Tech you miss/ new tech trends you hate - ok boomers

I miss PDAs and Electronic Organizers. You could have a handy electronic tool without it being a privacy risk with fisher price design ethos.
Not to mention all the industries are learning from Apple's lead on how to make things less owned by the owner and more be at the mercy of the manufacturer.
I hate smart phones, they are clunky, non personal and in general sucks if you want to actually input data not just consume it.
 
I'm annoyed even good trends can get fucked up and become annoying.

Standardised cables on phones and similar devices are great if anyone remembers the ass pain of owning a dozen different chargers and different cables.

I recently discovered not all micro USB cables can transfer data. I needed to transfer something to an old phone recently and none of my 10+ cables could transfer data. Some of these came with devices you would think would need that like kindles. Luckily I had a rusted out old BlackBerry cable that did the job.

Fortunately I think usb c will gradually replace all this crap.
 
I recently discovered not all micro USB cables can transfer data.
As long as you are aware the cable can't transfer data, this is not necessarily a bad thing. It's ideal for when you need to top off your device at a public charging station. You don't want to use a cable that can expose your device's data.
 
This has actually made me hate Rust even though I have no actual opinion on Rust itself other than it seems like a meme language.

It wouldn't be so insufferable if they weren't so fucking smug about their heap of dependencies and shit all over older and proven software that works fine by calling it "outdated" and "obsolete" by default although their creation isn't any better and often worse in many ways.

Dependencies in general are a big nu-tech crime and it's very visible with Rust (which is not the inherent fault of rust) I swear to god some rust garbage pulls libraries in that are literally a few lines of code where just writing that stuff would've been probably quicker for a competent programmer than googling if a library exists. It's also makes you end up with a program where you as the programmer don't really know what it does because you don't know how all that stuff you pulled in even works, this can even lead to safety hazards (as in - intentionally malicious code in these dependencies) in the worst case. It's ridiculous. The small upside is that I don't bother anymore with programs where I see that they have a ton of dependencies. It's a good indicator for garbage programming.
 
In regards to the automotive industry's growing obsessions with electronics and touchscreens, I don't like how in some cars, controls such as A/C or volume, are now on touchscreens, instead of simple to use knobs and buttons in the past. It's a headache waiting to happen when the touchscreen inevitably fails, not to mention it being a hazard due to needing to pay more attention to adjust your A/C settings with a touchscreen. And touchpad controls, i.e. on Lexus's cars, are even worse in this regard.

I'm also not a fan of screens to display the speedometer and tachometer, compared to the trusty gauges of past cars.
 
Last edited:
I'm also not a fan of screens to display the speedometer and tachometer, compared to the trusty gauges of past cars.
The cheaper models of Tesla actually put the speedometer on the central display rather than behind the steering wheel (which has nothing at all). It seems like an accident waiting to happen.
I asked the salesman if the only gauge really was in the middle of the car, and he said "Yes... but it's very artfully placed!" Gotta give him points for trying :lol:
 
I'm annoyed even good trends can get fucked up and become annoying.

Standardised cables on phones and similar devices are great if anyone remembers the ass pain of owning a dozen different chargers and different cables.

I recently discovered not all micro USB cables can transfer data. I needed to transfer something to an old phone recently and none of my 10+ cables could transfer data. Some of these came with devices you would think would need that like kindles. Luckily I had a rusted out old BlackBerry cable that did the job.

Fortunately I think usb c will gradually replace all this crap.
A lot of cheaper cables will likely still omit data simply because that makes the product have higher margins on sale. The problem will likely never end, but as others have said, you can find which cables have data because they are labeled as so.
 
Sony still makes some pretty decent plain jane wired headphones. I've found their ZX110 headphones pretty good. They've got a nice heft to them and seem industructable. They're only like $20 too. I only use them to listen to the radio and podcasts though. Maybe if you're an audiophile you'll find them shitty.
they're not whoopity shit Studio Monitor grades, but they're pretty good
when I've worked in radio they're one of the most common headphones I've seen people buy for themselves, they're a good balance of quality and cheap enough that it's not a big deal when you break them
 
  • Like
Reactions: Never Scored
The fuck is all of this faux-leather bs? Shit lasts about a month before it starts flaking off and getting everywhere. Rather get real leather or some kinda kevlar mesh. I'll buy the stuff to keep it clean and conditioned if it means I don't have to keep buying replacements all the damn time.
I had need to use my USB headset for a webinar this week and I discovered that the faux leather on mine was flaking off and getting all over my laptop, meeting materials, and hair. Worse, the padding can't be removed/replaced like the pads on my radio headphones can.

