The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

So you don't give a shit if the baby starves after its born, you just want to punish women who have sex. Got it.
And you don't give a shit that instead of giving a baby a chance to survive and become something, you'd rather kill it.

So you agree that unborn babies should have the right to control their bodies, then?
INCEL! HAVE SEX! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher
And you don't give a shit that instead of giving a baby a chance to survive and become something, you'd rather kill it.
If the mother wants to abort it, then sure, she should be able to abort it. You, on the other hand, don't give a shit if the baby would be born to a life or suffering. You just want to punish women that have sex.

So you agree that unborn babies should have the right to control their bodies, then?
Not over the mother's body autonomy.
 
So the mother's right to not be inconvenienced for 9 months trumps the baby's right to life?
Yep, body autonomy is a right in the US.

So, to prevent the baby from suffering - which is a part and parcel of human life, you'd rather just kill that baby, right?
I wouldn't say rather, but I support a woman's right to choose and have autonomy over her own body.

Do you support children receiving transgender healthcare under their right to bodily autonomy? I'm talking about this specifically.
Honestly, I don't really give a crap if tranny kids get HRT or whatever. I also don't care if they don't get it. But sure, why not? It's their body.
 
If it could be conclusively proved to you that life begins at conception, would you still support abortion?
Yep. I believe in a woman's right to choose

If it could be conclusively proved to you that life does begins at a specific time in the pregnancy, would you still want to outlaw abortion before that time?
 
And there we have it, folks. Even if there was a cast-iron proof that certain people were members of the human race, in HHH's mind it would be perfectly fine to kill them because they might inconvenience women.
You didn't answer my question.

I believe in a right to body autonomy. Like I said, the government can't force you to give up a kidney or blood to save someone. Nor should it be able to force a woman to give birth to a baby because religioustards like you object to it. The US is not a religious nation. If you don't like abortions, that's fine, don't have one, but mind your own business

Cool, so you're a classical socially liberal hypocrite.
How so? Do you support social welfare programs? You still haven't answered that question
 
And there we have it, folks. Even if there was a cast-iron proof that certain people were members of the human race, in HHH's mind it would be perfectly fine to kill them because they might inconvenience women.
Not just inconvenience women, inconvenience both sexes to have consequence-free sex.

God forbid you to want to have pleasure and use your brain while you're at it (if you really have to be a hedonist).
 
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher
Not just inconvenience women, inconvenience both sexes to have consequence-free sex.

God forbid you to want to have pleasure and use your brain while you're at it (if you really have to be a hedonist).
Accidents happen. Do you think a woman should be forced to give birth to her rapists baby, or give birth even if it would kill her?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Pissmaster
Why do you keep implying every pro-lifer on this thread opposes any sort of a welfare state?
I don't.lnow what country you live in, but nearly all American pro-lifers oppose social programs.
An organism doesn't have to breathe to be alive and feel pain.
Embryos and fetuses don't feel pain. This is a scientific fact. And by the time they do develop the proper neurons, nobody is aborting at that stage.
So the mother's right to not be inconvenienced for 9 months trumps the baby's right to life?
Yes. It's called bodily autonomy. It's my right not to want morning sickness, hemorrhoids, incontinence, varicose veins, and tearing from my V to my A.

Looks like @FEETLOAF has been aborted!
 
Why so many pro lifers here against killing? Personally I am pro abortion but only for sub humans like blacks jews etc, and I am anti abortion for whites. Who cares about a woman's autonomy or rights when society is at stake? I think the wellbeing of the group is more important than the individual. If there were only two people left on Earth, then even rape would be preferable to extinction.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: secret watcher
That's not how it works. They don't hold elections to change dictionary definitions.
I wasn't aware that legal codes were dictionaries.

Yes. It's called bodily autonomy. It's my right not to want morning sickness, hemorrhoids, incontinence, varicose veins, and tearing from my V to my A.
You don't have a "V", you delusional moron, nor do you have a "U" or "O's".

At any rate, "A's" wouldn't possess any of those things, naturally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marshal Mannerheim
Back