The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

When you start to kill kids to have more sex, it stops being just your business. You don't get to have your cake and eat it too.

Have responsible sex, don't cower under "women's bodies REEEEEE".
Nobody is doing that.
Nobody wants pictures of your "bussy", and the reason you didn't already try to pass that off as a vagina is because you already know that-- fuck off.
If you want bobs and vagene, this is not they way to go.
Do I have to have a vasectomy to be against abortions? How does that work, exactly?
Because you REEEEE about us whorish women having casual sex and abortions. We don't impregnate ourselves. Put up or shut up.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CheezzyMach
If you want bobs and vagene, this is not they way to go.
You don't have any "bobs and vagene", to begin with.

We don't impregnate ourselves.
How long, exactly, are you going to continue this farce?

More on topic: this is a poor argument.

If you want to insist that the sole issue is woman's bodily autonomy, and you want to insist that men are irrelevant to the conversation, then there's absolutely no point in talking about the vasectomy status of the man the woman chose to have sex with-- they're not the focal point of the discussion, according to you. Women aren't impregnating themselves, as you say-- that cuts both ways.

It's not even a proper retort, in and of itself-- are you trying to allege that your interlocutor is having unprotected sex with other people and is contributing to the problem they complain about in the process?
 
Nobody is doing that.
>Have less sex
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE INCEL

because you REEEEE about us whorish women having casual sex and abortions. We don't impregnate ourselves. Put up or shut up.
How about you be proactive in selecting a partner? I don't know, spend time with him, talk to him, find out who he is and what he wants, instead of pawning off your responsibility on men to a point where a man has to snip his balls off so that you can have consequence-free sex?
 
Not joking here, I'm pretty sure he's actually admitted to being a virgin.
Why do you phrase this as if I accidentally admitted something shameful (as opposed to plainly and repeatedly stating it as it was relevant to a given discussion)?

As a matter of fact, what possessed you to answer such a question while it was posed to me?
 
Last edited:
Sex is fun
Not in and of itself.

It's only as "fun" (i.e. enjoyable, fulfilling) as how much you enjoy the other person, and that enjoyment gives way to emotional attachment as a direct product of the intimacy. It's a terrible idea all around to make such attachments to people with whom you have no mutual commitment and will likely leave you as soon as they've satisfied their fantasies to surfeit, and the idea of doing any such thing literally-- not figuratively, literally-- sickens me.
 
Not in and of itself.

It's only as "fun" (i.e. enjoyable, fulfilling) as how much you enjoy the other person, and that enjoyment gives way to emotional attachment as a direct product of the intimacy. It's a terrible idea all around to make such attachments to people with whom you have no mutual commitment and will likely leave you as soon as they've satisfied their fantasies to surfeit, and the idea of doing any such thing literally-- not figuratively, literally-- sickens me.
Sounds like someone is coping
 
Sounds like someone is coping
Not at all.

There's nothing more to say about it-- I just don't want to do something that'll get me severely attached to someone that didn't already make a mutual commitment with me and would probably leave once their fantasies were fulfilled to the point of surfeit as a result. It's a conclusion I came to after assessing my own desires, values, and weaknesses.

The lowkey virgin-shaming isn't something worth getting irate over-- it's enough of a pain having to explain it.
 
I get that you've never touched a female and never seen a real vagina.
Probably true
but I assure you that I am 100% natal female.
100% false

20210610_200705.jpg
 
Not at all.

There's nothing more to say about it-- I just don't want to do something that'll get me severely attached to someone that didn't already make a mutual commitment with me and would probably leave once their fantasies were fulfilled to the point of surfeit as a result. It's a conclusion I came to after assessing my own desires, values, and weaknesses.

The lowkey virgin-shaming isn't something worth getting irate over-- it's enough of a pain having to explain it.
There's a bunch of stuff in between casual sex and marriage. You can be fuckbuddies, friends with benefits, dating, etc... all can be exclusive, too. Regular sex is healthy.
 
And all of those contexts for sex have the same issue I already stated.
Whatever helps you cope with the fact no woman would want to have sex with you.

Even if you could get laid and you don't want to, it doesn't mean you should punish people who do have sex. If you don't want an abortion, don't get one. Respect women's body autonomy
 
You can keep screaming that until you're blue in the face.
I only seek to mention it when you try to deceive others about your sex in an attempt to get a leg up on them.

You're going to have to get nudes somewhere else.
This was a bizarre cope from the first time you used it, and not just because nobody wants to see your "bussy" or whatever you call it.

Are you familiar with nudes at all? They're really weird, whether we're talking about "professional amateurs" or commonstock attention whores-- most of them are shot like entries in a medical dictionary, and none are actually titillating.

Male nudes are categorically worse, and I'm glad I've been able to largely evade them.

At some point you're going to have to confront the question of why you're the only person whose assertion of being female I unironically doubt. When that happens, don't worry-- I already answered that a few pages back.
 
Back