What I'm saying is we need to bring back headphones that aren't just some disposable pos. Have half a mind to try and just build a damn pair.

Agreed. The larger trend that it's easier to make everything disposable at the first issue than it is to make things reliable is frustrating. *sigh*
 
The cheaper models of Tesla actually put the speedometer on the central display rather than behind the steering wheel (which has nothing at all). It seems like an accident waiting to happen.
I asked the salesman if the only gauge really was in the middle of the car, and he said "Yes... but it's very artfully placed!" Gotta give him points for trying :lol:

That also reminded me about how some of the newer Honda models didn't even have a volume knob, i.e. the 2016-2018 Civic. Fortunately, they did re-add the volume knob in the later models, i.e. the 2019 Civic model on, but I still don't know why Honda would try to cost-cut in that manner.
 
Time for another soapbox session, I think. I'll tell you what I really fucking hate is the devolution of web browsers, and how we're just happily letting Google (of all fucking companies) dictate the standards.

I used Firefox for years and got very comfy with the sheet amount of customizability of it, then tried Chrome for a few days when it came outand kept running into "You can't move this element" or "Chrome extensions don't have the ability to do this thing" and so on. In Firefox, I could block ads from ever loading. In Chrome, they'd still be loaded, just not rendered. That's a pretty big fucking hole if you ask me.

In Firefox, I (at one point, long ago) had one bar across my window, with the rest being clean open rendering space. It had my URL bar next to my tabs and a bookmark menu button next to that. That was it. No other buttons needed, thanks to mouse gestures, hotkeys, and keyword based search. It was glorious.

After that, I've avoided Chrome/Chromium and their derivatives whenever possible for years out of a combination of distrust for any code base built by Google and the fact that, frankly, I hate how stripped down and spartan Chrome is.

It used to be the case that your browser provided basic functionality and otherwise focused on flexibility, so you could do whatever the hell you wanted with it so long as either you or someone else bothered to spend the time writing the extensions necessary. It did its job and then got out of the way. In current year, you get limousine liberal politics shoved down your throat on the default start page, the default UI has its own fucking sense of self preservation, and updates pushed that actively remove features. Good luck building a browser setup like the old Firefox one I mentioned up above, even in Firefox, nowadays, because the QuAnTuM update destroyed that flexibility and everything is fucking Chromium based.

On that now, why in the fuck is everyone in the FOSS scene using Chromium as a basis for anything related to web browsing? How fucking quickly we forget the late 90s Misrosoft tactic of "Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish." Google has effectively poisoned the well by releasing a version of their browser as open source, the prevalence of which in virtually any would-be open source alternative or fork has ensured that they get to dictate the standards for what the web looks like from here on out.

God damn, open source devs have become a lazy bunch of pricks, and open source consumers have become a bunch of spoiled assholes. Nobody tries to build from scratch any more, and if they do the only attention their project gets is to get beaten over the head with comparisons against bullshit like all of these Chromium forks instead of valuable contributions, criticisms, and/or bug reports, so they end up abandoning their projects. Software as a whole as become such a toxic shithole.

Disclaimer: For reasons I can't really get into, I do use a modern version of Chrome on a regular basis for work, so this isn't me talking out of my ass based on a few days of hands on experience over a decade ago. It's still the same rigid piece of shit it's always been, just with more idiots duped into maintaining a constant semi for it.
 
God damn, open source devs have become a lazy bunch of pricks, and open source consumers have become a bunch of spoiled assholes. Nobody tries to build from scratch any more, and if they do the only attention their project gets is to get beaten over the head with comparisons against bullshit like all of these Chromium forks instead of valuable contributions, criticisms, and/or bug reports, so they end up abandoning their projects. Software as a whole as become such a toxic shithole.
Making a modern web browser from scratch would be a huge undertaking. Even Google didn't dare to do that and just forked WebKit.
They don't just display text and images anymore, they are an whole application framework for doing anything you'd possibly want with a computer.

A modern browser like Chrome or Firefox currently implements APIs for things like hardware accelerated graphics, AR and VR, video decoding, audio de/encoding and recording with a pipeline system capable of running filters and FFT analyses, streaming and screen capture, DRM schemes, a relational database, BlueTooth, vector graphics and fonts, joysticks, payment system, a million different communication protocols, and more.

