The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

Freya said:
Because she's a mentally ill asexual lesbian
Click to expand...
She is those things, but she could also not be those things. Listen, this is something I notice in arguments with pro-choicers that I find very peculiar. We're talking in the abstract. We're already in the realm of hypotheticals, theories, and things that aren't the way they are now. We're having a conversation in the realm of should, not is, right? So why are you willing to entertain some hypotheticals but not others? Why are some ifs okay, but some ifs not?

If we're talking about what she should do, why is that should operating in a limited context? I find it odd that you have this "given that she's not doing what she should do, what should she do?" question. I would never think to ask such a question. I can't really understand it.
 
FEETLOAF said:
She is those things, but she could also not be those things. Listen, this is something I notice in arguments with pro-choicers that I find very peculiar. We're talking in the abstract. We're already in the realm of hypotheticals, theories, and things that aren't the way they are now. We're having a conversation in the realm of should, not is, right? So why are you willing to entertain some hypotheticals but not others? Why are some ifs okay, but some ifs not?

If we're talking about what she should do, why is that should operating in a limited context? I find it odd that you have this "given that she's not doing what she should do, what should she do?" question. I would never think to ask such a question. I can't really understand it.
Click to expand...

I want to know why you would want an infant around a mentally ill person that has potentially violent tendencies

I don't think youre pro life in any meaningful sense and just some weird baby fetishist.

Not only that but you don't seem to understand the common social conventions that even the other speds in here do.

You don't even post about lolcows or drama. Your entire posting history on here is political sperging.

Where did you come from and why haven't you fucked off yet?
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: CheezzyMach, Daughter of Cernunnos, Android raptor and 1 other person
Johan Schmidt said:
Android ... why do you care?

Like for real? From what you've posted I'm forced to conclude you're an asexual lesbian in her mid thirties that's probably never even been near a penis, let alone had one inside her.

You're not getting an abortion, like ever. You of all people seem to know that not having sex is an option. It just kinda seems like you like the idea of having an abortion? Honest question, not a dig.
Click to expand...
I fear rape and live in a red state that passed an abortion ban (that thankfully has been prevented from going into effect). Shit has me spooked. Plus I have lots of straight/bi female friends.
 
  • Feels
  • Dislike
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos and FEETLOAF
Zero Day Defense said:
Then, why does a doctor ever have to get involved outside a life-or-death situation?
Click to expand...
Because unfortunately you can't get misoprostol OTC in the US. Change that and you wouldn't even need a doctor involved for most abortions. There's a reason women in south Texas just drive over the border and buy pills there.
FEETLOAF said:
Also, avoiding negative consequences is not being responsible, it's just not being irresponsible.
Being responsible has positive consequences. Being responsible would be creating a child and raising it properly.
Zero is not positive.
Click to expand...
Being responsible for me would be not having children. Unfortunately my parents weren't as responsible and I'm the result. Sammie Bushart, ForeverKailyn, lovelypeaches, EmpathicNutritionist, and the Schofield clusterfuck are also great threads to read for examples of people who chose to have kids despite being completely incapable of caring for them properly.
Expurgate Contradictions said:
Somebody just have had a fun childhood
Click to expand...
Why do you think I'm so loud and proud about how people shouldn't have kids if they can't care for them properly?
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos and FEETLOAF
The Jokester said:
Dude, MY periods were like a vampire's banquet. It came out like jam it was so thick. But now I've naturally calmed it down by losing weight. You don't need a fucking pill. It's literally shrinking a virtual part of your brain. Instead of getting pissy, maybe listen to someone who has been through it themselves. If you want lighter periods, lose weight and get your thyroid checked and eat a balanced clean diet
Click to expand...
Who said anything about needing to lose weight? Maybe you were a fatty, but not all of us with heavy flows are. It's probably genetic, seeing as how my very petite and thin mom had the same problem.

There are some really fucking sanctimonious people here. This is a fucking shitposting forum. Some of you would probably be more comfortable at some forum affiliated with Focus on the Family with your "No secks before marriage!!1!!" bullshit.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: CheezzyMach, Daughter of Cernunnos, Sriracha and 2 others
Zero Day Defense said:
Well, why do the manufacturers of that drug have to produce the drug?
Click to expand...
To treat arthritis when you have stomach ulcers, to help manage miscarriages and childbirth (can literally be a lifesaver if a woman is bleeding heavily or her body isn't expelling dead fetal tissue), and, of course, to easily provide a safe and reliable abortion. It's great stuff.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos
Android raptor said:
To treat arthritis when you have stomach ulcers, to help manage miscarriages and childbirth (can literally be a lifesaver if a woman is bleeding heavily or her body isn't expelling dead fetal tissue), and, of course, to easily provide a safe and reliable abortion. It's great stuff.
Click to expand...
He's asking you why they need to produce it, not what the purpose of the drug is.

Dunno why though. 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kulmeister and Zero Day Defense
Android raptor said:
To treat arthritis when you have stomach ulcers, to help manage miscarriages and childbirth (can literally be a lifesaver if a woman is bleeding heavily or her body isn't expelling dead fetal tissue), and, of course, to easily provide a safe and reliable abortion. It's great stuff.
Click to expand...
So what are the not great aspects of it that you aren't mentioning?
 
Muh Vagina said:
There are some really fucking sanctimonious people here. This is a fucking shitposting forum.
Click to expand...
You've brought this up before, and it was just as silly then.

You're arguing for a moral standard, yourself. Where do you come off complaining about sanctimony because others argue a moral standard that contradicts yours?

Android raptor said:
To treat arthritis when you have stomach ulcers, to help manage miscarriages and childbirth (can literally be a lifesaver if a woman is bleeding heavily or her body isn't expelling dead fetal tissue), and, of course, to easily provide a safe and reliable abortion. It's great stuff.
Click to expand...
Johan Schmidt said:
He's asking you why they need to produce it, not what the purpose of the drug is.

Dunno why though. 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
My point is that if the issue is actually "bodily autonomy", then it would be fine to go full throttle and remove every occasion for a third party to be involved in one's abortion. There'd be no need to talk about "abortion access" (by way of surgeons) or abortifacents. It would in fact be okay for states to make laws that prohibit abortion services within their borders...

...but the actual crisis would come when trying to mandate that women can't take matters into their own hands.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Kulmeister, FEETLOAF and Extricate Cavitations
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back