US The Army is launching a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting to reverse enlistment shortfalls - While the Army will still look at increased bonuses and push the health care and education funding in the military, money is not likely to be a key driver for recruits.

1000.png


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Army is launching a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting to focus more on young people who have spent time in college or are job hunting early in their careers, as it scrambles to reverse years of enlistment shortfalls.

A major part of this is the formation of a new professional force of recruiters instead of relying on soldiers randomly assigned to the task.

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth, in an interview with The Associated Press, said some of the changes will begin in the next 90 days but a wholesale transformation will take years.

“We have not been recruiting very well for many more years than one would think from just looking at the headlines in the last 18 months,” Wormuth said, adding that the Army hasn’t met its annual goal for new enlistment contracts since 2014.

Last year, the Army fell 15,000 short of its enlistment goal of 60,000 while competing with higher-paying companies in a tight job market and trying to overcome two years of the coronavirus pandemic, which shut down access to schools and public events. In the fiscal year that ended Saturday, the Army brought in a bit more than 50,000 recruits, falling short of the publicly stated “stretch goal” of 65,000.

Army officials, however, said that number still allows the service to meet its required total strength of 452,000. They said the Army also signed up an additional 4,600 recruits for future contracts, in an effort to build back the pool of delayed-entry recruits, which had eroded. Those recruits will go to basic training over the next year.

On Tuesday, Wormuth told reporters in a briefing that the Army has not yet decided what the new fiscal year’s recruiting goal will be, but said it would likely be less than 65,000. The lower number, she said, also reflects the fact that the size of the Army has been shrinking from the 485,000 level during the peaks of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

In testimony before Congress during his confirmation hearing, Gen. Randy George, who is now chief of staff of the Army, called recruiting " the No. 1 challenge that we face and the one thing that we have to be focused on.” And he said the service must better tailor its messaging and marketing.

The Navy and the Air Force also fell short of their recruitment goals for the fiscal year that ended Saturday, but leaders said both did better than predictions earlier this year. The Marine Corps and the tiny Space Force have said they would meet their enlistment targets.

Marine leaders, including Brig. Gen. Walker Field, who heads the Corps’ eastern recruiting region, have said one key to their success is choosing the right recruiters and encouraging successful ones to stay on. The Marines are also repositioning recruiting stations to areas where populations have grown.

The Army’s recruiting increase this year is considered a short-term victory made possible by a number of new and upgraded programs and benefits. But Wormuth said it will take systemic changes in how the Army approaches the labor market and sells the service as a career to turn things around.

At the same time, she said the Army must concentrate on the things it can change since there are many things it cannot, such as lack of fitness among youths and unwillingness to serve.

While recruiters have long relied heavily on high school seniors or graduates to fill the ranks, Wormuth said they need to reach beyond that pool and seek applicants on job sites like ZipRecruiter, Indeed or Glassdoor.

“The vast majority of people who are out there making employment decisions are people who have more than a high school education,” Wormuth said. “We need to figure out how to talk to that much broader labor market.”

She said that as more students go on to college, high school graduates now make up just 15% to 20% of the labor market. And the Army gets about half of its recruits from that shrinking population.

“We are not abandoning the high school market by any means,” Wormuth said, but by 2028 she wants the Army to have one-third of its recruits to have more than a high school diploma, rather than the current one-fifth,.

Part of that is showcasing the Army’s higher-tech jobs with computers, satellites and artificial intelligence to lure those who may still think of the service as just infantry troops.

The other major change, which will begin to form in the coming months, is the transition to a professional recruiting workforce. Rather than using soldiers who are “voluntold” to take on a special assignment as recruiters, the Army is establishing a new permanent and specialized enlistment workforce.

There are currently about 8,000 Army recruiters, and only a bit more than a third have recruiting as their actual job classification.

The change will mirror how private companies work and will take several years. But Wormuth said the Army will quickly start a pilot program to begin identifying and training the new force. As part of the process, the Army will use a new aptitude test designed to identify soldiers who have a higher potential for being successful recruiters.

Other changes will include planning larger Army career fairs and restructuring the command leadership, elevating the head of recruiting to a three-star job with a four-year term for more continuity.

And, while the Army will still look at increased bonuses and push the health care and education funding in the military, money is not likely to be a key driver for recruits. And recruiters will need to sell the less tangible benefits of service.

“At the end of the day, I think that what offsets what we don’t offer in terms of compensation we make up for with being part of something bigger,” Wormuth said. “Ask anyone wearing a uniform in my office. They will tell you that what keeps them re-enlisting or staying until 20 years or beyond is the people and doing something that really matters.”

Article Link

Archive
 
These are retarded chimps with power that think they're geniuses for burning down a country with them in it.
Despite currently dwelling in said country; they have money and a passport and can easily vacate it until the internal strife dies down. The rich/elite don't care, they can just go elsewhere.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fagnacious D
Despite currently dwelling in said country; they have money and a passport and can easily vacate it until the internal strife dies down. The rich/elite don't care, they can just go elsewhere.
There are only so many places on earth where one can pull the same heavily-broadcasted scheme and expect to get away with it. In this case, it's the entire Western World. You telling me the slant-eyes who think they're the best by divine right and the brown-skins that kill each other over less are going to tolerate it?
 
