Plagued The Alt-Right

[RichardMongler]

This thread could've hell of a lot better and sumptuous if you didn't prematurely lock it. Now people are gonna have to go back and search the exceptional antics and behaviors from the last 2+ years.

Fucking Null

It doesn't take a genius to see why Null locked this thread when you have pages of braindead takes from people who don't seek out non-liberal or non-leftist opinions. I suspect the reason this thread's getting unlocked is because the alt-right has been undergoing a protracted period of self-immolation since the fallout of Unite the Right and everybody's feuding with each other. Inability to confront the rampant demonetization / deplatforming and factionalism (along with the internecine squabbling that inevitably follows) together have destroyed the alt-right. Woke Capital simply exploited the left to neutralize the dissident right, and pretty soon, they'll turn on the radical left once they prove to be a problem for profits.

@A Humble Ewok is on the right track, but I'll fill in the gaps.

It's difficult to say who coined the term (some say Paul Gottfried), but Richard Spencer played an instrumental role popularizing the term "alt-right" with his former website Alternative Right. At its core, the Alternative Right (or alt-right) is big tent politics for young paleoconservatives, disillusioned former Libertarians and racist liberals / nationalists. Much like Occupy Wall Street, the alt-right is a loose coalition of disparate elements with radically different belief systems. You can have LaVeyan Satanists, white ethnonationalists / white nationalists, Christian fundamentalists a la Common Filth (despite his attacks on the alt-right, he's still followed by a good number of them), Traditionalist Catholics, Eastern Orthodox converts, neomonarchists, neoreactionaries, various elements of the manosphere, European Neopagans and all other similarly minded people claiming to be alt-right.

The common denominators are:

• Anti-globalism. Funny since progressives were the champions of the anti-globalization movement in the '90s and early/mid '00s. Now, the tables have turned.
• Anti-status quo.
• Anti-egalitarianism. If anything divides the left and right sharper, it's the question of equality, and the alt-right sees it as a cancer.
• Anti-political correctness.
• Anti-feminism
• Anti-anti-racism.
• Anti-anti-sexism.

Only a small minority of the alt-right consists of bonafide Fascists or National Socialists, and they are often savagely attacked and ridiculed (as "14/88" types) by other alt-righters. Conversely, Fascists hate the alt-right, particularly because they feel that, unlike Fascism, the alt-right has no systematic framework from which to govern.

For those of you who've been led to believe the alt-right and Fascism can comfortably coalesce, dispel those misconceptions now and read the following:

• Why the Alt-Right Is Gay
• Zero Tolerance
• Anti-Intellectualism
• The Missing NPI Speaker
• The Face of Decay

And if we now discuss most recent history, we have to look to the appearance of the “Altright“, which we likewise have criticized time and again, and one of the articles by Max Macro had likewise drawn that distinct parallel between its advocates and those of the liberal mindset, using the “elegant dinner party” simile.

The Altright represents a new wave of “former” liberals who discovered undesirables in their gated community and who want to change the state of affairs, however they have presented themselves in such vague terms while using our themes, symbols and parts of our narratives to such a degree that it became unclear at first glance as to whether they are our allies or not. However the real nature of Altright revealed itself quick enough during the course of this US presidential election, namely that of being the same liberals who are just more internet savvy and who, for some reason, were utilizing our materials, but ultimately not to uphold our values but to secure their own petty, personal interests.

The actions of the Altright do seem to have a parallel with another action of gated community liberals, namely of white flight and gentrification: “Well we ruined this place with our liberal bullshit and can’t keep these undesirables out, time to uproot move to a new place with low property value and gentrify it, make a new gated community out of it. Oh look at that spot, it’s kind of backwards and quaint isn’t it? Let’s spruce it up a bit, what a project! Are you excited? I know I am!“

The Altright is the first ever attempt at “movement gentrification“, of attempting to subvert the tools and message of an existing movement in order to plant and secure their own petty agenda within it: “Well we ruined conservatism with our bullshit and can’t keep these niggers out, time to uproot and move to a new place, something with next to no respectability and gentrify it, make it more presentable. Oh look at that, Fascists! That’s kind of backwards and quaint isn’t it? Le’ts spruce it up a bit, what a project! I guess I don’t like democracy too much either, I’m so fashy tee-hee!“

Thus the Altright attempt to use our tools and message but then proceed to harp on issues of “presentability” and “respectability“, try to declaw and defang our methods. To an extent this is a calculated method of self-preservation against the inevitable accusations of being Nazi if you don’t keep up fast enough with the progressive parade, hence the existence of the gay term “fashy“, as a kind of cute and quaint way of belittling the idea as being no more than a joke or a meme in order to deflect the accusation. This, obviously, never works, and these people get branded as “evil nazi white supremacists” regardless, but they do serve to confuse and steer people with potential away from becoming true and full fledged Fascists and National-Socialists, offering them that last easy way out of breaking with the System and the decaying society that holds them hostage.

Below is an accurate video presentation of Altright movement gentrification, complete with parody of Dickie Spencer’s Phalanx:

We’ve even had one crystal clear example of this, when one startup movement had stolen the design of another movement’s poster and after changing the name, logos and links, “gentrified” it by removing the swastika and the word “jews” from the poster – “NOW it’s presentable!” Look up any pictures of Dickie Spencer and his attempt at a 1950s Average Man braindead smile, or the Identity Evropa rally where they all look like they are protesting shortage of caviar at their golf/tennis club, listen to the pretentious intellectual voice of Jar Jar Taylor with his retarded little bow-tie.

Other obvious tell tale signs include the attempts to pander to the mainstream media, the exultation of intellectualism over character, defense or apologetics of faggotry, which is not surprising in the least – faggots are the ultimate bourgeoisie and thus the envy of straight bourgeoisie, who would love nothing more than to get the fag couple on the block to come over to their next wine mixer and hear their comments on the newly refurbished living room, and all the wives in the gated community have been just dying for a gay best friend to be a faghag to.

https://archive.is/FGy7V/0d6548b68c99b382b8fc0aee820426c3e6017053.png

So long as the fags are white they are ALT-RIGHT with me, haha, yes, such witty banter!

Thankfully, one doesn’t have to worry about the Altright too much as its demise is inevitable, and just as the hippie protesters of the 60s seamlessly converted back to the American standard and the jewish narrative, so too will the Altright convert back to mainstream politics by means of its representatives actively seeking that and them being overrun with mainstream Trump supporters who are claiming the title for themselves. However one must avoid the danger of these liberals gentrifying potential Fascist/NS movements, while potential individual Fascists must hear loud and clear that Fascism and the Altright are in no way the same and cannot be allies by definition – a true Fascist/NS is not simply a racist liberal with bourgeoisie mindset, morality and sentimentalities and we shall not stand for people muddying our message and standing in its way as a detour that obscures the one and only path to the Truth:
And there are those that are by no means that way, and whose authors, far from being true followers of the doctrines, of which they display the visible symbols, represent in reality only themselves and use the prestige of the doctrine and the authority that it confers on them to promote their own interests, to satisfy personal grudges, or simply to give free reign to their passions.
-Savitri Devi, “The Religion of the Strong”

And for those that accuse us of “purity spiraling“, know this – we do as one of the great champions of our Worldview had instructed us to, thus proving once and for all, who we are, and who you are:

The greatness of any powerful organization, which embodies an idea in this world, depends on the absolutely religious fanaticism with which it establishes itself when compared to others. It must be fanatically convinced that it is right and just, and it must be absolutely intolerant of any idea or organization that is counter to its own teaching. If an idea is right and it takes up the sword of battle with this mind-set, it is invincible and any persecution only strengthens it.
-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf V1, Ch12

The white ethnonationalists within the alt-right can largely be seen as a predictable reaction against the feminist gender "identity politics" and anti-white groupthink that have been promoted by neoliberals and their progressive lackeys for the better half of the 20th century. It's hardly a mystery why the alt-right gained the traction they have since everyone else is aggressively promoting their own narrow ethno-nationalist or gender group interests, white heterosexual males alone are singled out and criticized whenever they start belatedly defending their own group interests. Of course, societal elites have been busily promoting their own political and economic interests all along, increasingly behind a pseudo-humanitarian globalist and multiculturalist veneer, but are doing so mainly at the expense of the American working and middle classes.

 

[Julia Fortune]

I disagree with that take on what it is, but rather than saying why, it's more prudent to point out that one of the major factors in the disintegration is that this band of identitarians had no fucking identity. What the alt-right actually was never stayed consistent for more than a few months once 2015-16 came around. Sometimes it was Christian, or at least pro-Christian. Sometimes it was nihilistic. Sometimes it was about fucking Viking Gods or some shit. Sometimes it was about establishing a literal new state, other times it's just a moral compass to abide by when shitposting. Sometimes it was pro free speech, sometimes not. I could go on and on and on.

Ultimately, it was a useless term to begin with except in the context of defining a group of speakers to be attacked.

 

[UQ 770]

The Alt-Right is such an artifact of Current Year politics. It basically never existed in the first place beyond a few exceptionals clinging to the cracks in the pavement and trying to make white nationalism hip and trendy. A bunch of people bought into Richard Spencer's hype and marketeering and actually interpreted this bullshit as a cohesive group when it was just a buzzword. Literally, it became a buzzword used in exactly the way its annoying creators intended: to characterize anything even slightly right-wing as part of their stupid white nationalist agenda. Once tarnished, so the logic went, hapless young conservatives and (this one I take personally) cynics would be forced to throw in with them after the outrage mob showed up and ruined their lives. Essentially just like how the Nazis managed to drag in disaffected conservative movements and groups from all over Germany during their own rise to power.

Except, these dumbasses didn't learn from the history they were trying to emulate. As much as they make the Weimar Rep comparison, modern America is not fucking Weimar Germany. The refugee-infested parts of Europe are not even Weimar Germany. The Nazis rose to power because people were in the throes of an intense economic depression. People were burning fucking money for warmth and starving in the streets for fuck's sake. I don't care how many foreingers threaten to rape your daughter on the way to work, at least you can still afford groceries and swing by the liquor store in between people grabbing your ass. Its just not the same situation at all, no matter how fucked up things definitely are.

So instead of uniting the right, the Alt-Right actually caused an impressively disasterous wave of people to become apolitical altogether. It is a compeltely unmitigated failure in every sense of the word and it absolutely failed to accomplish a single thing it set out to do. The Youtube Skeptics shattering with UKIP's demise as a hail mary probably broke the spell for even the most ardent liberal tards and I am fully convinced that the splintering effect we're seeing amongst SJWs is the direct result of this realization that the devil isn't real after all, the abyss does not actually stare back at you because there's nothing actually there and that Stephen Colbert is talentless a hack after all.

 

[tuscangarder]

The alt right was always gay.

I can't believe people were in here seriously trying to argue that it wasnt a white nationalist movement. All you had to do is listen to the alt-right "leaders" own words in 2016. It was clear as day. Those posts were completely disengious or people in flat out denial because they associated themselves with it.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

The alt right meaning the alternative right to the classic republicans is one thing, the 'alt right' meaning... jordan peterson stuff? Is a different thing.

I'd consider myself the first kind of 'alt-right', at least sometimes. I have no interest in youtube pundits, so I can't really comment much on the second kind.

Dumbasses should have used a less generic name for their movement if they wanted a monopoly on it.

 

[Cool kitties club]

It doesn't take a genius to see why Null locked this thread when you have pages of braindead takes from people who don't seek out non-liberal or non-leftist opinions. I suspect the reason this thread's getting unlocked is because the alt-right has been undergoing a protracted period of self-immolation since the fallout of Unite the Right and everybody's feuding with each other. Inability to confront the rampant demonetization / deplatforming and factionalism (along with the internecine squabbling that inevitably follows) together have destroyed the alt-right. Woke Capital simply exploited the left to neutralize the dissident right, and pretty soon, they'll turn on the radical left once they prove to be a problem for profits.

