Plagued The Alt-Right

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
The last trailer park I spent time living in (during a time where I would have been homeless unless friends hadn't taken me in) had a crazy BPD mother who burned down the mobile home her husband and children lived in when she was self medicating. This happened on Christmas. According to the son she was enraged that her family wasn't grateful enough about the presents she got them and so she burned down what she could in a fit of rage.

There was also an older brother with a known child porn addiction, close to the end of my stay there was a massive brawl outside their designated spot because his mother found out that he had been molesting and raping the three younger children living with them. I think only one of them shared the same father with him, the other two were kids from later relationships she had. To the credit of the live in boyfriend, he did pin the rapist brother down until the police arrived. There were also three shootings while I was there and the meth was ever present.

But I understand now that these were mad superior huwhite communities and this was just their equivalent of running through wheat fields.



I'm not progressive enough to eat shit but I'm glad that there is one princess here with the guts to do it lol



There is a racial component to violence and crime but wignats can't cope with the fact that whites are not the superior race. Jews are, and that's on top of the fact that whites are just as violent and dysfunctional as everyone else.
I dont care how progressive you are, its an open invitation to suck the shit out my ass. So give it a week and pm me.
 
They are not the subject of a thread on kiwifarms, most likely.

Tough, but fair.

1593204444213.png
 
Not gonna bother, because he's clearly an imbalanced racial masochist. If he's not just trolling, his arguments all boil down to lame whataboutism about problems white societies have post-1960 (at least whites had some high place to degenerate from, unlike the rest of humanity) and which POC groups haven't egregiously fucked up what whitey has given them yet.

He has to cherrypick because history taken as a whole makes the white man look far better than everyone else. Sure, Jews, Chinese, etc. have higher IQ on paper but wtf have they done other than parasitism and copying the west?

The Chinese had their first unified Empire which dwarfed the Republic at its peak by the time Rome was fighting the first Punic War. Their philosophical writings (specifically that of Confucius) influenced the entirety of the East in the same way that Aristotle and Plato influenced all Western thought after them. China was using paper currency backed by the silver standard 5 centuries before the idea would catch on in Europe. Chinese development of Buddhist thought was so influential that every major sect besides Therevada stems from the teachings of Bodhidharma and Huike. Any standard that defines the Chinese as parasites and mimics would also exclude the great empires of the West and Near East as well and leave the Earth barren of any civilization. Your comments are myopic in the extreme and, I suspect, driven more by an ideological need to apply a double-standard to China and Europe to maintain the myth of a strict and easy hierarchy of racial castes with Anglo-Germanic Europeans at the top.
 
The Chinese had their first unified Empire which dwarfed the Republic at its peak by the time Rome was fighting the first Punic War. Their philosophical writings (specifically that of Confucius) influenced the entirety of the East in the same way that Aristotle and Plato influenced all Western thought after them. China was using paper currency backed by the silver standard 5 centuries before the idea would catch on in Europe. Chinese development of Buddhist thought was so influential that every major sect besides Therevada stems from the teachings of Bodhidharma and Huike. Any standard that defines the Chinese as parasites and mimics would also exclude the great empires of the West and Near East as well and leave the Earth barren of any civilization. Your comments are myopic in the extreme and, I suspect, driven more by an ideological need to apply a double-standard to China and Europe to maintain the myth of a strict and easy hierarchy of racial castes with Anglo-Germanic Europeans at the top.

China had a very impressive past, but since at latest the Industrial Revolution, it's fallen behind the west by most standards of development. It was a colonial property, then second fiddle to Japan's efforts to industrialize, then a communist hellhole that's only a problem for us because we outsourced too much of our shit there. See also India, Persia, the Arab world.

Apart from them and a few other East Asian countries, and paler parts of Latin America, there's not a ton of civilizational competition for westerners. I don't want to rule over them or put them in a caste system with me at the top, just not have them in my countries.
 
Last edited:
Ok, i'm drunk, bored, and probably retarded. So let's debate a "WN". Because i have nothing better to do and i don't care about ratings given how often i post anyway.

Let's skip the whole stupid ass argument about ethics and shit (we know you don't get the concept already). Let's imagine it's White Nationalist Christmas! Niggas, chinks, and all the colors of the rainbow decide to GTFO on their own, with no fucking day of reckoning. Let's ignore all the reasons why it's not a thing that can happen. Let's also imagine, with cream on top, that the whole world around your swamp is okay with that, and everything is forgiven, no wars, no debates, every country will approve millions of immigrants because you're so god damn sexy!

