- Joined
- May 5, 2022
The only incentive to not go for violence is the implicit threat they'll just sic muslim rape gangs on your family while you're in jail and getting killed. Which might happen anyways so it's not really an incentive since most people can't afford 24/7 security with firearms ready to shoot people.I was going to say if you're getting hard time of 2-20 years for protesting and being a nuisance you might as well actually go for violence.
Like I think a rebellion was started because the punishment for being late was death so it made more sense to launch a rebellion.
If you're going to be sent 15 years because you said Pakis go home and actual terrorism charges against Ira and UVA guys is only like 20-25 years for actual terrorism like car bombs and assainations like there is zero incentive to not go for violence.
Sorry for the double post.
I guess this is a reversed South Africa speedrun that the bong goverment feels like shoving down the plebs for "economic reasons".
I do wonder, how cohesive the remaining native British population is. If they're so defined by party loyalties (or in Northern Ireland by religion), I'm not sure they'll be able to stand by those behind the wire when internment comes back. Battle of Athens in the US is a good example of this, they kicked out the government only to be split worse by their pre-existing loyalties.
Last edited: