Culture The Bull Pit - Pitbull News Megathread - aka sperginity speds out agendaposting

https://www.cheknews.ca/pit-bull-attack-near-nanaimo-injures-two-children-and-one-woman-450395/

https://archive.ph/8jiC9

Two 8-month-old pit bulls that were loose in Nanaimo attacked several children, severely injuring at least one. Other people that came to aid the children were also injured.

The children were playing in a yard at the house of one of their friends. The dogs were from somewhere else in the neighborhood and had been cited for being at large previously.

One of the owners of the dogs came and got the dogs but did not stick around. The news interviewed the other owner, a Dangerhair that looked to be in her late 40s or early 50s. While she was devastated at what her dogs had done, she said to the reporter, "People are saying, look at this from the prospective of a parent, well, these dogs are my kids, too," and then she broke down crying.

It was later reported both dogs were euthanized, as there have been other incidents prior to this one, and due to the severity of the injuries the one particular child sustained.

To the dangerhair dog owner I would have to say, "If these dogs were your KIDS, you did a lousy job of raising them. Thank heavens you didn't spawn any of your own."

 

[SITHRAK!]

Now kiss.

I would, but he has pibble cum on his breath.


EDIT: and he’s a spic or nigger with raging inadequacy and unrequited lust for a white girl. Disgusting.

Why am I friends with white people. I'm not good enough for them. I could never be good enough to be friends with a white person. She's so perfect.

Anyways

 

[Scream Tail]

Iirc some couple bred docile pitbulls and no one wanted them because they didn’t have blocky heads/the overly muscled “pitbull look” anymore and were just normal dogs. I watched a YouTube video on this but it was like 6 years ago.

How did they prove they were even docile? So many of these things are only like 50% pit and go 8+ years without mauling anyone before they suddenly do. They're always docile until they eat grandma.

 

[AnOminous]

To me, owning a pitbull is like owning a cheetah. I don't think cheetahs should all be tortured and killed, but if someone tells me "I'm a single cheetah mommy, did you know they're actually nanny cats? I always let my five year olds play with them" I'd be horrified.

They're wild animals. They shouldn't be kept as pets. But they are not inherently vicious creatures bred to kill. They are actually very shy and timid.

Shit bulls are evil.

This isn't even a joke. Cheetahs are so insecure that they often don't even survive into adulthood, and the main way of keeping them sane in captivity is to assign them a therapy dog.

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/cheetah-dog-furry-friendship

Nanaimo

Exactly what the fuck is wrong with this particular place in Canada? It's like half the time some utterly batfuck crazy shit goes down in Canada it's in this particular place.

 

[Two Frogs]

Calling any domesticated dog breed "a wolf" is also retarded. They're not wolves, we deliberately made them so fucked up genetically and mentally that they wouldn't be wolves any more. All dogs are literal retards:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11305043/

Researchers found that the extreme friendliness and social behavior of domestic dogs (hypersociability) is linked to deletions in specific genes on chromosome 6.

In humans, the deletion of these same genes on chromosome 7 causes Williams-Beuren Syndrome (WBS). People with WBS often exhibit:

• Extreme friendliness and an "everybody is a friend" personality.
• High levels of empathy and social interest.
• Distinctive facial features and potential cardiovascular issues.

 

[Getmeout]

pibble cum

How did they prove they were even docile?

I assumed that meant a good few of them lived full lives and died and didn't do anything/reacted to situations normally whereas the previous pitbulls would freak out.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

I assumed that meant a good few of them lived full lives and died and didn't do anything/reacted to situations normally whereas the previous pitbulls would freak out.

Survivorship bias. Lots of pitbulls are born, live a long life, and die without ever attacking anyone or even growling at anything. Which leads retards to assume “owner not bullshit” when it’s always been more like Russian Roulette.

 

[Brenda Holiday]

I wonder what the true rate of pibble aggression is considering every bite isn't necessarily reported.

 

[Eeey Valerie]

View attachment 8886306
From the description, the shooter was Rickety Cricket.
View attachment 8886308

They were both homeless. Imagine living out of a tent and your neighbor has pitbulls.

https://eu.dailycommercial.com/story/news/crime/2026/04/20/pasco-caught-and-other-details-emerge-about-recent-leesburg-shooting/89697375007/

Doesn't look good for the shooter. Also the New York Post title is incorrect as he did shoot the dogs too, one of them to death.

 

[Getmeout]

Survivorship bias. Lots of pitbulls are born, live a long life, and die without ever attacking anyone or even growling at anything. Which leads retards to assume “owner not bullshit” when it’s always been more like Russian Roulette.

That's sorta why I don't think a pitbull ban would be that bad, even if I disagree with it and disagree with the sentiment, unless someone finds a way to cut the pitbull in half and show every atom in it is docile, no one's gonna feel safe around one. And the world won't end if they just go, at absolute worst some people like me will slightly dislike dogs, and the world continues to spin.

 

[Coldgrip]

unless someone finds a way to cut the pitbull in half

Home depot can help with that.

 

[M€￦]

That's sorta why I don't think a pitbull ban would be that bad, even if I disagree with it and disagree with the sentiment, unless someone finds a way to cut the pitbull in half and show every atom in it is docile, no one's gonna feel safe around one. And the world won't end if they just go, at absolute worst some people like me will slightly dislike dogs, and the world continues to spin.

Only plausible way I can think of is to try to see what genetics causes aggression in dogs and (hopefully) test for that. Kind of like how they try to screen for health issues in other breeds. Otherwise it's a crapshoot as to what dog you'd get.

When it was said upthread that 95% of people should not own a pitbull, that I agree with, (although in my opinion it should be more like 98%.) Unfortunately though this runs up against the backyard breeders, shelters, and more whose whole business depends on the 95% of people thinking pitbulls are just like any other dog and that they can handle them. Otherwise, would anyone want one for realsies? I think not.

You also have the massive issue of too many pitbull owners not neutering their dogs and letting them make tons of puppies. Even if you were to breed in true docility and non-reactiveness in a population, you still have the problem of all the idiots letting their pits breed too, and thus always ensuring any truly docile dog remains the minority.

You would have to change people's minds and show them things they don't want to see. I wouldn't start off as saying 'Pitbulls are dangerous' because you have a whole lot of people currently invested in 'Not my pibble' and they'd get defensive. Instead, show pictures of all the pitbulls sitting in shelters and on euthanasia lists and show that this is what often happens to their dog's puppies that were conceived just to make a quick buck.

Most people don't want to think of the bodies in black trash bags that are sitting in the freezer waiting for disposal. If you've ever seen 'It's Me or the Dog' with the British dog trainer lady, there is one episode of this guy that wants to breed his pitbull, and she tries to talk him out of it by taking him to the shelter to see all of the dogs, 95% which are pitbulls. Then she shows him the freezer out back full of euthanized animals in black trashbags, and what will likely happen to the pit puppies when they get older. Most people don't think of this when they breed their dogs, they are just thinking of the money they'll make and not what happens to the dogs.

 

[Getmeout]

You also have the massive issue of too many pitbull owners not neutering their dogs and letting them make tons of puppies. Even if you were to breed in true docility and non-reactiveness in a population, you still have the problem of all the idiots letting their pits breed too, and thus always ensuring any truly docile dog remains the minority.

You would have to change people's minds and show them things they don't want to see. I wouldn't start off as saying 'Pitbulls are dangerous' because you have a whole lot of people currently invested in 'Not my pibble' and they'd get defensive. Instead, show pictures of all the pitbulls sitting in shelters and on euthanasia lists and show that this is what often happens to their dog's puppies that were conceived just to make a quick buck.

Most people don't want to think of the bodies in black trash bags that are sitting in the freezer waiting for disposal. If you've ever seen 'It's Me or the Dog' with the British dog trainer lady, there is one episode of this guy that wants to breed his pitbull, and she tries to talk him out of it by taking him to the shelter to see all of the dogs, 95% which are pitbulls. Then she shows him the freezer out back full of euthanized animals in black trashbags, and what will likely happen to the pit puppies when they get older. Most people don't think of this when they breed their dogs, they are just thinking of the money they'll make and not what happens to the dogs.

Yup, this is what made me pro neutering pitbulls. I saw just how many of them live their whole lives stagnant in a shelter and then just get killed off cause no one wants them, it's so unnecessary, this could be prevented if you just like made less of them. If the issue was just danger, I could at least understand "Well, they'd make great guard dogs" but the amount of pitbull puppies being made are not anywhere close to the amount of people who want a guard dog.

Also I think I agree with that 98% thing, I'm biased cause like I said, a close friend of mine owns a pitbull. But now that I sit down and think of it, she's the only one I actually trust with one. I can't really think of anyone else I know who I wouldn't be concerned if they owned a pitbull. Wheter because I'd be scared it'd snap, or they themself wouldn't know how to take care of it and it'd suffer.

 

[Helvítis Túristi]

Only plausible way I can think of is to try to see what genetics causes aggression in dogs and (hopefully) test for that. Kind of like how they try to screen for health issues in other breeds. Otherwise it's a crapshoot as to what dog you'd get.

The genes are probably linked, meaning breeding out the aggression and other stereotypical pitbull behaviors would breed out the physical characteristics of a pitbull. So you would just be making something that is not a pitbulll.

 

[AnOminous]

If the issue was just danger, I could at least understand "Well, they'd make great guard dogs" but the amount of pitbull puppies being made are not anywhere close to the amount of people who want a guard dog.

That's the problem with shit bulls. They're just as likely to kill your kids as to protect them.

This is why you have something like a German Shepherd as a guard dog, an intelligent animal that actually understands shit, and not a mental retard violent psycho dog like a shit bull.

 

[Getmeout]

That's the problem with shit bulls. They're just as likely to kill your kids as to protect them.

This is why you have something like a German Shepherd as a guard dog, an intelligent animal that actually understands shit, and not a mental retard violent psycho dog like a shit bull.

I just think the culture of keeping animals around kids is weird period tbh.

 

[AnOminous]

I just think the culture of keeping animals around kids is weird period tbh.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with most pets.

The vast majority of dogs are of nearly zero risk and are protective and friendly.

The genes are probably linked, meaning breeding out the aggression and other stereotypical pitbull behaviors would breed out the physical characteristics of a pitbull. So you would just be making something that is not a pitbulll.

I'm not seeing the minus here.

 

[Getmeout]

There's absolutely nothing wrong with most pets.

The vast majority of dogs are of nearly zero risk and are protective and friendly.

It's not that I feel like all dogs will maul a child, dogs are about as smart as 3 yr olds. I wouldn't trust most kids with 3 yr olds, I also wouldn't trust most 3 yr olds with kids.

 

[AnOminous]

It's not that I feel like all dogs will maul a child, dogs are about as smart as 3 yr olds. I wouldn't trust most kids with 3 yr olds, I also wouldn't trust most 3 yr olds with kids.

You really think kids should grow up without pets?

 

[Getmeout]

You really think kids should grow up without pets?

I don't think anyone "should" do anything, "should" implies it's required. I don't think a kid needs a pet (As in, they won't die or turn out horribly messed up without one), and most of the time when someone gives their kid a pet, I think there's something wrong with it. Not inherently the act of giving a kid a pet, but some other factor in their situation.
By "pet" I mean something like a dog or a cat or a hamster, can't remember the last time I didn't like a kid having a fish or a caterpillar.

 

[SITHRAK!]

try to see what genetics causes aggression in dogs and (hopefully) test for that

This puts things in danger territory, because implying aggression/violence in pibbles has a genetic basis may imply that certain other mammalian species may have similar issues. And we can’t have that!

Matter of fact, the idea of any creature being hardwired for violence instead of environment-reactive goes against modern ‘politically correct’ scientific ideology. There’s a reason there’s a replicability crisis in human heath sciences. Despite it being blatantly obvious that that many heritable traits are genetic (genetic disorders, skin, eye and hair color, height, fast-twitch muscle fiber ratios, heart disease factors etc) it’s akin to heresy to suggest that aggression, intelligence, propensity to mental illness etc may also be genetic.

The main angle of pibble defense is usually that their violence is circumstantial. If we were to isolate genes that cause pibble violence and CRISPR them out of existence, who’s to say that certain human populations aren’t next?