@A Humble Ewok is on the right track, but I'll fill in the gaps.

It's difficult to say who coined the term (some say Paul Gottfried), but Richard Spencer played an instrumental role popularizing the term "alt-right" with his former website Alternative Right. At its core, the Alternative Right (or alt-right) is big tent politics for young paleoconservatives, disillusioned former Libertarians and racist liberals / nationalists. Much like Occupy Wall Street, the alt-right is a loose coalition of disparate elements with radically different belief systems. You can have LaVeyan Satanists, white ethnonationalists / white nationalists, Christian fundamentalists a la Common Filth (despite his attacks on the alt-right, he's still followed by a good number of them), Traditionalist Catholics, Eastern Orthodox converts, neomonarchists, neoreactionaries, various elements of the manosphere, European Neopagans and all other similarly minded people claiming to be alt-right.

The common denominators are:

• Anti-globalism. Funny since progressives were the champions of the anti-globalization movement in the '90s and early/mid '00s. Now, the tables have turned.
• Anti-status quo.
• Anti-egalitarianism. If anything divides the left and right sharper, it's the question of equality, and the alt-right sees it as a cancer.
• Anti-political correctness.
• Anti-feminism
• Anti-anti-racism.
• Anti-anti-sexism.

Only a small minority of the alt-right consists of bonafide Fascists or National Socialists, and they are often savagely attacked and ridiculed (as "14/88" types) by other alt-righters. Conversely, Fascists hate the alt-right, particularly because they feel that, unlike Fascism, the alt-right has no systematic framework from which to govern.

For those of you who've been led to believe the alt-right and Fascism can comfortably coalesce, dispel those misconceptions now and read the following:

• Why the Alt-Right Is Gay
• Zero Tolerance
• Anti-Intellectualism
• The Missing NPI Speaker
• The Face of Decay

The white ethnonationalists within the alt-right can largely be seen as a predictable reaction against the feminist gender "identity politics" and anti-white groupthink that have been promoted by neoliberals and their progressive lackeys for the better half of the 20th century. It's hardly a mystery why the alt-right gained the traction they have since everyone else is aggressively promoting their own narrow ethno-nationalist or gender group interests, white heterosexual males alone are singled out and criticized whenever they start belatedly defending their own group interests. Of course, societal elites have been busily promoting their own political and economic interests all along, increasingly behind a pseudo-humanitarian globalist and multiculturalist veneer, but are doing so mainly at the expense of the American working and middle classes.

The alt right started as a lose coalition of anti establishment right wing ideas running the gambit from white nationalists to trad cons to fascists to more radical libertarians. This however, was all thrown at the window when Richard b spencer (self proclaimed leader of the alt right) said “hail trump, hail victory, hail our people” probably one of the worst things you could have possibly said and caused the media to go into a frenzy of “leader of alt right says nazi rhetoric”. This caused anyone watch wasn’t a hardcore whitenat or fascist to run with their tails between their legs to other labels like dissent right, neo reactionary, or just plain old ones like conservative, anti-progressive, or libertarian lest they be called a Nazi. That one moment turned the alt right from a semi viable anti progressive movement into a purity spiral of white nat bitch boys purity spiraling, making “funny” kill all minority jokes xd, saying slurs (hahhaha I said nigger I’m so funny and edgy), and in general just ignoring most actually policy or political plans in exchange for “if we remove ze low iq blacks and da evil juden then all of society will be perfect”. They also relied too much on new atheist thinking (if something is true then people must believe it) with tax realism. They just assumed that if they could prove race realism then all the progressives would just roll up on their bellies and all white people would become whitenats. When in reality progressives have whole propaganda wings dedicated to disproving ideas they don’t like, and they could very well use race realism to prove white privilege is real (just because something is natural doesn’t mean it’s good).
Here are videos on the subject:

Spoiler

Here’s a whole playlist

 

[Doctor of Autism]

Unsure if this counts but I remembered someone on the Alt Right made these Disney parody songs that are highly autistic.

