what happens.
 
Buy graph paper nigger!

Shit. I forgot this isn't the '80s anymore.
Honestly, I've yet to meet anyone who actually misses graph paper and reading each other's written/erased/rewritten smeared-pencil hieroglyphics.

And virtual table tops, unfortunately, are becoming the only realistic way to get a group together when nearly everyone needs 2 jobs to make ends meet.
 
Unless Paizo massively missteps here, they are going to eat WotC's lunch. I'll give them credit; they've made a lot of dumb decisions and virtue signals, but they've been smart enough to read the room on this one and jump on WotC's balls while they're down.

Here's a fun bit too: Kobold Press 'raised the black flag' in opposition to WotC's OGL revision. They commented on it in a tweet. Guess who liked and retweeted said declaration? Critical Role.

Virtue signaling? Maybe. Or a shot across the bow to WotC. Having CR punch out would be comedy gold. Guess we'll have to wait and see what happens.
The signatories are also a bunch of wokies, and I'll lol when they put in the same "you can't use this license to make something that offends trannnies or reminds them they'll never be a real woman" butright now I'm loving seeing corporate shills getting destroyed and just enjoying it for what it is.
 
The signatories are also a bunch of wokies, and I'll lol when they put in the same "you can't use this license to make something that offends trannnies or reminds them they'll never be a real woman" butright now I'm loving seeing corporate shills getting destroyed and just enjoying it for what it is.
It looks like they're trying to have the license be untethered to any one controlling agency, so I don't see a way for anyone to try to enforce such a clause. I'm sure if it was technically feasible they would absolutely add such language, though. We can't have people on the wrong side of history making games, after all.
 
The outflux from DnD is pretty funny. I play Pathfinder with someone who mods the Plebbit subreddit and they said that they had 100+ people join their Discord today alone after Paizo announced their own OGL. Paizo decided to hire Azora Law which was co-founded by Brian Lewis who helped create the original DnD OGL to help make it "open, perpetual, and irrevocable". Glad to see them taking advantage of WotC's misstep once again.
it's even worse than that, people who never knew what paizo even is are suddenly looking into it.
just consider for a moment that a lot of 5e normies live in an ignorant "dnd=rpg" bubble, the second they become aware there's a whole world of other systems and companies outside it's impossible to put that genie back in the box - words travel fast, especially in nerd spaces, however normie they are. it's hilarious to watch them go "what do you mean the rules are free?!? why?" and other fun facts that simply don't exist or work differently under wotc. suddenly the people too lazy and uninformed to play anything else than dnd actually want to.

the other aspects is that the whole 1.1 kerfuffle also pissed off the DMs, which are usually lot more versed than the average player, and if they jump ship there's a good chance they take their players with them (since it's much more difficult to replace a DM just to keep running 5e). they're also usually the ones buying all books to run their games. so in one fell swoop wotc's little stunt cost them their existing paypiggies and the ones ones they were planning to milk.

gonna have to wait and see if it will stick, but now that everyone involved has an incentive to piss on wotc it's gonna be interesting what the longerm effects will be.

It looks like they're trying to have the license be untethered to any one controlling agency, so I don't see a way for anyone to try to enforce such a clause. I'm sure if it was technically feasible they would absolutely add such language, though. We can't have people on the wrong side of history making games, after all.
one argument I've read that the law firm in charge will probably try to avoid stuff like that to not constantly have to litigate for that shit.
terms like that are also usually tied to the brand with the excuse "we can fuck your for everything if we think would damage the brand", a general license divorced from any specific brand doesn't really have a use for that.

Margins might be high, but the raw income isn't super high IIRC.
here's one of the creators of the OGL going into it (towards the end):

I also like how a 50% royalty is "rape" when WotC does it, but "standard" when Paizo does it because they put all their monsters and class options in their SRD, not just the core ones.
nigga, the fuck you're even talking about? you look more retarded than the average drone right now, which is just pathetic since I know you're smarter than that going by your other posts.

all I got from your little hissy fit is that you never had to run avernus and the mess it is, so no need read your clueless hot takes.
 
Last edited:
I use DungeonDraft with other asset packs because the default art style kind of sucks. I can make some decent maps but I find the minutiae of placing each individual plate, cup and sausage on each table in an busy inn really relaxing but I can see why someone would rather have auto generating maps.

When I'm running Pokemon I use Tiled instead with stolen tile sets from mostly Platinum and B/W 2. The DD maps look better but the official Pokemon tiles get people in the Pokemon mood better.
I'll second DungeonDraft for battle maps. Do make full use of custom asset packs however because the default is extremely thin on variety. Also note you will definitely fight the editor when trying to design battlemaps with multiple z-levels, so bear that in mind.

I'll need to look up Wonderdraft. Inkarnate was "okay" but not a fan.
 
Back