Basically White Only Country Status Achieved And Approved Award! In a single day! (let's ignore all the white ppl who will fuck off from your country too, and the devastating economic impact. It's WN Christmas I told you, magic)

Now what?

Do you actually think that the whiteys who will have to fill the now unoccupied ghettos and shit jobs are going to behave like good little peons? That they won't realize that they got fucked over? That's thinking very little about your own race :(

I'm sarcastic, but kinda curious. What is your ideal society supposed to look like? Because until now when i ask that stuff, you guys tend to sound like commies with a different vocabulary.

EDIT: Sadly i'm out of beer now. And debating cows doesn't seem as attractive as it did when i had booze.
 
Last edited:
Oh my, the sheer volume of autism in this thread is overwhelming.

I'm a sand nigger, so I don't have much room to argue on racial superiority. With this in mind, I'd like to point one thing out: literally every other society that has ever existed is capable of functioning without white people. In comparison to the rest of the world, white people are indeed the minority if China and India are anything to attest to.

Furthermore, what is even the criteria for whiteness? Arabs, Persians, Balochis, Sindhis, Punjabis, Pathans, Rajasthanis, Turks, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, among countless other groups of people are typically considered "brown" people and yet it's extremely common to have people from those groups to be so pale that they can be considered white. Certainly, I've been mistaken for white many times when I was younger because I was really pale growing up.

The next logical conclusion would be to define white as "European," but then that presents itself a small problem: Europe is no different from the rest of the world in that every ethnic group is clamoring over whose is superior. Hitler apparently had a fetish for the Nordic subgroup of the Aryan race, but he also had a massive hateboner for Slavs. Portugal is a piece of shit rectangle, the Spaniards love to take credit for "discovering" America, the Germans love to LARP as if they own Europe, you get the idea. Even if we were to define "white" as "European," we'd never get anywhere because now we have a bunch of retards saying "my subgroup of white people is better than your subgroup!" I thought the point was to hate OTHER people and not your own.

On another note, the alt right seems to forget that time advances in other parts of the world. The Middle Ages certainly weren't as big of a dystopian hellhole as you might think. The empires maligned for war crimes were also those same empires that actually still kept the disciplines and the humanities alive during Europe's own lull in advancement. Granted, there's no excuse from a historical perspective to justify the near eradication of the Zoroastrians but again - these powers persisted and accomplished much of the same things that the so-called "white" empires actually take credit for.

India was only captured by the British because the Sikh Empire fell and the Mughals had decayed so much that they could only realistically lay claim over to Delhi. The Rashiduns managed to beat both the Byzantines and the Sassanids because both empires wore each other thin over the centuries of conflict. If a civilisation ever becomes weak, another that can actually survive will take its place. That's the one thing that history has taught us over and over again and this is something that has happened in literally every other part of the world that has ever existed.

I'm certainly convinced that there is some concerted effort to make white people ashamed of themselves because these types of tactics are the same used by white people on other races that they've conquered. It's plainly obvious to see that there is an anti-white narrative that's being pushed by some authority that I frankly dont' care enough to learn about.

With this in mind, I absolutely detest this Eurocentric circlejerk because from an outsider's point of view, the alt right violently masturbates to European supremacy simply because the past nations of Europe... existed and did what a nation should?
 
I would understand a Jew talking like this, but damn, you must really hate yourself to talk about your own people this way. Who hurt you? Was it your white parents who kicked you out, or the schizophrenic man who robbed you of your cardboard box?

You have never come face to face with white degeneracy. You cling to shadows of a past that you have no part of as a European Amerimutt. You would rather do anything except take responsibility for the shitty behavior of your race and community. Instead you do what insecure people always do, you deflect onto different topics because you can't cope with the reality of white people being low on the totem pole compared to other races.

Oh my, the sheer volume of autism in this thread is overwhelming.

I'm a sand nigger, so I don't have much room to argue on racial superiority. With this in mind, I'd like to point one thing out: literally every other society that has ever existed is capable of functioning without white people. In comparison to the rest of the world, white people are indeed the minority if China and India are anything to attest to.

Furthermore, what is even the criteria for whiteness? Arabs, Persians, Balochis, Sindhis, Punjabis, Pathans, Rajasthanis, Turks, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, among countless other groups of people are typically considered "brown" people and yet it's extremely common to have people from those groups to be so pale that they can be considered white. Certainly, I've been mistaken for white many times when I was younger because I was really pale growing up.

