gang weeder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2022
This anti-sex stuff is really just kind of silly. Whatever your angle is, you should refrain from saying this sort of thing. Sex is inherently recreational. Procreative sex is just recreational sex without protection, even fundamentalists understand this. They don't expect you to have sex for the explicit purpose of having a baby, you have sex because you want to and then a baby results as a passively accepted result.
No, sex is reproductive, as in that is the biological reason that it exists. If it had no reproductive function, we would not have evolved to find it so pleasurable. If you believe that "abstinence is wrong," let me ask you: If a teenager in high school asked you if they should have sex now or try to wait until they are an adult, what would you tell them?
People kill other people all the time, children too. American troops in the Middle East kill children all the time, it's just something they have to do. A clueless child with an explosive belt put on them by their parents is still 'innocent', but that doesn't take away the practical danger they present to you. Maybe you'll cry and ask God/whoever for forgiveness later, but in the moment you would be a moron not to shoot them.
Yes, we typically allow for killing when deemed necessary for self-defense. This justification clearly cannot apply in the case of a fetus. So far as I know, the Taliban has not yet figured out how to use fetuses in the wombs of American women as suicide bombers. So I ask you again: Do you believe that killing children is wrong? Not an Afghani child strapped with a suicide bomb vest, a normal American child who poses no threat to anyone?
But as I said, I think there are extreme situations where you can justify killing infants. Everyone thinks this, they just don't have the balls to say it out loud. I know you're going to sperg out about this, but it's literally in the bible.
I am not referring to "tard babies." I am asking you about normal, healthy infants. According to you, killing one such infant would be the same as killing a puppy, correct?