Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

  • Happy Easter!
At least Gutfeld is a good type of a Stephen Colbert rip-off that doesn't focus on wokeism.
No. Gutfeld is painfully unfunny. His only claim to fame is that he is harmless and right wing. Which is why Fox gave him the show. Ryan Long on the other hand is ACTUALLY funny and would be better for it. But he's also not safe. Fox wants safe and harmless comedians.
 

Of course he has a fedora hat picture, the only thing he is missing is the stupid open mouth picture.
View attachment 3202486

Yeah I was gonna say, another shitlib, another soyjack. They're all bald with pube beards, glasses, and (for the most part) gaping mouths. Oh and overweight, they're all overweight.
 
Interesting. I was searching through her archived Tweets and found this. She said she filed charges against the antifa guy.
View attachment 3203198

She is also the author of this famous Tweet that made it's was around Reddit and other places back in 2019.View attachment 3203203
The AC thing is funny because anyone that knows anything about computer or electronics knows offices are kept cold to extend the life cycle of servers and computers since a majority of power goes to keeping those systems from overheating.
Gutfeld's schtick is supposed to be a conservative rip-off of Stephen Colbert, right? Because those jokes were painfully ham-fisted. Good grief.
Yeah, the only thing worse than his jokes are the sketches they do. Every once in a while he'll elicit a sensible chuckle but that's about it. His show is apparently very popular compared to other late night TV, supposedly number 2 in the time slot.

It does make me glad people who would otherwise be watching Colbert are hearing about how Taylor Lorenz is a hypocritical crybully.
Gutfeld was funnier when he was on 3am ET and had Bill Schultz to bully. Fox making him a mainstay ruined him.
The first point doesn't really matter, but the second point does, and is such an insane distortion of civil press protections that it borders on lunacy. Lorenz's defenders conveniently seem to forget that LoTT did not create any of their own content -- they used videos already publicly available and freely posted online by their creators. The reposts, since that is all they were, weren't even presented with commentary. Some here have been tempted to make the argument that Lorenz might be following orders or just being used as the hired gun in this case, and sure, that's probably true. But she's a reprehensible ghoul who goes after people's children. Prison rules always apply: don't go after kids.
The public figures bit is scary because they tried the same thing with Sandman, claiming he became an involuntary public figure when they all decided to write a story and lie about him so they can say even if they did lie about him he can't sue them because he's a public figure. They could claim anybody with a social media profile is a profile figure and thus be impossible to sue for defamation.
 
The Lawfare Podcast
"Taylor Lorenz on Taking Internet Culture Seriously
This week on Arbiters of Truth, our series on the online information ecosystem, Evelyn Douek and Quinta Jurecic spoke with a reporter who has carved out a unique beat writing about not just technology but the creativity and peculiarities of the people who use it—Taylor Lorenz, a columnist at the Washington Post covering technology and online culture. Her recent writing includes reporting on “algospeak”—that is, how algorithmic amplification changes how people talk online—and coverage of the viral Twitter account Libs of TikTok, which promotes social media posts of LGBTQ people for right-wing mockery. They talked about the quirks of a culture shaped in conversation with algorithms, the porous border between internet culture and political life in the United States, and what it means to take the influence of social media seriously, for good and for ill."

 
The AC thing is funny because anyone that knows anything about computer or electronics knows offices are kept cold to extend the life cycle of servers and computers since a majority of power goes to keeping those systems from overheating.


Gutfeld was funnier when he was on 3am ET and had Bill Schultz to bully. Fox making him a mainstay ruined him.

The public figures bit is scary because they tried the same thing with Sandman, claiming he became an involuntary public figure when they all decided to write a story and lie about him so they can say even if they did lie about him he can't sue them because he's a public figure. They could claim anybody with a social media profile is a profile figure and thus be impossible to sue for defamation.

