The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

WHY WON'T WOMEN HAVE SEX WITH ME? JUST BECAUSE I ROUTINELY CALL THEM SLUTS AND WHORES AND DENY THEM THE RIGHT TO BODILY AUTONOMY DOESN'T MEAN THAT I AM NOT ENTITLED TO SEX.

i know this is the abortion debate containment thread, but i swear to christ this is basically how every single one of these anti-choice permavirgin turbospeds are.
You’ve thought more about their argument than they have. Those “people” don’t think. They’re against it because they’ve been told to be against it. The wokies are for abortion, so they have to be against it etc. Literal NPC behaviour.
They think they can know it all and that everything can be explained rationally. But the only thing that can be explained that way is their virginity: Unadulterated autism.
i just love how you know it's mostly men arguing against abortion, at least here on the farms. men, who will never have to carry the baby, who will never suffer from all of the shit that happens post-pregnancy, think they get to deny women their bodily autonomy. until you can get pregnant, men, you really have no place denying women of something that you yourself will never have to experience.

i mean, shit, at least anti-choice women have a leg to stand on. i certainly don't agree with them, but at least they have a fucking idea of what pregnancy and childbirth is.

edit: also only a fucking male would go "JUST USE BIRTH CONTROL" with no regard for the side effects. i know that kinda recently there was a potential male birth control pill, but men didn't like it because "it had side effects". strange that the stronger, more powerful sex can't handle some teeny tiny side effects, yet women, the weaker, fairer sex, are expected to.
Also this. Anyone making such claims about the other gender needs to neck himself (it’s almost always a “man”).
Use a fucking condom. It might even spare you an STD or two.
 
then get out of the thread lol, your repulsive a&h ilk have taken over a lot of the website anyway.
That some kind of veiled threat to cancel my ass?
Typical, typical leftoids. You niggas love to cancel as much as you love killing kids.
Ain't gonna work. I have inside info that Null himself likes my jokes.

every time you masturbate, you're killing babies

or do you recycle?
:fapcup:
George Carlin made that joke a 100 years ago, bronto.
Alls I can say you should care more about dead babies for real that me masturbating.
Though in the traditional leftoid sense dead babies probably turns you fuckers on or some shit.

PAPA NOOL SAYS IM PRETTY

lol you're so fucking pathetic that you need your shitty views to be validated by someone else.

edit: also you sound retarded when you use "leftoids".
I was never thanked by a non aborted baby yet, but with things going as they are with you leftoids going crazier and crazier, I just might get a thanks one day lol

you're not important enough to cancel, get over yourself.
Bub babies are important enough that hey should die for your pleasure lol
 
That some kind of veiled threat to cancel my ass?
Typical, typical leftoids. You niggas love to cancel as much as you love killing kids.
Ain't gonna work. I have inside info that Null himself likes my jokes.
PAPA NOOL SAYS IM PRETTY

lol you're so fucking pathetic that you need your shitty views to be validated by someone else.

edit: also you sound retarded when you use "leftoids".
 
THIS

INCELS BE LIKE : ABORTION IS LITERAL BABY MURDER

But when they jerk off to hentai aren’t they murdering sperm too

After all a embryo is just as sentient as an egg or sperm and it’s a developing human too
having consistent views and not being a hypocrite? no, that's simply too much for a literal mushbrain like mister @CAPTAIN MATI
 
  • Agree
Reactions: snailslime
i just love how you know it's mostly men arguing against abortion, at least here on the farms. men, who will never have to carry the baby, who will never suffer from all of the shit that happens post-pregnancy, think they get to deny women their bodily autonomy. until you can get pregnant, men, you really have no place denying women of something that you yourself will never have to experience.

We still get stuck footing the bill though. So we still have a perfectly vested interest in the issue. The difference of course being that if a man's primary concern was not having to provide for a child financially, he'd be very much pro-abortion, just like you are.

