Streaming on the surface is already crazy, you re-download the same thing over and over again, and you don't even get to own the licensed copy on your computer. Imagine if all of the Amazon's book are that way because people didn't buy paper books anymore. They will just change books and nobody will know what was changed. lol
This is a pressing issue, that should be addressed now (it would have been 20+ years ago) before it's too late. Call me autistic, but if everything gets locked down, that's the end of the Internet as we know it, and possibly human culture as well. As far as I can tell, the powers-that-be have none of our interests even as a consideration.
This is also why I prefer paper books, music on physical formats, and locally stored digital media for films and TV.
Streaming is the absolute wet dream of the RIAA and other pondlife. They are still butthurt that they wrote off the cassette tape as just a dictation machine with ideas above its station, and when stereo, CrO2 formulations, and manufacturers like Revox and Tandberg and Nakamichi got involved at the enthusiast end and things like the Sony Walkman at the normie end they were pissed. All of a sudden anyone with an off the shelf device could make pretty damn good copies of vinyl records and (later) CDs that were only marginally lower fidelity than the original recordings, as many times as they could buy blank tapes, and worse, share them with others. The only deficiency it had was tape to tape copies deteriorated with each generation noticeably.
This is why when the DCC, Digital Audio Tape, and Minidisc came out, they got out the lawyers and lobbyists and set to nobble it. The result was that the Minidisc, a format that had all the advantages of the cassette tape in terms of shareability and copyability and no loss of fidelity between copies, was strangled at birth in North America.
First-gen file sharing like Napster was sued out of existence. But they got smart. They bought the second generations of file sharing. Rebranded as "streaming services" they now can regulate what you listen to or watch, when you listen to or watch it, make you pay for every play, and pull things that are inconvenient or upset powerful interest groups.
What they forget, though, is another one of the reasons why the cassette tape was so popular esp. in the Soviet bloc and the Third World where media was tightly controlled by the state. It allowed for huge distribution of forbidden recordings by hand by almost anyone. I have read some people who blame the cassette tape for Ayatollah Khomeini's revolution in Iran because while he was forbidden from public speaking in the 1970s his followers would tape his sermons and speeches and distribute them with twin decks amongst each other. In the modern era it is a format that is cheap (there are still people making passable Type 1 blanks such as the Maxell UR and nostalgia-market manufacturers such as Recording The Masters who literally bought BASF's old tape factory and moved it to France, and occasionally enthusiast companies like Tapeline or Retro Style Media come across pancake of Type 2 and Type 4 and will custom load it for you) and by dint of being analog is impossible to DRM. It's also endlessly copiable and you can circumvent its natural deterioration between generations by sticking your deck's output into the mic input of a PC, recording it in with Audacity, then play the resulting audio file into the aux input of a deck set to record. And even if it becomes normal for Big Tech to audit your cloud storage or even local storage every so often for wrongthink or forbidden material on the quiet, you've got your airgapped physical media that is impossible to DRM.
I dunno, it's late and I'm feeling autismal, but in the superior future of corporate feudalism, maybe the cassette tape is the new samizdat.