It's not that scary when you consider that your synopsis is correct -- except Sandman won every civil case he filed to the tune of 10s-100s of millions in damages which also reinforced the precedential line of what a public figure is and is not. I call back to my original point that no sane person would consider a tiktok video repost account administrator to be a public figure. Lorenz deserves personal liability for what she has done, and the WaPo deserves to be crucified along with her.

All the counter doxxing is just fair game at this point, Lorenz made the bed, she can sleep in it now.
 

Attachments

  • FQt3xc4WUAswtX9.jpg
    FQt3xc4WUAswtX9.jpg
    81.5 KB · Views: 182
Another interesting tidbit about her stay in C'ville in 2017, she made a series of in-the-moment tweets that went against the narrative around James Fields car crash/attack. All of them deleted obviously.
Yes, this was touched on in BostWiki's video. Literally the only two possibilities to explain these tweets are a) she lied about what was happening on the ground to defend James Fields for some reason, or b) she reported what she saw, but later deleted the tweets to go along with the popular narrative, thereby lying by omission.

Taylor, why does lying come so naturally to your forked tongue?
 
Gutfeld was funnier when he was on 3am ET and had Bill Schultz to bully. Fox making him a mainstay ruined him.
It started back then, after Red Eye got popular Fox News started taking it seriously and severely cut down on what they were allowed to say and who was allowed to appear on the show. That's why one of the bits was Greg getting upset and disappointingly writing down things they would have to censor which included mentioning the names of old now prohibited guests.

Greg does seem to have gotten more stuck up (and conservative) since parting with Bill and Andy (Alison Rosen also wrote a lot of Greg's perverted jokes) and becoming popular on The Five too. I always got the impression Greg wanted to be taken seriously as a conservative commentator and has shed much of his sense of humor to fit what he imagines that kind of person is. (I think this has also made his politics dumber.) Although I probably doubt he would care about such "you sold out" type comments especially since becoming the most popular late night host on television. (The comparison to Stephen Colbert above is fun because I think similar things of him since dropping the Colbert character for becoming an insufferable parody on his CBS show. John Oliver also lost his teeth over the Trump years. Whether either is an honest change or seeing what Jon Stewart/Bill Maher/Dave Chappelle/etc. gets for ever stepping ever so slightly out of line I can't know.)
 
Ryan Long on the other hand is ACTUALLY funny and would be better for it.
Ryan Long carries for the gunt and dislikes the Kiwi Farms. Ryan has appeared on the Killstream and made paywalled episodes with Ethan Ralph for the now defunct killstream.tv

No one noticed Ryan coming on the Killstream for either being unfunny or Ralph being a walking circus, probably the later.
 
Last edited:
Yes, this was touched on in BostWiki's video. Literally the only two possibilities to explain these tweets are a) she lied about what was happening on the ground to defend James Fields for some reason, or b) she reported what she saw, but later deleted the tweets to go along with the popular narrative, thereby lying by omission.

Taylor, why does lying come so naturally to your forked tongue?
Truly a war between her obedience to the narrative vs. her need to be the main victim.

It started back then, after Red Eye got popular Fox News started taking it seriously and severely cut down on what they were allowed to say and who was allowed to appear on the show. That's why one of the bits was Greg getting upset and disappointingly writing down things they would have to censor which included mentioning the names of old now prohibited guests.

Greg does seem to have gotten more stuck up (and conservative) since parting with Bill and Andy (Alison Rosen also wrote a lot of Greg's perverted jokes) and becoming popular on The Five too. I always got the impression Greg wanted to be taken seriously as a conservative commentator and has shed much of his sense of humor to fit what he imagines that kind of person is. (I think this has also made his politics dumber.) Although I probably doubt he would care about such "you sold out" type comments especially since becoming the most popular late night host on television. (The comparison to Stephen Colbert above is fun because I think similar things of him since dropping the Colbert character for becoming an insufferable parody on his CBS show. John Oliver also lost his teeth over the Trump years. Whether either is an honest change or seeing what Jon Stewart/Bill Maher/Dave Chappelle/etc. gets for ever stepping ever so slightly out of line I can't know.)
I thought Red Eye was pretty funny whenever I saw clips of it. It was super loose and had a very, very late night feel.
 
