The Alt-Right - The Off Topic Sperging Containment Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Considering the huge number of cosmetic surgeries to look more white that Asians like Koreans do, there's a good chance that people might do it anyway.
(China and Japan are the only nations in which Genetic Modification is legal IIRC)

Pretty sure some parents would wanna do it to make their daughter more marriageable as even if whites did become a minority people would still want their children to look attractive by Western Standards which was created largely by Caucasian people.
The difference between cosmetic surgery and in-utero genetic modification for cosmetic purposes is huge. The first involves informed consent. The second is done to someone who has no say in the matter, and tampering with genes could cause a load of issues later on in life - we don't have enough data really.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Corrigan
The difference between cosmetic surgery and in-utero genetic modification for cosmetic purposes is huge. The first involves informed consent. The second is done to someone who has no say in the matter, and tampering with genes could cause a load of issues later on in life - we don't have enough data really.
I'm not talking about ethical grounds, I'm talking about people who are desperate enough for their daughter to marry into some well to do family that they modify their baby daughter to be a Pamela Anderson.

If they can, some people would do it regardless of whatever ethical questions it brings up.
 
Last edited:
I'm not talking about ethical grounds, I'm talking about people who are desperate enough for their daughter to marry into some well to do family that they modify their baby daughter to be a Pamela Anderson.
Which is ethically dodgy as fuck.
 
Which is ethically dodgy as fuck.
It is but when we reach the point in which Genetic modification is a reality some Central Asian, East Asian, or African, or someone else from either a strongly traditional family oriented culture or a poor region would be willing to pay top dollar if their child would look more attractive Western-wise as that is where all the money is, and they would do so even if it was illegal via Black Market means.

Just replying to the whole
exactly the kind of point where everyone agrees science has gone too far.
that you said as a huge amount of the World's population lives in non-Western, Tradtional, and extermely family oriented regions of the world and in those places there has been/is Child Marriages, Forced Marriages where they kidnapp people from other tribes and nations, and all sorts of stuff. Even Ghost Marriages where they kill women so that their child was married if they died, genetically modifying a fetus so that will become attractive would be a cake-walk for these people.

I believe that genetically modifying cosmetically would be illegal in most cases when the techology comes, but that wouldn't stop someone from trying to do it regardless.

When you take into account the entire world, even stuff that in the West seem common like gays shouldn't be punished is an extereme viewpoint.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Techpriest
The alt-right feels almost like the new Gamergate. On one side, you've got the self-important autists who feel like they're part of the next cultural revolution, and on the other, there's the folks who simultaneously deride them as neckbeard losers and genuinely fear they're going to bring the apocalypse.

Does the alt-right even exist in meatspace? Where are the congressmen and governors who are unambiguously vocal in their support of it, and actually say "alt-right"? (aside from Trump, of course.)

I'm thinking that the alt-right is the Left's equivalent of Emmanuel Goldstein, or perhaps a fnord. An all-purpose snarl word that can be applied broadly to anyone for the crime of wrongthink.
 
Does the alt-right even exist in meatspace? Where are the congressmen and governors who are unambiguously vocal in their support of it, and actually say "alt-right"? (aside from Trump, of course.)

I'm thinking that the alt-right is the Left's equivalent of Emmanuel Goldstein, or perhaps a fnord. An all-purpose snarl word that can be applied broadly to anyone for the crime of wrongthink.

The difference being that it is implied that Emmanuel Goldstein might not even exist in 1984, while the alt-right is a very real thing.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GL99
I'm sure this question has been brought up dozens of times in this very thread, but is there a recognized dissonance between the alt-right and two of their biggest heroes (Milo and Jared Taylor) being worshipers of the Jew on a stick?
 
found some people on /pol/ spreading this around.

24Rkdhq.png


I miss it when they were less hot headed and wren't mindless frog worshippers. I blame R_TheDonald
Why does every subculture devolve to this kind of utter shit? Is it just that every human is inherently a sperg?
 
Back