 

[NiggerFaggot1488]

The "alt-right" as a "thing" ceased to exist in its original form after Trump was elected. It started out as a vaguely associated group of people who liked to troll liberals and neocons on social media, especially Twitter. It was a very fun time and they really didn't know what to do about us. As with any hot new trend, social parasites latch on and try to gain fame and influence for themselves over it. By early 2017 people were dissociating themselves from the label because weirdo fags like Richard Spencer were latching onto it, and smart people didn't want anything to do with him or with IRL activism, we were too busy supporting Trump.

 

[AF 802]

the virgin alt-rightist vs the chad politically apathetic

 

[A Logging Company]

The alt right was intentionally fuzzy in its definition because they knew once it was defined, the (((powers that be))) would start undermining it. Then Richard Spencer, Milo, and Thernovith all declared themselves to be leaders of the alt right and the rest is history. The alt right hated the idea of leaders because they knew it was going to be co-opted. Looks like they were right.

I wish I could find all the old podcasts Spencer did before he nuked the original site, because I distinctly remember Spencer at one point saying it was a vague big tent, and even he was not sure of where it was going (also I'd like to hear the episode they did with financial analyst Gonzalo Lira, before his incarnation as "Coach Red Pill").

If you want some old drama that highlights the origins of the confusion, on Christmas day of 2014 or 2015 (can't remember exactly) Spencer annihilated alternativeright.com, having it redirect to Radix, leaving no way to view old podcast and archives. He didn't consult with then editors Collin and Andy. Spencer put out a statement saying he thought Alternative Right had done its job and outlived its use as a site and concept (lol). Andy's responce was one of dispare and confusion, Collin's was pure Scottish rage, both responses typical for the two.

But despite Spencer's claim the term alt-right had outlived its usefulness, it had caught on outside his sphere of influence, on other outfits like TheRightStuff.biz and 4chan's /pol/. I may comeback to this post to edit it further, but this should do for now.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

A lot of people here are saying that the alt-right doesn't refer to itself as such anymore, which is true, but their ideas are very much still out there in the form of Nick Fuentes and his "groyper" followers. Fuentes did livestreams with various other lolcows like Stephen "Destiny" Bonnell and Carl Benjamin so he's clearly connected to the culture, and the beliefs that he expresses on his show (support for a fundamentalist ethnostate through edgy meme humour) are very similar. The movement rebranded to get away from a negative label (which they created themselves) and many of its former leaders like Richard Spencer and Milo are now largely forgotten, but it never actually died.

 

[RichardMongler]

A lot of people here are saying that the alt-right doesn't refer to itself as such anymore, which is true, but their ideas are very much still out there in the form of Nick Fuentes and his "groyper" followers. Fuentes did livestreams with various other lolcows like Stephen "Destiny" Bonnell and Carl Benjamin so he's clearly connected to the culture, and the beliefs that he expresses on his show (support for a fundamentalist ethnostate through edgy meme humour) are very similar. The movement rebranded to get away from a negative label (which they created themselves) and many of its former leaders like Richard Spencer and Milo are now largely forgotten, but it never actually died.

Dissident right is less of an alt-right rebrand and more of an attempt to bring back big tent politics for the right that the alt-right previously tried and disastrously failed at. Paleoconservatives and the alt-right share some similarities (and, as @A Humble Ewok pointed out, several prominent figures within the Paleocon movement crossed over into the alt-right), but the two are ultimately different in how they approach politics. The biggest hope is that their shared opposition to radical liberalism (perhaps liberalism itself) and leftism would unite them all in the culture wars. When you try to place radical right-libertarians (AnCaps and other such ideologues), Libertarians (for the less radical but still right of center), Paleoconservatives, Christian fundamentalists and White Nationalists under one roof, you're going to have serious conflicts of interest over politics and principles:

As you can see, some people on the dissident right find the Groyper Wars less than impressive despite producing the wonderful spectacle of taking Charlie Kirk to task over his commitment to Conservatism. Just because Paleocons and the alt-right hate Conservatism, Inc. doesn't mean they're going to put apart their serious ideological differences in the long run. Indeed, the biggest problem the alt-right has with Paleocons like Nick Fuentes is their aversion of revolution and belief in an America that cannot exist peacefully post-globalization. The alt-right knows that, for politics to mean anything, it takes blood and guts to enact lasting change, and people like Nick Fuentes depend on liberalism's long term existence.

And then, you have the Fascists a la IronMarch. I will direct you to the very first post on this page rather than repeat myself for the umpteenth time.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Dissident right is less of an alt-right rebrand and more of an attempt to bring back big tent politics for the right that the alt-right previously tried and disastrously failed at. Paleoconservatives and the alt-right share some similarities (and, as @A Humble Ewok pointed out, several prominent figures within the Paleocon movement crossed over into the alt-right), but the two are ultimately different in how they approach politics. The biggest hope is that their shared opposition to radical liberalism (perhaps liberalism itself) and leftism would unite them all in the culture wars. When you try to place radical right-libertarians (AnCaps and other such ideologues), Libertarians (for the less radical but still right of center), Paleoconservatives, Christian fundamentalists and White Nationalists under one roof, you're going to have serious conflicts of interest over politics and principles:
View attachment 1020051
As you can see, some people on the dissident right find the Groyper Wars less than impressive despite producing the wonderful spectacle of taking Charlie Kirk to task over his commitment to Conservatism. Just because Paleocons and the alt-right hate Conservatism, Inc. doesn't mean they're going to put apart their serious ideological differences in the long run. Indeed, the biggest problem the alt-right has with Paleocons like Nick Fuentes is their aversion of revolution and belief in an America that cannot exist peacefully post-globalization. The alt-right knows that, for politics to mean anything, it takes blood and guts to enact lasting change, and people like Nick Fuentes depend on liberalism's long term existence.

And then, you have the Fascists a la IronMarch. I will direct you to the very first post on this page rather than repeat myself for the umpteenth time.

Obviously the entire far-right doesn't support Fuentes, but The Daily Stormer supports him staunchly and also supported the alt-right back in 2016. At the very least there's a very large crossover between the groups, even if they're not exactly the same.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

It was a "big tent" before Richard Spencer ruined the fucking brand.

alternatively, spencer is an fbi nigger like david duke, but at some point it's just got to be weird incompetence

 

[Pointless Pedant]

It was a "big tent" before Richard Spencer ruined the fucking brand.

alternatively, spencer is an fbi nigger like david duke, but at some point it's just got to be weird incompetence

Given how many lolcows are in the movement we know it's the latter.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Interesting. Twitter agitator Douglass Mackey ('Ricky Vaughn'), known for his ties to online conservative forum 'My Posting Career' (a more cancerous Somethingawful spinoff) was involved with a company called 'Smartcheckr', run by his paymaster, Richard Schwartz.

It's come out this month that Smartcheckr is behind a project called 'Clearview AI'. Other edgy conservative types involved in Clearview AI include Peter Thiel, Chuck Johnson, and Pax Dickinson.

Apparently, Mackey's role at Smartcheckr involved collecting Facebook profiles of far-right people, including gaining access to controversial GOP candidate Paul Nehlen's Facebook followers by offering to provide services to improve his targeting of advertising to potential supporters.

So let's look at a couple news stories related to Smartcheckr/Clearview AI:

• 'The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It' (discussed on A&H here)
• 'Clearview AI founder linked to Trump world and Far-Right, NYPD denies facial recognition firm's boast that it helped catch terrorist suspect'

The 'terrorist subject' who Smartcheckr claims to have identified (though the NYPD denies it) seems to have been some random white guy from West Virginia who left some rice cookers around in the subway for laughs.