I was acquainted with her brother Pete in another life, and remember him as an affable idiot; the rest of the family, most of all the mother, are even more miserable than can be portrayed on a screen.
The last I heard, he and the chronically-ill sister were "working" for daddy in Colorado.
Would be a real shame if they were inconvenienced by their daughter's complete lack of character, couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.

P.S edit: What an unfortunately motivated sale of their Connecticut estate. Timing is everything, better luck next time.
1650606599917.png
 
Last edited:
I was acquainted with her brother Pete in another life, and remember him as an affable idiot; the rest of the family, most of all the mother, are even more miserable than can be portrayed on a screen.
The last I heard, he and the chronically-ill sister were "working" for daddy in Colorado.
Would be a real shame if they were inconvenienced by their daughter's complete lack of character, couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.

P.S edit: What an unfortunately motivated sale of their Connecticut estate. Timing is everything, better luck next time.
View attachment 3204702
I take it that Paige, the lesbian, is "chronically ill" then? With the usual fibromybackaches or something else? She's the one who works in dad's industry, the other sister is in media.
 
What I find so ironic is that Lorenz used a German company to help her dox an Orthodox Jewish woman-- yet the woke brigade calls people who think like the Jewish woman "Nahtsees". You can't make this shit up.

Whenever I've been in contact with people from that community (Orthodox Jewish), they always seem to have their shit together, have family businesses, women seem happy, men seem happy, they have large families and well behaved children. They're one of the few fundamentalist type groups that, albeit controversial at times, often have supportive communities. I could say the same thing about many of the Amish and Mennonites-- and I imagine they feel same way about this gender bullshit.
 
nice, this is a real thread now! :drink:
"Orthodox rabbis demand apology from Washington Post after identifying Libs of TikTok owner as Orthodox Jew"

"Does it matter if an Orthodox Jew is doxxed in an attempt to silence her?"

"WaPo Criticized for Revealing Person Behind Libs of TikTok Account As Orthodox Jew"

"WaPo’s anti-Semitic hit piece and other commentary"

"Mistaken for a right-wing media star, she met a cyberbullying mob"

‘Sociopathic’: DeSantis Spokeswoman Torches Washington Post And Taylor Lorenz

INTERNET ARCHIVE ERASES TAYLOR LORENZ TWITTER PAGE

View attachment 3203261View attachment 3203262
View attachment 3203263View attachment 3203265
View attachment 3203267View attachment 3203268
Should we start digging into Matt Binder? He's been consistently simping for Lorenz to a nauseating point. There's no way someone like that has zero skeletons in his closet.

Also that "ListComesForAll" is channeling the same gayfuck gimmick vibes as the old "Racism Watchdog" account.
 
Washington Times article: "Taylor Lorenz's War on Normal People"

(Archive)

In mythology, harpies are a race of half-human, half-bird creatures with pale faces and long claws who descend on prey as fast as the blowing wind. In these disenchanted times, we have, instead of those shrill hybrids, the liberal journalist.

A good example is found in Washington Post columnist Taylor Lorenz. She recently used data gathered by a far-left activist named Travis Brown, whose activities are subsidized by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, to shred the privacy of an American citizen.


On April 19, Ms. Lorenz published private and identifying information — also known as “doxing” — about the owner of a Twitter account called Libs of TikTok, supposedly because they had stoked hatred against LBGTQ people. The account shares videos and social media posts uploaded to public channels that often show teachers introducing children to sexual content and concepts behind parents’ backs. Ms. Lorenz linked to the name, address and employer of the account owner and visited a house that belonged to someone in their family. Ironically, she previously complained about doxing in a TikTok video, criticizing reporters who put the full name of a private person in print.

