- Joined
- Nov 27, 2019
elaborate on what? did your sped class not teach you the basic alphabet in preschool?Conceding already? That's a record.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
elaborate on what? did your sped class not teach you the basic alphabet in preschool?Conceding already? That's a record.
There is actually a very thorough process that doctors go through to determine brain death. There is functionally zero chance that the person will ever wake up:I think I've answered this one previously in the thread. I don't have a solid answer to this one way or the other. I could see either side of that question, personally. The more relevant way to think about this situation is to imagine a coma patient who you know for a fact will wake up in a few months. What does a "nervous system respecter" do with this person?
Careful, if you keep up this train of thought, you might fall into the infinite moralfag blackhole, where literally no one in history has the capacity to be moral. You could easily make the same argument about all unused sperm and egg cells - neither has a currently functioning nervous system either but if they were simply allowed to meet and given the time to develop, they would also certainly develop into a functioning nervous system. But then we cross the Event Horizon and every period and nighttime ejaculation becomes murder.Is it okay to kill them because their nervous system is not yet functioning, despite the certain knowledge that if simply given time, it will?
I believe this post sums it up:While your observation that humans are self-serving is obviously true in a general sense (again, it's pretty clear why a whore believes in "the right to choose"), I am curious what the self-serving aspect is for someone like me. Or better, for women who are pro-life, since the trope of "well you just want to re-enact the handmaid's tale" is harder to apply to them.
What is being served is your religious worldview IMO - Fetuses have a soul to you, correct?Has anyone come up with an argument against abortion that is more than just muh feelings and muh Christ?
"Jacking off is genocide" — Some Protestant (probably)But then we cross the Event Horizon and every period and nighttime ejaculation becomes murder.
On the point you were trying to make, obviously. Are you retarded...?elaborate on what? did your sped class not teach you the basic alphabet in preschool?
oh, that you hate women?On the point you were trying to make, obviously. Are you retarded...?
Why I made that comment? What kind of question is that? It's obvious. Lurker was drumming up drama, and that's a very female thing to do.
Yes, but there is an extremely high chance that a fetus will. Hence the relevance of the comparison.at doctors go through to determine brain death. There is functionally zero chance that the person will ever wake up
Yes, we went over that earlier in the thread. You didn't answer the question. If you're answer is "I don't know," just say that.Careful, if you keep up this train of thought, you might fall into the infinite moralfag blackhole, where literally no one in history has the capacity to be moral. You could easily make the same argument about all unused sperm and egg cells - neither has a currently functioning nervous system either but if they were simply allowed to meet and given the time to develop, they would also certainly develop into a functioning nervous system. But then we cross the Event Horizon and every period and nighttime ejaculation becomes murder.
My viewpoint is not based on religion. Not unless you think it's impossible for an atheist to be pro life I guess. As has been said many times by now, every atheist (or at least the vast majority) still consider it wrong to kill children.What is being served is your religious worldview IMO - Fetuses have a soul to you, correct?
You know I've never understood why people view atheists as overwhelmingly pro choice. I mean unfortunately it's a majority but it's not absolute. Even as a Catholic, my opposition to abortion isn't just because the Church says that it's wrong. Science tells me that this is a human life, and my religion is what tells me that this is worth protecting. So long as you have those two components, you can easily arrive at the conclusion that abortion is wrong.My viewpoint is not based on religion. Not unless you think it's impossible for an atheist to be pro life I guess. As has been said many times by now, every atheist (or at least the vast majority) still consider it wrong to kill children.
lol who says?Why I made that comment? What kind of question is that? It's obvious. Lurker was drumming up drama, and that's a very female thing to do.
I kinda get where your coming from. It is indeed true that not every pregnancy is wanted or occurs in the best circumstances. However, this is a human being that we are talking about at the end of the day. I cannot think of any justification for an abortion other than perhaps to save the life of the mother. Ultimately I think that we as a society need to do a lot more to help vulnerable women who get pregnant in these circumstances.I'm against late-term abortions, the fetus ain't a fetus no more at that point. When it's still undeveloped and a fetus though, I think in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother's life, an abortion should be an option for the mother. Jut having abortions willy-nilly is irresponsible and wasteful.
I'm always up for being educated more on this though.
"Who says"? These observations are not uncommon. Or do you think men aren't more violent and/or aggressive on average than women...?lol who says?
your bias is very obvious, are you not noticing because you're autistic?
I also already went over this in an earlier post too. The nervous system respecter only respects a fully functioning nervous system. Anything that's disposed of earlier, whether sperm, egg, or fetus constitutes contraception. It's really quite simple.Yes, we went over that earlier in the thread. You didn't answer the question. If you're answer is "I don't know," just say that.
if men could get pregnant i wouldn't agree with passing laws harming their bodily autonomy. you hate women and you want us to have no rights."Who says"? These observations are not uncommon. Or do you think men aren't more violent and/or aggressive on average than women...?
I can see where you're coming from too! I think if vulnerable women had more resources to help them, we'd need less abortions to begin with. I hate seeing a life lost, but the world we're in right now kinda sucks. Here's me being optimistic, but as long as we keep fighting for what's right, things will someday get better!I kinda get where your coming from. It is indeed true that not every pregnancy is wanted or occurs in the best circumstances. However, this is a human being that we are talking about at the end of the day. I cannot think of any justification for an abortion other than perhaps to save the life of the mother. Ultimately I think that we as a society need to do a lot more to help vulnerable women who get pregnant in these circumstances.
Joke's on you, I don't even think condoms should be legal. Checkmate liberal!if men could get pregnant i wouldn't agree with passing laws harming their bodily autonomy. you hate women and you want us to have no rights.
I ultimately believe that the solution to this problem is eliminating the need for abortion and then banning it. If basically no one is getting an abortion it becomes a moot point.I can see where you're coming from too! I think if vulnerable women had more resources to help them, we'd need less abortions to begin with. I hate seeing a life lost, but the world we're in right now kinda sucks. Here's me being optimistic, but as long as we keep fighting for what's right, things will someday get better!
That wasn't the question. The question was that of a coma patient who you know will become conscious in a few months.I also already went over this in an earlier post too. The nervous system respecter only respects a fully functioning nervous system. Anything that's disposed of earlier, whether sperm, egg, or fetus constitutes contraception. It's really quite simple.
Killing offspring =/= exercising bodily autonomyif men could get pregnant i wouldn't agree with passing laws harming their bodily autonomy.
Proof? I don't hate men or women. I hate fags, I hate niggers, I hate baby killers of either gender. But do I hate women generally? No, I have no reason to. There's elements of female behavior I dislike, but same for men.You hate women
False. I think women deserve almost every right men do, but with some restrictions, such as becoming soldiers. I think men and women have roles in society, that's not hatred, just adherence to traditional values.and you want us to have no rights.
No need to derail the thread any further.how was @Lurker stirring drama?
good thing no living person is being killedKilling offspring =/= exercising bodily autonomy
classyProof? I don't hate men or women. If hate fags, I hate niggers, I hate baby killers of either gender.
uh huhBut do I hate women generally? No, I have no reason to. There's elements of female behavior I dislike, but same for men.
cringeFalse. I think women deserve almost every right men do, but with some restrictions, such as becoming soldiers. I think men and women have roles in society, that's not hatred, just adherence to traditional values.
you are the one who accused her of stirring drama.No need to derail the thread any further.