The next logical conclusion would be to define white as "European," but then that presents itself a small problem: Europe is no different from the rest of the world in that every ethnic group is clamoring over whose is superior. Hitler apparently had a fetish for the Nordic subgroup of the Aryan race, but he also had a massive hateboner for Slavs. Portugal is a piece of shit rectangle, the Spaniards love to take credit for "discovering" America, the Germans love to LARP as if they own Europe, you get the idea. Even if we were to define "white" as "European," we'd never get anywhere because now we have a bunch of retards saying "my subgroup of white people is better than your subgroup!" I thought the point was to hate OTHER people and not your own.

On another note, the alt right seems to forget that time advances in other parts of the world. The Middle Ages certainly weren't as big of a dystopian hellhole as you might think. The empires maligned for war crimes were also those same empires that actually still kept the disciplines and the humanities alive during Europe's own lull in advancement. Granted, there's no excuse from a historical perspective to justify the near eradication of the Zoroastrians but again - these powers persisted and accomplished much of the same things that the so-called "white" empires actually take credit for.

India was only captured by the British because the Sikh Empire fell and the Mughals had decayed so much that they could only realistically lay claim over to Delhi. The Rashiduns managed to beat both the Byzantines and the Sassanids because both empires wore each other thin over the centuries of conflict. If a civilisation ever becomes weak, another that can actually survive will take its place. That's the one thing that history has taught us over and over again and this is something that has happened in literally every other part of the world that has ever existed.

I'm certainly convinced that there is some concerted effort to make white people ashamed of themselves because these types of tactics are the same used by white people on other races that they've conquered. It's plainly obvious to see that there is an anti-white narrative that's being pushed by some authority that I frankly dont' care enough to learn about.

With this in mind, I absolutely detest this Eurocentric circlejerk because from an outsider's point of view, the alt right violently masturbates to European supremacy simply because the past nations of Europe... existed and did what a nation should?

It's a combination of insecurity and no education. Terrorist already showed that he is completely ignorant of the histories of other nations, in this very thread he sputtered and wailed when Senior Lexmechanic gave him some basic background of China of all things. Most if not all alt-right types are like this. They don't understand that other nations and cultures have their own histories and unifying myths.

The alt-right niggers see that there is a lot of pressure to make white people feel bad about themselves (this way they can keep grifting money off the gullible). But because they have so much insecurity eating at them, and because they're so woefully untutored and ignorant, they have to make shit up or try and puff up the accomplishments and try to pretend they did them instead, as a kind of egocentric salve on the Indian rugburn the mainstream media gave them lol.

They're children playacting at being grown up.


Ok, i'm drunk, bored, and probably retarded. So let's debate a "WN". Because i have nothing better to do and i don't care about ratings given how often i post anyway.

Let's skip the whole stupid ass argument about ethics and shit (we know you don't get the concept already). Let's imagine it's White Nationalist Christmas! Niggas, chinks, and all the colors of the rainbow decide to GTFO on their own, with no fucking day of reckoning. Let's ignore all the reasons why it's not a thing that can happen. Let's also imagine, with cream on top, that the whole world around your swamp is okay with that, and everything is forgiven, no wars, no debates, every country will approve millions of immigrants because you're so god damn sexy!

Basically White Only Country Status Achieved And Approved Award! In a single day! (let's ignore all the white ppl who will fuck off from your country too, and the devastating economic impact. It's WN Christmas I told you, magic)

Now what?

Do you actually think that the whiteys who will have to fill the now unoccupied ghettos and shit jobs are going to behave like good little peons? That they won't realize that they got fucked over? That's thinking very little about your own race :(

I'm sarcastic, but kinda curious. What is your ideal society supposed to look like? Because until now when i ask that stuff, you guys tend to sound like commies with a different vocabulary.

EDIT: Sadly i'm out of beer now. And debating cows doesn't seem as attractive as it did when i had booze.

They sound like commies because they're all mini-Pol Pots and mini-Stalins at heart. They want to be authoritarian dictators that control others. They can't cope with other people having freedom because it will mean they can't order other people around. They really do believe their own shit, they think that they're angelic enough to order society from top to bottom, much like the KGB believed that they could control Soviet society. They want all centralized authority and they think they should be the ones in rich bureaucratic positions making societal decisions.