There are only so many places on earth where one can pull the same heavily-broadcasted scheme and expect to get away with it. In this case, it's the entire Western World. You telling me the slant-eyes who think they're the best by divine right and the brown-skins that kill each other over less are going to tolerate it?
As long as their Mandate of Heaven is tied into the global banking scheme, yes. I also take into account that OurGreatestAlly™ is no doubt willing to nuke whoever it wants, once the USA's standing military is shown to be fat and retarded. The Chinese may hold off, but most of the browns and darkers are dumber than they'd like to admit and will be too busy doing ghetto shit to notice. Every country is gonna wind up like Brazil/South Africa, because we've somehow let ourselves be petrified at the thought of someone calling us racist.
 
I mean they use H1B Visas everywhere else why not just make an american foriegn legion

It works for the surrender monkeys
The French actually vet their legionaries and make them learn French and adopt French culture. We can't vet them or make our legionaries learn English and adopt US culture because doing all that would be racist.
 
Yeah, good luck with that. Not unless they're targeting people who are desperate and on hard times they're never hitting that recruitment goal. Among the numerous issues now it's just financially not worth it. If you're working a full time job for about $14 or $15 you'd be making more than most recruits. The only real financial advantage to enlistment is the free board but if you're set with that then there's no reason to bother.
 
I just saw several ads for the US military.

Featuring just white guys, doing really cool shit.

Even a Marine ad showing some white guys rushing a machinegun.

And an Air Force ad showing all white male pilots.

Yup, we're going to war and getting a fucking draft.
Well if the draft is brought back literally January of next year, 2024 is literally the LAST possible year I can get conscripted because I'll be turning 25 that year. Because of how the lottery works, they will have to sift through 11 million plus men before they get to me, so I am not that worried. The most anyone was drafted was over 10 million for WW2 and over 2 million for WW1, Vietnam, and Korea, averaging somewhere around 4 million for all four conflicts. Just gotta take one day at a time.
 
> Be Army
> Promote troons, obese negresses and wahmens into leadership roles they are unqualified for and are not capable of carrying out.
> "WhY aReN't WhItE mEn EnLiStInG?"
> Continue Diversity Promotion

Many such cases.

When the fuck did the military forget that a fighting force needs to be unified, and the simplest way to unify people is through race or religion? Oh, that's right, the military is no longer run by men or even by actual soldiers.
 
People don't want to die fighting for a war that we shouldn't be in.
wow, how bigoted
Well if the draft is brought back literally January of next year, 2024 is literally the LAST possible year I can get conscripted because I'll be turning 25 that year. Because of how the lottery works, they will have to sift through 11 million plus men before they get to me, so I am not that worried. The most anyone was drafted was over 10 million for WW2 and over 2 million for WW1, Vietnam, and Korea, averaging somewhere around 4 million for all four conflicts. Just gotta take one day at a time.
>implying they wouldn't raise the age of the draft if they'd have the balls to institute it in the first place
 
wow, how bigoted

>implying they wouldn't raise the age of the draft if they'd have the balls to institute it in the first place
Still, 11 million is a lot of people. Going into something like this, as an adage I've followed most of my life, I have to possibly expect the worst because I don't know what's going to happen. None of us do. So that only thing someone in my position CAN do is expect the worst but hope for the best. Just take one day at a time.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: God of Nothing
Well if the draft is brought back literally January of next year, 2024 is literally the LAST possible year I can get conscripted because I'll be turning 25 that year. Because of how the lottery works, they will have to sift through 11 million plus men before they get to me, so I am not that worried. The most anyone was drafted was over 10 million for WW2 and over 2 million for WW1, Vietnam, and Korea, averaging somewhere around 4 million for all four conflicts. Just gotta take one day at a time.
I wouldn't be shocked if they were so blatant to base this draft on your race and what part of the country you live in.
 
Woe to those of us who will be forcibly called back to service even if we are out of the IRR.
 
Well if the draft is brought back literally January of next year, 2024 is literally the LAST possible year I can get conscripted because I'll be turning 25 that year. Because of how the lottery works, they will have to sift through 11 million plus men before they get to me, so I am not that worried. The most anyone was drafted was over 10 million for WW2 and over 2 million for WW1, Vietnam, and Korea, averaging somewhere around 4 million for all four conflicts. Just gotta take one day at a time.
Boy are you in for a shock about the draft.

  • They can draft you up to age 35. (Thanks, Obama)
  • Other people will be scrambling to be disqualified.
  • The overweight and sick won't qualify.
  • College students won't qualify.
  • Women won't qualify.
  • Drug busts and felons won't qualify.
  • HS education or higher.
  • Critical jobs aren't drafted and get deferment.
  • It's well known that it hits poor and working class more often.
  • There's long standing rumors that the Draft board tilts toward red states and Republican areas.

You say that now, but wait until you're seeing the draft board post the numbers and sweating, wondering if yours is next.

Woe to those of us who will be forcibly called back to service even if we are out of the IRR.
I want to see them call back the TDRL and PDRL listings. That's when you KNOW they're desperate.
 
Back