Cameron Barr, the Post’s senior managing editor, defended the paper’s decision to run the story in a statement amid scathing criticism. “We did not publish or link to any details about her personal life,” Mr. Barr wrote. But that’s not true. The Wayback Machine shows that the Post initially linked to a website containing the owner’s name and address and then quietly removed that link before issuing a public statement, which was tweeted by Kristine Coratti Kelly, the Post’s chief communications officer. The change undermines claims by the Post that it did nothing wrong. If that were true, it wouldn’t have covertly removed the link.

Ms. Lorenz’s article draws heavily on Mr. Brown’s work. She wrote that “Brown (who is working on a project with support from Prototype Fund, an organization that backs open-source projects) unearthed the account’s Twitter history and posted a thread detailing information about its profile changes.” Over the weekend, Mr. Brown helped reveal the identity of the person behind Libs of TikTok by digging up an old handle that used their name. In a private message, the owner told me that Ms. Lorenz “started harassing people” around that time. Whether Mr. Brown actively helped Ms. Lorenz is unclear, but she wrote her article using his research.

Mr. Brown’s project, the “Hatespeech-Tracker,” tracks millions of tweets that an army of “antifascist” trolls use to harass and dox people. It’s supported by the Prototype Fund, an Open Knowledge Foundation Germany initiative, which the BMBF funds. The Open Knowledge Foundation also partners on tech initiatives with the National Endowment for Democracy, which is intimately connected to the CIA. Leftists think they’re underdogs, but they’ve got powerful institutions behind them.

Mr. Brown denies accusations of cyberstalking and doxing. Instead, his approach is to design and provide tools to others who do the dirty work, maintaining degrees of separation. He credited Twitter user “KΛЯMΛ,” an anonymous account run by a self-described “Antifascist researcher & archivist,” with helping put him “on the trail” that led to Brown discovering information about the owner of Libs of TikTok. The accounts that use Mr. Brown’s tools and with which he has interacted on Twitter to facilitate their use against mutual enemies include various far-left groups, like Salish Coast Antifa.

Twitter’s privacy clause prohibits “the use of Twitter data in any way that would be inconsistent with people’s reasonable expectations of privacy.” Having one’s name and address published in a major paper due to Mr. Brown’s use of that data should cross the line. He knows that because, according to his LinkedIn, Mr. Brown worked as a Twitter “Open Source Advocate.” The official Twitter Open Source account still features several pictures of Mr. Brown speaking at events.

Ms. Lorenz’s source harbors a deep hatred for conservatives and law enforcement specifically. “Nice to see Berlin trying out positive, actionable alternatives to ‘all cops are bastards,’” Mr. Brown commented on graffiti that read, “ALL COPS ARE TARGETS.” Last April, he wrote, “Like I have no idea who’s going around writing ‘dead Cops don’t kill’ everywhere but I feel safer and happier knowing that they’re here.” Charming stuff.

But it wasn’t anarchists or loons dreaming of dead cops who used Mr. Brown’s work this time. It was a reporter for a major U.S. newspaper. Ms. Lorenz claims that she acted to protect LBGTQ people from a lone activist who took it upon themselves to show parents what happens after they drop their kids off at school and head to work. The left’s enemies are always Goliath, and they wee but fierce David.

In reality, Ms. Lorenz deployed the firepower of Media Matters and the ACLU, whose combined assets and resources are immense, to smear someone in a paper owned by billionaire Jeff Bezos. She used the work of a far-left activist whose vendetta against civilization is subsidized by a foreign government and who the Post elevated for the same — and real — reason Ms. Lorenz wrote that story: They hate normal Americans. It’s impossible to draw any other conclusion from people so upset about parents wanting to protect their children from predation and exploitation.

Ms. Lorenz is ultimately nothing more than a regime harpy who oozes crocodile tears when challenged by her victims. Indeed, the prospect of them fighting back, as Libs of TikTok has, is terrifying. It should be, because it threatens the chokehold they’ve held over society and culture for too long.

• Pedro L. Gonzalez is the associate editor at Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture.
 
Back