They're champagne socialists which is fitting considering their heroes are from the National Socialist Party.
 
Last edited:
1. They'd probably become dissolutioned with their belief that their near-all-white community would be a crime-free high-trust state pretty quickly, and would find very little white solidarity in the area, despite the fact there's still Klansmen in it. It turns out that cultivating xenophobia in your community leads to a community that distrusts everyone who isn't like them, regardless of skin tone.
2. My family in SC lives near one of the hearts of the Gullah culture; near-100% black community that's low-income. I would also live there without hesitation if not for my seafood allergies making dining difficult. Don't lecture me about my reverse-white privilege like I don't know shit about "real" blacks. I've been to those areas, and have found that blacks are, shockingly, actual human beings instead of malevolent welfare-fueled golems.
3. That's a community near me. I live on the Qualla Boundary, which is overwhelmingly Indian. I also enjoy living here, because the Cherokee people are culturally very similar to Appalachians and recognize the interracial solidarity we share with being fucked by the state and federal government.


1. Plenty.
2. Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Asking a comically-loaded question like that just makes you look even more like an idiot. But to answer it anyways: there's a lot of systemic violence, yes, but asserting that shitters acting shitty somehow makes a profound value judgement on an entire race is something that morons do.

Such virtue signal cringe. We can look at prison populations. People self segregate. You know 100% that you will not be as safe in a black neighborhood as a white neighborhood. You're lying to people. White lies are still lies and you're causing harm to the white community by spreading these lies.

There is a city in my state that is very black (Detroit). Surprisingly, most black people there are not happy with the city's situation and just want to live normal lives; unfortunately moving out of a city is difficult and expensive when you grow up in a poor household. Same goes for many poor white people in Detroit as well. The gangs there are not segregated, there are people of every race in those. It's a socioeconomic problem, not a racial one.
Retarded. The reason Detroit is poor is because of blacks. Living in a "poor" area is good if by poor I mean low housing prices. No, the problem is those neighborhoods are dangerous. Poor + safe = neighborhood that whites will gentrify.

Will you admit that you're diversity apologists?
 
You have never come face to face with white degeneracy. You cling to shadows of a past that you have no part of as a European Amerimutt. You would rather do anything except take responsibility for the shitty behavior of your race and community. Instead you do what insecure people always do, you deflect onto different topics because you can't cope with the reality of white people being low on the totem pole compared to other races.

I never denied white degeneracy! I post very often about it. That said, how are other races any better? Who are our betters, and why? Jews and who else? And if they are our betters, should we accept their current anti-white rule over us?

You're playing your own game of deflection, trying to paint over the massive inadequacies of nonwhites with the flaws of Western society now. Yes, trailer parks are often sad and shitty environments, but 85% of all violent crime does not come from the demographic populating trailer parks. Blacks have far more problems than poor whites...I defy you to find a white community where 70% of babies are born out of wedlock. Does this mean whites don't have problems? No! But whites also having problems doesn't make liberal egalitarian brainwashing any less false.

"Degeneracy" implies there was some higher state we degenerated from, a civilizational history you agreed was impressive. But most nonwhites can't say that. A few great nonwhite civilizations existed, but they were surpassed by the West to the point of most of those people being Europe's colonial property by the 19th century, and needing Europe's inventions to develop any power of their own (this was my point about China...I know about paper and gunpowder and all that, your Grade 6 social studies factoids don't wow me).

If we whites do have this great heritage as the civilized nations, shouldn't we care about it and try to honor it? What is wrong in having pride in something beyond your (ultimately insignificant in the grand scheme of things) job, car, college degree, etc.?
 
Last edited:
Oh my, the sheer volume of autism in this thread is overwhelming.

I'm a sand nigger, so I don't have much room to argue on racial superiority. With this in mind, I'd like to point one thing out: literally every other society that has ever existed is capable of functioning without white people. In comparison to the rest of the world, white people are indeed the minority if China and India are anything to attest to.

Furthermore, what is even the criteria for whiteness? Arabs, Persians, Balochis, Sindhis, Punjabis, Pathans, Rajasthanis, Turks, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, among countless other groups of people are typically considered "brown" people and yet it's extremely common to have people from those groups to be so pale that they can be considered white. Certainly, I've been mistaken for white many times when I was younger because I was really pale growing up.

