The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

Lol this thread is like moths to a flame for ErisChan

If you evangelical incels cared as much about living babies as you do fetuses, this world would be in a better spot. Instead you want to force women to give birth because you want to bring us back to the 1700s like most fundies
If you care about children so much, do you support the death penalty for child molesters?
 
If you care about children so much, do you support the death penalty for child molesters?
I am against death penalty in all cases because there's been many cases of people being falsely convicted.

I am all for life in prison for them though

It's adorable how you are a typical Fox News watching boomer though, QAnon believing and all
 
I am against death penalty in all cases because there's been many cases of people being falsely convicted.

I am all for life in prison for them though

It's adorable how you are a typical Fox News watching boomer though, QAnon believing and all
So you're okay with killing innocent fetuses, but not okay with killing guilty adults who harm children? Can't help but wonder why.
 
So you're okay with killing innocent fetuses, but not okay with killing guilty adults who harm children? Can't help but wonder why.
I am not "for" killing fetuses, but I believe a woman has a right to control her own body. You believe only in bodily autonomy when it comes to vaccines (because you claim watching Tucker Carlson makes you a medical expert) but you also believe a woman should be forced to have babies and support said babies

Typical evangelical Republican, lol. You couldn't be more of a boomer if you tried
 
I am not "for" killing fetuses, but I believe a woman has a right to control her own body. You believe only in bodily autonomy when it comes to vaccines (because you claim watching Tucker Carlson makes you a medical expert) but you also believe a woman should be forced to have babies and support said babies

Typical evangelical Republican, lol. You couldn't be more of a boomer if you tried

Do you think parents have a duty to care for their children?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
I am not "for" killing fetuses, but I believe a woman has a right to control her own body. You believe only in bodily autonomy when it comes to vaccines (because you claim watching Tucker Carlson makes you a medical expert) but you also believe a woman should be forced to have babies and support said babies

Typical evangelical Republican, lol. You couldn't be more of a boomer if you tried
I'm just trying to understand your reasoning for wanting to keep child molesters alive in prison. Prison is supposed to be a place of rehabilitation, not a punishment by itself. If someone is so defective they cannot possibly be rehabilitated, what is the purpose of keeping them alive in prison? That just imposes additional costs on the taxpayer and presents a risk that the offender will escape. How does that benefit society?
 
Do you think parents have a duty to care for their children?
Yes, but the same people who want to force women to give birth also don't believe in healthcare or welfare for poor mothers or pregnant women.

I'm just trying to understand your reasoning for wanting to keep child molesters alive in prison. Prison is supposed to be a place of rehabilitation, not a punishment by itself. If someone is so defective they cannot possibly be rehabilitated, what is the purpose of keeping them alive in prison? That just imposes additional costs on the taxpayer and presents a risk that the offender will escape.
What happens if the child molester is executed, but then evidence comes forward exonerating them? It's happened many times in our history.
 
I'm just trying to understand your reasoning for wanting to keep child molesters alive in prison. Prison is supposed to be a place of rehabilitation, not a punishment by itself. If someone is so defective they cannot possibly be rehabilitated, what is the purpose of keeping them alive in prison? That just imposes additional costs on the taxpayer and presents a risk that the offender will escape. How does that benefit society?
-screaming howling laughter heard in distance-
 
Yes, but the same people who want to force women to give birth also don't believe in healthcare or welfare for poor mothers or pregnant women.

So parents have a duty to care for their children, but also everyone else has a responsibility to take care of them too. Okay. Let's say that you have a child and, for whatever reason, you feel that you aren't receiving enough welfare to take care of them (let's just ignore the implicit assumption that you deserve any amount of welfare you feel entitled to). Are you justified in murdering the child to relieve yourself of the financial burden since not enough random strangers were willing to give you money?
 
So parents have a duty to care for their children, but also everyone else has a responsibility to take care of them too. Okay. Let's say that you have a child and, for whatever reason, you feel that you aren't receiving enough welfare to take care of them (let's just ignore the implicit assumption that you deserve any amount of welfare you feel entitled to). Are you justified in murdering the child to relieve yourself of the financial burden since not enough random strangers were willing to give you money?
it takes a village...
 
How many times, exactly?
A lot. I don't think anyone has a count but it's happened many times in our history. But even once is too many.