No one is going to make a browser from scratch that does all this shit. And retarded web devs immediately jump to all the latest features, even if they don't need them at all, so a sane browser like NetSurf won't work with a majority of web sites.

The modern web is the absolute worst thing to ever happen to computing.
 
On that now, why in the fuck is everyone in the FOSS scene using Chromium as a basis for anything related to web browsing? How fucking quickly we forget the late 90s Misrosoft tactic of "Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish." Google has effectively poisoned the well by releasing a version of their browser as open source, the prevalence of which in virtually any would-be open source alternative or fork has ensured that they get to dictate the standards for what the web looks like from here on out.

God damn, open source devs have become a lazy bunch of pricks, and open source consumers have become a bunch of spoiled assholes. Nobody tries to build from scratch any more, and if they do the only attention their project gets is to get beaten over the head with comparisons against bullshit like all of these Chromium forks instead of valuable contributions, criticisms, and/or bug reports, so they end up abandoning their projects. Software as a whole as become such a toxic shithole.
People forget what a shit hole the web was when IE6 had a majority of the web share and was stagnate for the better part of a decade.
As much as Mozilla is fucking over Firefox, I keep with Firefox just out of Spite of Apple (who forked Webkit from KHTML) and Google.
 
A modern browser like Chrome or Firefox currently implements APIs for things like hardware accelerated graphics, AR and VR, video decoding, audio de/encoding and recording with a pipeline system capable of running filters and FFT analyses, streaming and screen capture, DRM schemes, a relational database, BlueTooth, vector graphics and fonts, joysticks, payment system, a million different communication protocols, and more.
Exactly. Just to implement the current HTML spec means effectively writing a preemptive multitasking operating system in your browser.

Compare HTML 5.2:
https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/

Versus HTML 4.01 plus DOM:
https://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
https://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/

Back in 2000, people were still talking about rendering documents. How quaint!
 
Making a modern web browser from scratch would be a huge undertaking. Even Google didn't dare to do that and just forked WebKit.
They don't just display text and images anymore, they are an whole application framework for doing anything you'd possibly want with a computer.

A modern browser like Chrome or Firefox currently implements APIs for things like hardware accelerated graphics, AR and VR, video decoding, audio de/encoding and recording with a pipeline system capable of running filters and FFT analyses, streaming and screen capture, DRM schemes, a relational database, BlueTooth, vector graphics and fonts, joysticks, payment system, a million different communication protocols, and more.

No one is going to make a browser from scratch that does all this shit. And retarded web devs immediately jump to all the latest features, even if they don't need them at all, so a sane browser like NetSurf won't work with a majority of web sites.

The modern web is the absolute worst thing to ever happen to computing.

You know, I will fully acknowledge that you are absolutely right. How the hell did we get here? What has the web "evolving" into this bloated, over engineered mess done to benefit any of us? In what way is doing anything online better than it was circa 2007-2012? I just don't understand how we so readily not only accept this reality, but actively encourage it.
 
Making a modern web browser from scratch would be a huge undertaking. Even Google didn't dare to do that and just forked WebKit.
They don't just display text and images anymore, they are an whole application framework for doing anything you'd possibly want with a computer.
What it should do is browse the web, instead of doing literally everything it does incredibly poorly.
 
The only realistic way at this point for something new coming from grassroots is to just forget the old protocols and standards and build something entirely new and simple, possibly by reusing things of the past, like Gopher. This also would keep tech-megacorp fuckery with it to a minimum since they're slow to adapt to such stuff and it'd also filter out normies as an added bonus. IMO there's no fixing the web, leaving it behind is the only realistic option.
 
The only realistic way at this point for something new coming from grassroots is to just forget the old protocols and standards and build something entirely new and simple, possibly by reusing things of the past, like Gopher. This also would keep tech-megacorp fuckery with it to a minimum since they're slow to adapt to such stuff and it'd also filter out normies as an added bonus. IMO there's no fixing the web, leaving it behind is the only realistic option.

We shall all band together and create Kiwiscape Fagigator.
 
The only realistic way at this point for something new coming from grassroots is to just forget the old protocols and standards and build something entirely new and simple, possibly by reusing things of the past, like Gopher.
It seems to me that you'd have to thread an exceedingly fine needle to allow any sort of interactivity without reopening the way to abuse. Like, how do you stop someone who wants to reinvent CGI in the new world?

It might be easier to just start a sort of artistic movement away from applications and back toward document-based design.
 
Back