The next logical conclusion would be to define white as "European," but then that presents itself a small problem: Europe is no different from the rest of the world in that every ethnic group is clamoring over whose is superior. Hitler apparently had a fetish for the Nordic subgroup of the Aryan race, but he also had a massive hateboner for Slavs. Portugal is a piece of shit rectangle, the Spaniards love to take credit for "discovering" America, the Germans love to LARP as if they own Europe, you get the idea. Even if we were to define "white" as "European," we'd never get anywhere because now we have a bunch of retards saying "my subgroup of white people is better than your subgroup!" I thought the point was to hate OTHER people and not your own.

On another note, the alt right seems to forget that time advances in other parts of the world. The Middle Ages certainly weren't as big of a dystopian hellhole as you might think. The empires maligned for war crimes were also those same empires that actually still kept the disciplines and the humanities alive during Europe's own lull in advancement. Granted, there's no excuse from a historical perspective to justify the near eradication of the Zoroastrians but again - these powers persisted and accomplished much of the same things that the so-called "white" empires actually take credit for.

India was only captured by the British because the Sikh Empire fell and the Mughals had decayed so much that they could only realistically lay claim over to Delhi. The Rashiduns managed to beat both the Byzantines and the Sassanids because both empires wore each other thin over the centuries of conflict. If a civilisation ever becomes weak, another that can actually survive will take its place. That's the one thing that history has taught us over and over again and this is something that has happened in literally every other part of the world that has ever existed.

I'm certainly convinced that there is some concerted effort to make white people ashamed of themselves because these types of tactics are the same used by white people on other races that they've conquered. It's plainly obvious to see that there is an anti-white narrative that's being pushed by some authority that I frankly dont' care enough to learn about.

With this in mind, I absolutely detest this Eurocentric circlejerk because from an outsider's point of view, the alt right violently masturbates to European supremacy simply because the past nations of Europe... existed and did what a nation should?
Partially true. You will not get a modern 1st world nation with a population of low IQ Arabs or Hispanics. You will still get a "civilization' but it won't be 1st world. If we imported Asians then there is an argument to be made that at least civilization would still be 1st world but that misses the point which is that a nation should protect its people. Who cares about supporting a nation or government or investing in a community when you're being replaced in your own nation?
 
China had a very impressive past, but since at latest the Industrial Revolution, it's fallen behind the west by most standards of development. It was a colonial property, then second fiddle to Japan's efforts to industrialize, then a communist hellhole that's only a problem for us because we outsourced too much of our shit there. See also India, Persia, the Arab world.

Apart from them and a few other East Asian countries, and paler parts of Latin America, there's not a ton of civilizational competition for westerners. I don't want to rule over them or put them in a caste system with me at the top, just not have them in my countries.
That wasn't the question you asked, You asked:

He has to cherrypick because history taken as a whole makes the white man look far better than everyone else. Sure, Jews, Chinese, etc. have higher IQ on paper but wtf have they done other than parasitism and copying the west?

And, sure enough, when I point out that the Chinese were the Rome of the West (only they managed to reform a local Empire ruled by their own ethnicity after their equivalent of Germanic Rule instead of splintering for over a millennium) and made massive contributions to the arts and sciences that match the output of Europe if not eclipse it, you dismiss all of that by saying "none of that matters now."
China NOW has a powerful, arguably entho-centric authoritarian state that maintains "peace and prosperity" about as well as the West's most successful example of the same. Honestly, WNs should see in China a successful model to emulate for their own ethnostate; but they refuse, because of how hard their concepts of the White Race are married to Liberalism and Enlightenment ideals.

Such virtue signal cringe. We can look at prison populations. People self segregate. You know 100% that you will not be as safe in a black neighborhood as a white neighborhood. You're lying to people. White lies are still lies and you're causing harm to the white community by spreading these lies.
"You're lying because your life experiences don't fit into my Manichean concept of race relations!"
Fuck off, Flip. Mayroon bang anumang mas mahusay na mga litrato ng titi?
 
And, sure enough, when I point out that the Chinese were the Rome of the West (only they managed to reform a local Empire ruled by their own ethnicity after their equivalent of Germanic Rule instead of splintering for over a millennium) and made massive contributions to the arts and sciences that match the output of Europe if not eclipse it, you dismiss all of that by saying "none of that matters now."
China NOW has a powerful, arguably entho-centric authoritarian state that maintains "peace and prosperity" about as well as the West's most successful example of the same. Honestly, WNs should see in China a successful model to emulate for their own ethnostate; but they refuse, because of how hard their concepts of the White Race are married to Liberalism and Enlightenment ideals.

