The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame - Reading warning labels are for chumps.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
There's some nuance to be employed here.
This is Kiwi Farms. We deal with the extremes of human deviancy. When you're constantly exposed to it, sooner or later that's all you come to expect from people. Extremes become normal.

What I'm saying is everyone should touch grass once a day, if only to keep in touch with reality.
 
I haven't seen breach data for @Higgs Bonbon posted yet so here you go.
View attachment 6200296
It reveals the e-mail address pedonymous@gmail.com and albinochao@hotmail.com + his DOB of 19th of May 1993
View attachment 6200308
There is a DeviantArt account under the name albinochao but nothing there https://www.deviantart.com/albinochao/about
View attachment 6200315
There was nothing beyond that Neopets breach when searching for albinochao by username.
What does "salt" mean?
 
What does "salt" mean?
A function which computes cryptographic hash checksum digests is deterministic. Given the same input, it always produces the same output. This is undesirable for passwords, since identical passwords across different services would have identical digests. To defeat this, the salt is added, which is a bit of random data hidden from view that adds non-determinism to the process.

I should also add a note on the rainbow table approach. It's possible, and not very hard, to take common passwords and compute their digests ahead of time. Then, after a breach, the digests can simply be looked up in the table to save time. Use of salts also defeats this approach.
 
A function which computes cryptographic hash checksum digests is deterministic. Given the same input, it always produces the same output. This is undesirable for passwords, since identical passwords across different services would have identical digests. To defeat this, the salt is added, which is a bit of random data hidden from view that adds non-determinism to the process.

I should also add a note on the rainbow table approach. It's possible, and not very hard, to take common passwords and compute their digests ahead of time. Then, after a breach, the digests can simply be looked up in the table to save time. Use of salts also defeats this approach.
I don't understand a single word, to be honest
 
Deviating from normal is very literally deviant. Do you not understand words?
Been diving into this topic further and a recent study supports what you said. Looks like I've been reading too many biased articles engaging in advocacy science and let emotions dictate my stance. I honest to god did view homosexuality as normal due to it's sheer prevalence in modern pop culture.
Screenshot 2024-07-17 221456.png
Screenshot 2024-07-17 221913.png
source

This is from an article touching on a scientist criticizing another scientist.
tl;dr
Basically the scientist being criticized uses "adjustment" as a measure for being normal, while the scientist who wrote the article criticizes the use of generalized language to push a agenda. The scientist writing this uses the fetish of cutting off your own limbs and masochism as an example of a disorder passing off as normal due to the individual with the paraphilia appearing well adjusted in society (according to the logic of the criticized scientist). Thus the normalcy of homosexuality can't be dictated solely by appearing adjusted.
The only mention I know from research is Sigmund Freud mentioning that if a developmental goal is not met or even when it is met during the phallic phase of development you will develop homosexuality as a variant, not as a paraphilia.
More on this. Sigmunds work was censored in some schools in America. But he originally wrote that homosexuality is the result of arrested development during the phalic phase. But maintains the stance it's the other side of the coin of homosexuality, which is highly criticized.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand a single word, to be honest
Here, read this.
This standard specifies hash algorithms that can be used to generate digests of messages.
The digests are used to detect whether messages have been changed since the digests were generated.
The hash algorithms specified in this Standard are called secure because, for a given algorithm, it is computationally infeasible 1) to find a message that corresponds to a given message digest, or 2) to find two different messages that produce the same message digest. Any change to a message will, with a very high probability, result in a different message digest. This will result in a verification failure when the secure hash algorithm is used with a digital signature algorithm or a keyed-hash message authentication algorithm.
All of the algorithms are iterative, one-way hash functions that can process a message to produce a condensed representation called a message digest. These algorithms enable the determination of a message’s integrity: any change to the message will, with a very high probability, result in a different message digest. This property is useful in the generation and verification of digital signatures and message authentication codes, and in the generation of random numbers or bits.
 

Attachments

There's some nuance to be employed here. Being gay in and of itself won't make some a freak, but it sure as shit opens up a lot of pipelines for them to end up that way
I've known and talked to fags IRL when i was less militantly anti-gay. They're all fucking freaks. There are supposedly some out there who behave like heteros apart from fucking men but to me that's a myth. Gays love to talk about their proclivities because if there's anything a faggot loves as much as man ass it is attention.
At 10 years old my father told me and my cousins, with his rather poor grasp on the language and very matter-of-factly, "If my son was gay i'd beat him destroyed" and even back then i thought man has a point. Fuck faggots. I show no love for homo thugs.
 
I don't understand a single word, to be honest
I sort of get it.
Sounds like it literally figuratively adds a little bit of extra spice to the stored password to make it more difficult to decrypt.

People typically won’t post your dox unless you’re doing heinous shit.
Or being a hateable prick.
 
Last edited:
Back