Hmm.. so basically, Mackey seems to have been collecting images and metadata related to right-wingers so that his boss Richard Schwartz could use it to scan surveillance video and arrest them (or fit them up) for discarding kitchenware, graffiti, etc? Very interesting.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Alt-right homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos feuding with conservative homosexual Patrick Casey about Trump's prioritization of Israel's interest over America's.

https://archive.is/CWPcY#selection-4433.0-4439.4

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

The 'terrorist subject' who Smartcheckr claims to have identified (though the NYPD denies it) seems to have been some random white guy from West Virginia who left some rice cookers around in the subway for laughs.

An interesting piece on Smartcheckr came out today on HuffPo of all places.

Among the people associated with the founders of this company dedicated to providing tools for police to identify right-wing dissidents through image-matching- none other than KF member and Hebraic 'nazi' Andrew "weev" Aurenheimer. How very, very interesting.

https://archive.is/JqKnC

 

[who dare wins?]

Alt-right homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos feuding with conservative homosexual Patrick Casey about Trump's prioritization of Israel's interest over America's.
View attachment 1127091
https://archive.li/CWPcY#selection-4433.0-4439.4

THe modern alt right has basically dissolved into either neo cons or legitimate fascists/ethnic nationalists, that is the truth. From the very get go milo was not exactly a good infuence/influencer within the Alte right especially when he wants to fuck kids. He's pretty much ever since then been latching onto whatever he can find and now he has created a echo chamber full of hypocrites (similar to jovi val, who literally fought a seigefag IRL and lost)

It was a "big tent" before Richard Spencer ruined the fucking brand.

alternatively, spencer is an fbi nigga like david duke, but at some point it's just got to be weird incompetence

spencer was always a fed and he did his fed job right by pushing everyone out. Everyone has either gone further right or towards the left.

 

[Terrorist]

Remember fashy goys, there are only 2 political strategies:

1. Stay inside and post frogs until the ethnostate is somehow willed into existence through sheer good optics and overton window shifting
2. Put on a plastic stahlhelm and get beaten up by human toilets and "Antifa Waluigi"

Nobody has any other ideas so you gotta choose one. Will you choose the My Entryism Career of successful GOP infiltrator Nick Fuentes, or build a trailer park podcast army with Matt Heimbach and friends? Such a hard decision amirite!

Speaking of Ratt Heimbach:

Interesting. Twitter agitator Douglass Mackey ('Ricky Vaughn'), known for his ties to online conservative forum 'My Posting Career' (a more cancerous Somethingawful spinoff) was involved with a company called 'Smartcheckr', run by his paymaster, Richard Schwartz.

It's come out this month that Smartcheckr is behind a project called 'Clearview AI'. Other edgy conservative types involved in Clearview AI include Peter Thiel, Chuck Johnson, and Pax Dickinson.

Apparently, Mackey's role at Smartcheckr involved collecting Facebook profiles of far-right people, including gaining access to controversial GOP candidate Paul Nehlen's Facebook followers by offering to provide services to improve his targeting of advertising to potential supporters.

So let's look at a couple news stories related to Smartcheckr/Clearview AI:

• 'The Secretive Company That Might End Privacy as We Know It' (discussed on A&H here)
• 'Clearview AI founder linked to Trump world and Far-Right, NYPD denies facial recognition firm's boast that it helped catch terrorist suspect'

The 'terrorist subject' who Smartcheckr claims to have identified (though the NYPD denies it) seems to have been some random white guy from West Virginia who left some rice cookers around in the subway for laughs.

Hmm.. so basically, Mackey seems to have been collecting images and metadata related to right-wingers so that his boss Richard Schwartz could use it to scan surveillance video and arrest them (or fit them up) for discarding kitchenware, graffiti, etc? Very interesting.

Very interesting. It never made sense why "Ricky" agreed to help Nehlen, since he was an optics fanatic and Nehlen had the worst optics ever...now we know. People really should've been more suspicious when he said he had connections.