Key phrase here: History, as a whole. Sometimes, you don't know the score until late in the "game". The Chinese did many great things, but they fell behind the west by the Industrial Revolution at latest, around when they also became European colonial subjects (de jure or de facto through spheres of influence). When China did end up developing, it Westernized using our innovations. We didn't Sinify (?). They copied us well, but it was copying regardless.

Actually, it's funny you mention China as a model for an ethnostate bc an increasing number of alt-right personalities like Richard Spencer and Eric Striker see it that way too. Def not a club you'd want to be a member of. Not a fan of the Enlightenment either, and the Chinese benefit hugely from their illiberalism and racial homogeneity. But the fact is, we civilized those people (and Japan, Singapore, Korea, etc..), not the other way around.

I won't deny (and never have) that the West is in decline, compared to China which is rising once again.
 
Key phrase here: History, as a whole. Sometimes, you don't know the score until late in the "game". The Chinese did many great things, but they fell behind the west by the Industrial Revolution at latest, around when they also became European colonial subjects (de jure or de facto through spheres of influence). When China did end up developing, it Westernized using our innovations. We didn't Sinify (?). They copied us well, but it was copying regardless.

Actually, it's funny you mention China as a model for an ethnostate bc an increasing number of alt-right personalities like Richard Spencer and Eric Striker see it that way too. Def not a club you'd want to be a member of. Not a fan of the Enlightenment either, and the Chinese benefit hugely from their illiberalism and racial homogeneity. But the fact is, we civilized those people (and Japan, Singapore, Korea, etc..), not the other way around.

I won't deny (and never have) that the West is in decline, compared to China which is rising once again.
I see we are the kind of idiot that thinks history has "winners" and "losers" and follows a narrative, instead of being things happening one after another.
The Flip who thinks he's the next Hitler's funnier than you- he's insane, you're just a dullard convinced you're part of the Next Big Idea.
EDIT: Also, the fact that people like Spencer, Anglin, and Varg fucking Vierknes (how does he not have a thread already?) are your current thought leaders bodes about as well as the current crop of Communist guiding lights do to their movement maintaining future relevance.
 
Last edited:
WNs on the internet always remind me of the apocryphal version of the story of Cnut*, a king convinced of their own potency, reeeing at the advancing tide, unaware that said tide will roll in regardless of how anyone feels about it and then, in due course, roll back again.
Kicking and screaming about segregation and hard borders, deportation and repatriation is fine, just watch out for your feet getting wet, boys.

*
Cnut gets a raw deal from the popularly mis-remembered story; he was actually demonstrating to his toadying courtiers that, in spite of his demonstrable power and authority, some things, like the tide or forces of nature, cannot be gainsaid or prevented. Secular power coming secondary to the power of God and all that.
 
I see we are the kind of idiot that thinks history has "winners" and "losers" and follows a narrative, instead of being things happening one after another.
The Flip who thinks he's the next Hitler's funnier than you- he's insane, you're just a dullard convinced you're part of the Next Big Idea.
EDIT: Also, the fact that people like Spencer, Anglin, and Varg fucking Vierknes (how does he not have a thread already?) are your current thought leaders bodes about as well as the current crop of Communist guiding lights due to their movement maintaining future relevance.

It was a metaphor. Are some civilizations not more advanced than others, and can you not compare their trajectories of advancement over time?

That's pretty haughty coming from a guy who, by all indications, is some sort of lame-ass South Park Republican. Who are your thought leaders, Dave Rubin and Chris Ray Gun?
 
That's pretty haughty coming from a guy who, by all indications, is some sort of lame-ass South Park Republican. Who are your thought leaders, Dave Rubin and Chris Ray Gun?
He's a Christian Anarchist. Something much worse and even more contradictory as most influential Anarchist thinkers could tell you.
 
It was a metaphor. Are some civilizations not more advanced than others, and can you not compare their trajectories of advancement over time?

That's pretty haughty coming from a guy who, by all indications, is some sort of lame-ass South Park Republican. Who are your thought leaders, Dave Rubin and Chris Ray Gun?
Jesus of Nazareth, St. Paul of Tarsus, St. Augustine of Hippo, St. Thomas Aquinas, and all the great Doctors of the Church, with my personal mention going to Soren Kirkengaard: a brother in Christ and the last mystic of this age.
 
Back