Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

TWO Taylor videos in one day? We are spoiled.
Hey Taylor(we all know you read this thread, you are too vain not to), as women age, they can get excess skin on the front of their neck, it's commonly called turkey neck. Given your age and frankly just from looking at it, anyone can tell that you should see a plastic surgeon to fix yours. You using your long hair and/or turtle necks to cover it up isn't working anymore. While you are under, go ahead and have them take some hedge trimmers to your eye brows, they are far to thick for your average hair trimmer. Your welcome!
 
1663121193988.png
IT'S ONLY OK WHEN I DO IT!
The bitch is lashing out to a point Washington Post is going to get sued for something she does that's sloppier than her stinky clam.
The whole Kef-fails thing has gone to her already swollen head. Which is good, because egomaniacs like Taylor make careless mistakes when high on their own farts
 
Last edited:
I can't upload images right now, but ThatUmbrellaGuy claims Taylor was threatening him, demanding comment on a hitpiece about himself. https://archive.ph/Nuq9p

Basically, she's accusing him of being sexist for speaking ill of Amber Heard.
My brother, I got ya
1663196175992.png
Tweeted pic
1663196218181.png
"I shat myself repeatedly in front of a bunch of people while pretending to work and now everyone is pointing at me and calling me "stinky shorts shitter" and I smell!"

This woman is something other than else. I don't know who she's fucking that's letting her show her ass over and over again in such an embarrassing fashion. She keeps dragging WaPo into her shit filled tantrums and I do not understand why they let her get away with it. Other than her selling her sagging snatch to her supervisors, the only thing that I can think of is WaPo simply does not care because journalistic no longer matters in this world of click culture. Tim Pool, I'm not here to argue anything about him nor defend him from any well deserved criticism, has been saying for years how these news companies artificially inflate their numbers so their stocks go up and they can get more ad money. I could buy that they keep her just for the outrage views. I could believe that she's an almost 40 year old whore who never settled down, can't drink enough box wine to quiet the voice that whispers "you should've had a child years ago instead of being a bitch", and takes out her frustrations on the world and doing it very obviously and poorly because she's a dumdum.
 
I looked at this Radford reporter's Twitter and it's all RTs - she's hosting a news show on NBC that will be on every afternoon starting next week or so. I wouldn't be surprised if this was entirely professional jealousy because Taylor thinks she should be on TV so she lashed out.
mte. Morgan Radford is booked and busy, and Taylor is seething online wrapped in a plastic bubble
 
Did I suffer a stroke? When did less than five months become "years"?
View attachment 3684640
I'm struggling with this. Am I missing something? Is this slack cunt just bad at writing or is she really saying that we have targeted her for years even though this thread was crated on April 19th of the year of our lord, 2022, ie this very same goddamned year?
Every narcissist chronicled on this site does this. Taylor probably said something stupid on Twitter and got a post about it in some thread or an entire A&H thread about it years ago and that means she's been stalked as the number one victim of this site ever since and we coordinated the attacks on her life with libsoftiktok, Glenn Greenwald and Johnny Depp. Why else would there be consequences (aka people making fun of her) for her completely perfect actions? It must be a sinister hate conspiracy dating back years.

I'd ask why all of them think there must be some kind of long term conspiracy acting against them but the answer that they're narcissists who are operating their own conspiracies against people seem like the only potential rational explanation.
 
Every narcissist chronicled on this site does this. Taylor probably said something stupid on Twitter and got a post about it in some thread or an entire A&H thread about it years ago and that means she's been stalked as the number one victim of this site ever since and we coordinated the attacks on her life with libsoftiktok, Glenn Greenwald and Johnny Depp.
Honestly, I think the first time she got any real attention here was after her stupid interview when she cried funny and everybody made fun of her because of it. This happened just little before the LOTT article, which increased the exposure. If it wasn't for that stupid article, she wouldn't be more than a forgotten thread in A&N. And she's done shitty stuff before, but nobody really cared, tbh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murph
This woman is something other than else. I don't know who she's fucking that's letting her show her ass over and over again in such an embarrassing fashion. She keeps dragging WaPo into her shit filled tantrums and I do not understand why they let her get away with it. Other than her selling her sagging snatch to her supervisors, the only thing that I can think of is WaPo simply does not care because journalistic no longer matters in this world of click culture.
It's Jeff Bezos' paper. It might as well be called the Silicon Valley Post or better still the Amazon Post. Bezos didn't buy it because he cares about journalism, but because he wanted a big newspaper that he can control, which is what he got. He probably thinks it's great what she's doing.
 
Let's be honest here, Taylor at this point is disposable. She failed to kill Libs of TikTok and as such she is now being used against lesser targets like Kiwifarms. She's not going be irrelevant in a couple of decades, she has another 10 years top unless there's a sudden swing in faith in journalism.

She will have her uses for a while yet but any dream she had of being a talking head or similar basically is reliant on a radical shift..
 
Last edited:
Let's be honest here, Taylor at this point is disposable. She failed to kill Libs of TikTok and as such she is now being used against lesser targets like Kiwifarms. She's not going be irrelevant in a couple of decades, she has another 10 years top unless there's a sudden swing in faith in journalism.

She will have her uses for a while yet but any dream she had of being a talking head or similar basically is reliant on a radical shift..
Ten years is a little generous. After her stunt with Morgan Radford and MSNBC, I can't imagine too many journos would be willing to stick their necks out for her next time she pisses off some content creator's fans.

But you hit the nail on the head when you said she's replaceable. Being a professional victim is the easiest thing in the world and there are younger, prettier women who can elicit way more sympathy than her.
 
Taylor and the troon squad celebrate another win against famed woman name streamer Destiny
(A)
View attachment 3695713
Edit:
This looks like another organized campaign or media/keffals catalyzed through bullying ban
(A)
View attachment 3695719
Do you think Taylor imagined when she entered journalism in the 1940's as the first independent woman journalist that she would spend her time and byline on retards getting banned off Twitter by other retards?
 
It's Jeff Bezos' paper. It might as well be called the Silicon Valley Post or better still the Amazon Post. Bezos didn't buy it because he cares about journalism, but because he wanted a big newspaper that he can control, which is what he got. He probably thinks it's great what she's doing.
Maybe she gives him head? Sex for career advancements is a common thing that everyone know is going on, but not polite to admit.
 
Maybe she gives him head? Sex for career advancements is a common thing that everyone know is going on, but not polite to admit.
If she's having sex to keep her job, I honestly doubt it's Bezos. It has to be someone from the paper, closer to her. I mean, I doubt he would even consider a woman who's older than him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snoot booper
If she's having sex to keep her job, I honestly doubt it's Bezos. It has to be someone from the paper, closer to her. I mean, I doubt he would even consider a woman who's older than him.
proably correct doesn't have to be him, just a higher up, not saying she is just wont be surprised
 
Back