Why do you care more about forcing women to give birth than you do after the child is actually born? If you evangelical boomer republicans were for welfare and free healthcare I might actually care what you say but instead you just want to keep poor mothers poor by forcing them to have a baby

So parents have a duty to care for their children, but also everyone else has a responsibility to take care of them too. Okay. Let's say that you have a child and, for whatever reason, you feel that you aren't receiving enough welfare to take care of them (let's just ignore the implicit assumption that you deserve any amount of welfare you feel entitled to). Are you justified in murdering the child to relieve yourself of the financial burden since not enough random strangers were willing to give you money?
That makes no fucking sense, dude. You are saying that women should be forced to have kids, even if they're poor. You also are against welfare and free healthcare for them. So you are intentionally trying to burden them more, making their life harder to progress in life. You religious zealots are assholes
 
A lot. I don't think anyone has a count but it's happened many times in our history. But even once is too many.

Why do you care more about forcing women to give birth than you do after the child is actually born? If you evangelical boomer republicans were for welfare and free healthcare I might actually care what you say but instead you just want to keep poor mothers poor by forcing them to have a baby
And how many times child molesters escaped from prison or managed to get a reduced sentence from a lenient (or sympathetic) judge, only to reoffend again? Sounds to me like your only concern here is accidentally being mistaken for a child molester, you don't give two shits about protecting children or women from predators.
 
And how many times child molesters escaped from prison or managed to get a reduced sentence from a lenient (or sympathetic) judge, only to reoffend again? Sounds to me like your only concern here is accidentally being mistaken for a child molester, you don't give two shits about protecting children.
And how many times has that happened in our history?

Lol it's adorable how you QTards project your pedophilia on the rest of us. At least you aren't LARPing as a Russian anymore though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwi & Cow
And how many times has that happened in our history?
It happens every single day in America thanks to Soros-backed judges.

Lol it's adorable how you QTards project your pedophilia on the rest of us. At least you aren't LARPing as a Russian anymore though
Yes, the person who immediately puts themselves in the shoes of the sex offender rather than the policeman or the concerned parent is accusing everyone else of pedophilia, how quaint.
 
This thread is all the proof one needs. Do you have any proof to the contrary? So far I see a bunch of screeching cat ladies and their dickless male feminist orbiters losing their shit about something that has never affected them and never will.
This is Kiwi Farms. Obviously users against abortion will post about the (frankly hysterical) over-reactions had by certain groups - the site is built on laughing at idiots, so a reasonable rebuttal from a respectable person would never find its way here. Claiming that this thread is representative of the general population's opinion on abortion is pretty silly.
 
This is Kiwi Farms. Obviously users against abortion will post about the (frankly hysterical) over-reactions had by certain groups - the site is built on laughing at idiots, so a reasonable rebuttal from a respectable person would never find its way here. Claiming that this thread is representative of the general population's opinion on abortion is pretty silly.
The general population's opinion on abortion is "meh," they don't know what Roe vs. Wade is, nor do they give a shit. It's just not a concern to most normal people. I'm just here to laugh at the cat ladies and their orbiters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
That makes no fucking sense, dude. You are saying that women should be forced to have kids, even if they're poor. You also are against welfare and free healthcare for them. So you are intentionally trying to burden them more, making their life harder to progress in life. You religious zealots are assholes

No, in my hypothetical, no one has been "forced" to do anything. The parent has a child and comes to the conclusion, for whatever reason (maybe they lost their job, maybe welfare laws changed, etc.) that they are no longer receiving "enough welfare" (again, however much that is) to help them raise the child. Is the parent in this example justified in killing the child to relieve him/herself of the unbearable financial burden?

it takes a village...

Care to elaborate? Last I checked, children are raised by parents in our society. Up until 2 seconds ago that meant a man and a woman, but the norm is so strong that even the sexual deviant community felt obliged to try and mimic the 2-parent norm in order to try and legitimize their lifestyles. If parents are not going to be responsible for children generally speaking, what would your proposed alternative social structure be? I also note with some irony that you have claimed to be married, although in fairness, I find it likely that you are childless and plan to remain so (hence having all these fanciful leftoid fantasies floating around in your head about children and child-rearing).
 
Back