The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame - Reading warning labels are for chumps.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
retarded gender war sperging
6.PNG
>maximum amount of posts on a search page
lolz go back.
There's two ways of reading this.

One of these two problems can be fixed with boiled eggs and slightly more walking, while the other can only be fixed by a bullet. Do you have some kind of intense workout regimen, or like, underlying health condition which promotes that resentment towards people who neglect their own health?
I wasn't calling for violence. I do despise obeasts as much as I despise fags though, if that's what you're asking.
 
Confirmation bias definitely plays a role when it comes to hating gays, especially on websites devoted to documenting and discussing freaks in society. If you read thread writeups on 100 separate gay dudes who are disgusting deviant pedophiles in a row then it's obviously going to look like they're all that way, when that sample size is like 1% of 1%. But people will swear up and down they have perfect gaydar and gays are all degenerate creeps and so on.

So, what are all the other gays going to do? Raise their hand and declare "well, I'm gay and I'm not like that?" That's retarded pick-me behavior (Gays Against Groomers shows how ineffectual it is anyways), and it's already incentivized in that context for them to simply evade your radar instead because you are not going to be swayed. Full stop.

There's some nuance to be employed here. Being gay in and of itself won't make some a freak, but it sure as shit opens up a lot of pipelines for them to end up that way. Sex positivity, queer ideology, the trans bullshit; people use it as a vector for "acceptance" and "tolerance" which never has brakes or respect for opposing ideologies and viewpoints.
 
Confirmation bias definitely plays a role when it comes to hating gays, especially on websites devoted to documenting and discussing freaks in society. If you read thread writeups on 100 separate gay dudes who are disgusting deviant pedophiles in a row then it's obviously going to look like they're all that way, when that sample size is like 1% of 1%. But people will swear up and down they have perfect gaydar and gays are all degenerate creeps and so on.

So, what are all the other gays going to do? Raise their hand and declare "well, I'm gay and I'm not like that?" That's retarded pick-me behavior (Gays Against Groomers shows how ineffectual it is anyways), and it's already incentivized in that context for them to simply evade your radar instead because you are not going to be swayed. Full stop.

There's some nuance to be employed here. Being gay in and of itself won't make some a freak, but it sure as shit opens up a lot of pipelines for them to end up that way. Sex positivity, queer ideology, the trans bullshit; people use it as a vector for "acceptance" and "tolerance" which never has brakes or respect for opposing ideologies and viewpoints.
My perspective is that a man wanting to fuck other men is a paraphilia and paraphilias come in clusters. Sometimes those other paraphilias will be ultimately harmless shit but it can also be evil shit like zoo/pedo stuff. That explains why gays have a disproportionate amount of those types compared to straights.
 
Last edited:
My perspective is that a man wanting to fuck other men is a paraphilia and paraphilias come in clusters. Sometimes those other paraphilias will be ultimately harmless shit but it can also be evil shit like zoo/pedo stuff. That explains why gays have a disproportionate amount of those types compared to straights.
There is not a single mention of homosexuals being recognized as a paraphilia in the DSM-5
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM-5-Paraphilic-Disorders.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjBzfLipK6HAxV0SfEDHSIhC5UQFnoECCoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3PAuSsF0F-itR5eVa0gBgH
This list was made by people smarter than us both.

The only mention I know from research is Sigmund Freud mentioning that if a developmental goal is not met or even when it is met during the phallic phase of development you will develop homosexuality as a variant, not as a paraphilia.
Screenshot_20240717_163049_Chrome.jpg
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud%27s_views_on_homosexuality&ved=2ahUKEwj826n1pK6HAxX1SvEDHb_wANIQFnoECBgQBQ&usg=AOvVaw2jJkgtsbgqfdLe-cb2JwAw
What are your credentials to blatantly label homosexuals as inherently deviant? If you don't show me credentials I will not take your reply seriously in the slightest. @Harm has explained how these deviant tendencies come from the queer ideology movement.

Please cite your sources too, I will not take you at your word.

Also I am not a homosexual so my criticism of your comment is only bias in the sense that I like the user @Harm as a person.
 
There is not a single mention of homosexuals being recognized as a paraphilia in the DSM-5
Didn't the DSM-5 suffer from a large amount of changes when it came to sexual/gender-related disorders? I know that the definition of gender dysphoria/euphoria was changed to be more akin to the current attitudes towards troons, I would not be surprised if a similar process also happened regarding homosexual behavior
 
Didn't the DSM-5 suffer from a large amount of changes when it came to sexual/gender-related disorders? I know that the definition of gender dysphoria/euphoria was changed to be more akin to the current attitudes towards troons, I would not be surprised if a similar process also happened regarding homosexual behavior
yes, it did. There's even a entry mentioning vore as a paraphilia (get fucked pyrocinical) . No homosexuals are listed pre or before the revision. Transexuals were added.
Screenshot 2024-07-17 170928.png
Screenshot 2024-07-17 170945.png
source
 
It seems like there's a horshoe theory where if you simp for women too much AKA be a male feminist like Vaush, then you're a pedo. But on contrary, if you hate women too much and be a typical incel or manosphere guy then you're a pedo too
It’s the difference between being anorexic vs being bedridden and morbidly obese, while both are horrible one is objectively easier to fix than the other
 
Interesting. Maybe I will look into the earlier versions (DSM-I through III) to see if they ever had homsexuality in there, and what changes the opinion suffered across the decades
according to wikipedo, the dsm-1 lists it as a sociopathic personality disturbance.

for the DSM-II this is wholesale stolen from wikipedo: As described by Ronald Bayer, a psychiatrist and gay rights activist, specific protests by gay rights activists against the APA began in 1970, when the organization held its convention in San Francisco. The activists disrupted the conference by interrupting speakers and shouting down and ridiculing psychiatrists who viewed homosexuality as a mental disorder. In 1971, gay rights activist Frank Kameny worked with the Gay Liberation Front collective to demonstrate at the APA's convention. At the 1971 conference, Kameny grabbed the microphone and yelled: "Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate. Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you."

sounds familiar. very, very familiar.

they removed homosexuality from the DSM-II in or after the 7th revision and only appeared in a certain form from there on out, being changed to have Ego-dystonic homosexuality be classified as a sexual orientation disturbance in the DSM-III, followed up by removing even that from the DSM-III-R.

The DSM-4 is where they finally got rid of it as an explicit thing in the book.

interestingly, the WHO still used the concept of Ego-dystonic homosexuality until 2019.
 
according to wikipedo, the dsm-1 lists it as a sociopathic personality disturbance.

for the DSM-II this is wholesale stolen from wikipedo: As described by Ronald Bayer, a psychiatrist and gay rights activist, specific protests by gay rights activists against the APA began in 1970, when the organization held its convention in San Francisco. The activists disrupted the conference by interrupting speakers and shouting down and ridiculing psychiatrists who viewed homosexuality as a mental disorder. In 1971, gay rights activist Frank Kameny worked with the Gay Liberation Front collective to demonstrate at the APA's convention. At the 1971 conference, Kameny grabbed the microphone and yelled: "Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate. Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you."

sounds familiar. very, very familiar.

they removed homosexuality from the DSM-II in or after the 7th revision and only appeared in a certain form from there on out, being changed to have Ego-dystonic homosexuality be classified as a sexual orientation disturbance in the DSM-III, followed up by removing even that from the DSM-III-R.

The DSM-4 is where they finally got rid of it as an explicit thing in the book.

interestingly, the WHO still used the concept of Ego-dystonic homosexuality until 2019.
As expected. Those tactics that we see now from the 21st century alphabets didn't start with them, and there was never a clear distinction between the two since even as far back as the Stonewall days, troons and crossderssers were part of that movement. We actually were lucky that NAMBLA didn't make the same gains as those two, or, if those protests aganist the recent Cali law punishing pedophilia more severely are anything to go by, hasn't fully realized their vision
 
according to wikipedo, the dsm-1 lists it as a sociopathic personality disturbance.
yes, it did. There's even a entry mentioning vore as a paraphilia (get fucked pyrocinical) . No homosexuals are listed pre or before the revision. Transexuals were added.
I was wrong. My apologies for the missinformation in the quote above.
 
One of my greatest fears is having my dox posted to this thread.
follow the advice of sexy senior citizen below.

It's not just that. He was flinging shit like a retarded monkey and eventually angered an autist who went and dug up his retarded past. He clearly never heard of the phrase, "don't start nothing, won't be nothing." I don't think anyone would've found his accounts if he'd been playing nice with the other kids; nobody would've cared enough. He's sown the wind, and now he's reaping the storm.

If you have any, ANY doubts about your opsec, and don't want to leave the Farms, don't start retarded slapfights.
and if you followed the advice given to you at sign up, to not use an email connected to other things, or a username found in other places (and by extension an avatar and custom quote) then it shouldn't be relevant to you. your activities on kiwifarms ideally ought to be entirely separated from your other behaviors, because that's kind of the point, now.
 
Back