It's weaponised impotence. They seldom if ever focus on a woman's experiential properties. They just rant on and on and on about how they feel and how women ought to behave. Look at how desperate they are to control the narrative by responding to every point, no matter how trivial. Pure, unbridled powerlessness and failure at manhood.

The irony being that abortion advocates like yourself typically disregard male agency and believe men should have no say in anything pregnancy or child-related.

You literally argued the pro abortion stance, that's what I was referring to. I feel no need to sperg with you further if you're that disorganized.

How?

I believe that baby-killing is justified if the baby is non-sentient and the end of it's existence is beneficial to society. A pre-viability fetus has the same level of sentience as an unfertilized egg or a sperm cell.

Define "sentience."

The reason why you don’t see people throwing babies in rivers cause they are too poor to feed them in the first world is because of welfare (economic disparity is smaller here). abortion and birth control AKA no one is popping out 10 kids here

Do you think it's okay to throw a baby in a river if welfare doesn't exist?
What does it matter? You retards don't give a shit about the kid once it's born. It can starve for all you care. You just want to punish the harlots who have sex because you're a good little Republican puritan.

Since you dodged this question 3 times now, I think it's clear that yes, you do think not being in favor of infinite gibs proportional to amount of children = "not giving a fuck about the fetus after it's born."

Except you are forcing them to. People are gonna fuck. I know that makes you incels upset, but people are gonna fuck. Abstinent sexual education leads to more teen pregnancies than teaching about proper use of birth control and access to it, both of which you evangelicals are against.

So if a woman has an infant because "people are gonna fuck"--you know, she just randomly lost control of her body and it fucked Tyrone for no reason one day--would it be okay to give her the "choice" to kill the infant so that she isn't "forced" to have it?

A fetus isn't a child, but it doesn't matter.

Why isn't it?

THEY'RE THE SAME GENERAL SHAPE AND THEREFORE EXACTLY THE SAME

LOOK AT HOW SENTIENT THAT FETUS LOOKS. LOOK AT IT! LOOK AT THOSE INCREDIBLY EXPRESSIVE SENTIENT EYES AND TELL ME THAT FETUS ISN'T INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM A LIVING, BREATHING, BABY.

If your only response is substance-free mockery, I think that proves my point.
 
Breh, my position is that abortion is literally ending an innocent human life and that shit is fucked up.
You niggas are literally just thinking about me masturbating lol
your views are inconsistent, sorry. you're a babykiller because of your uncontrollable need to coom. you're a fucking monster, how dare you.
 
We still get stuck footing the bill though. So we still have a perfectly vested interest in the issue. The difference of course being that if a man's primary concern was not having to provide for a child financially, he'd be very much pro-abortion, just like you are.



The irony being that abortion advocates like yourself typically disregard male agency and believe men should have no say in anything pregnancy or child-related.



How?



Define "sentience."



Do you think it's okay to throw a baby in a river if welfare doesn't exist?


Since you dodged this question 3 times now, I think it's clear that yes, you do think not being in favor of infinite gibs proportional to amount of children = "not giving a fuck about the fetus after it's born."



So if a woman has an infant because "people are gonna fuck"--you know, she just randomly lost control of her body and it fucked Tyrone for no reason one day--would it be okay to give her the "choice" to kill the infant so that she isn't "forced" to have it?



Why isn't it?



If your only response is substance-free mockery, I think that proves my point.
you're an idiot, all your arguments have been addressed already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soggy london
your views are inconsistent, sorry. you're a babykiller because of your uncontrollable need to coom. you're a fucking monster, how dare you.
Breh, I literally just keep repeating that you should not kill babies for your hedonistic benefit.
You niggas be spamming shit about my coom lol
How gay is that shit?
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: snailslime
you're an idiot, all your arguments have been addressed already.

This entire thread is a circular loop of arguments that were already addressed. That's because the entire issue is just a circular loop of abortion advocates dodging the question on exactly how and why a fetus isn't a person but an infant is.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: The Cunting Death
Back