EU The End of the West - Donald Trump's return to the White House shows that liberal democracy has failed. It proved unable to provide a coherent structure to the post postwar era.

A DER SPIEGEL Editorial by Dirk Kurbjuweit
10.11.2024, 11.41 Uhr

1731390753904.png
The return of Donald Trump to the White House marks the end of an era. Foto: Brian Snyder / REUTERS

One era is coming to an end and a new one is beginning. Nothing marks this shift as clearly as the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president of the United States. The West has lost its dominance and the shared foundation of values, which has been crumbling for some time, is now collapsing. There are tensions everywhere – between countries and within societies. The right wing is on the rise in Italy, France and Germany. The West as a block of liberal democracies no longer exists.

The Western world blossomed after 1945, a reaction to a pair of totalitarian systems: National Socialism and Stalinism. Hitler’s Reich served as a reminder that such a catastrophe must not be repeated. And the Soviet empire behind the Iron Curtain, while also seen as a threat, emboldened Western countries to invest in a shining counter-model: social and liberal democracy.

Prosperity for All​

The system’s strength was its concern for people, for the individual. Prosperity for all through social equality, more rights for women and homosexuals, the absence of authoritarian impositions by the state: All of this made the West attractive in the decades that followed World War II. Those who lived in the West enjoyed their freedoms and their high standard of living. A broad center developed, the pillar of liberal democracy.

The age of totalitarian ideologies, which were essentially political religions, was followed by a phase of rationality, of scientifically based reason. Politics was pursued with the utmost solemnity, because so much was at stake: preventing the return of fascism and standing up to the Soviet Union.

Liberal democrats also underestimated just how important the concept of nation continues to be.

Western countries joined forces in NATO. Individual countries were less important than the alliance as a whole. National borders became permeable, disappearing completely in some cases. Internationalization, the European Union, citizen of the world: It was, despite a few shortcomings, a good era. Unfortunately, it is now over.

How could that which began so promisingly now end with Donald Trump, a man who disrupts the system and whose policies are rooted in lunacy?

The initial steps forward in liberal democracies were social advances. But at some point, the social questions were considered to have been largely resolved and the era of social democracy came to an end. The majority of society, after all, was doing well. Progressive politics shifted to fresh challenges: doing away with patriarchy and establishing new freedoms for minorities – important projects to be sure.

But this shift was not managed well. Center-left politicians in particular – the Democrats in the U.S. and the Greens in Germany, for example – paid too little attention to the fact that the issue of equity, that concerns of social decline, don’t simply vanish when the general level of prosperity is high. The resulting impression was that center-left parties did too little for workers, for the center of society. The high cost of living is now seen as one of the most important reasons for Trump’s victory.

Beyond that, governments were unable to establish the fight against climate change early on as a sensible, self-evident project. Hesitation, equivocation and dawdling continued for so long that the challenge grew too large, to the point that many people began fearing for the lives they had grown used to. Trump was able to profit from that as well, by denying the facts.

Liberal democrats also underestimated just how important the concept of nation continues to be. When the Soviet Union disappeared, the West lost its most important source of cohesion. Without the pressure to stay together, many began focusing more intently on their own interests. No longer was the protection of the West in its entirety the focus, but one’s own country. Immigrants were increasingly seen as a threat. This shift, too, was given too little attention by liberal democracies. An advantage for Trump.

A Lack of Earnestness​

The fear of war and authoritarian rule initially made it easy for those in government to hold societies in Western countries together. When this bond dissolved, liberal democrats failed to provide a coherent structure to the post postwar era. Some simply lacked the requisite earnestness, as exemplified by the embarrassing disintegration of Germany’s governing coalition in these difficult times. They lost a large part of society, to the point that many voters feel better represented by authoritarian voices. What a tragedy.

The resuscitation of the West can only be successful if we finally understand that almost all issues are also social issues, whether it be economic policy, migration policy or climate policy. Rational politics remains the correct course of action. But it absolutely must have a heart.

Source (Archive)
 
Liberal democrats also underestimated just how important the concept of nation continues to be. When the Soviet Union disappeared, the West lost its most important source of cohesion. Without the pressure to stay together, many began focusing more intently on their own interests.
We mindfucked the Germans too hard. They are now unable to understand the concept of nationalism.
 
standing up to the Soviet Union.

Liberal democrats also underestimated just how important the concept of nation continues to be.

Western countries joined forces in NATO. Individual countries were less important than the alliance as a whole. National borders became permeable, disappearing completely in some cases. Internationalization, the European Union, citizen of the world: It was, despite a few shortcomings, a good era.

...the same mindset of the person who wrote this article is the same as that of the Useful Idiots who screeched that hardline US presidents who stood up to the USSR were going to get us all killed in a nuclear war, that the USSR were the good guys. They took their marching orders from double-blind organizations funded by the KGB and GRU. They were pinkos every one of them. But now because Russia Bad, parlor pinkos like this one want to hitch their wagon to the US basically winning the cold war.

My fuckin' sides.
 
So on top of going beyond-qanon levels of crazy with project 2025 and sperging about the election being stolen the shitlibs are now doing 'the west has fallen meme' too?
1731393808810.png
"Billions must dilate"
governments were unable to establish the fight against climate change early on as a sensible, self-evident project. Hesitation, equivocation and dawdling continued for so long
My ass, they didn't do shit because they're corrupt and didn't want their paymasters to lose money.
 
Last edited:
Liberal democrats also underestimated just how important the concept of nation continues to be. When the Soviet Union disappeared, the West lost its most important source of cohesion. Without the pressure to stay together, many began focusing more intently on their own interests. No longer was the protection of the West in its entirety the focus, but one’s own country. Immigrants were increasingly seen as a threat. This shift, too, was given too little attention by liberal democracies. An advantage for Trump.
Because you fucks eradicated the concept of a nation in favor of an economic zone full of "immigrants" and "refugees." In the process you destroyed centuries of culture and turned our countries into crime-filled atomized hellholes of "diversity".
The initial steps forward in liberal democracies were social advances. But at some point, the social questions were considered to have been largely resolved and the era of social democracy came to an end. The majority of society, after all, was doing well. Progressive politics shifted to fresh challenges: doing away with patriarchy and establishing new freedoms for minorities – important projects to be sure.
You had to make up new "rights" like "right to groom children into cutting their dick off" and "right not to be laughed at for being a freakish crossdressing public fetishist loser." That's why nobody wants that bullshit because it can only exist when the elite make it their program
Beyond that, governments were unable to establish the fight against climate change early on as a sensible, self-evident project. Hesitation, equivocation and dawdling continued for so long that the challenge grew too large, to the point that many people began fearing for the lives they had grown used to. Trump was able to profit from that as well, by denying the facts.
I can't imagine why anyone would want bans on gas stoves and beef, taxes out the ass, and being forced to drive electric cars or not at all just so in 10-20-50 years or whatever we'll have a few more hurricanes per year hit India or whatever. You lost the game on climate change the minute you said nuclear power was still bad and we needed to live like third world peasants and eat bugs to save the planet whilst dropping billions on the troon agenda and wars in the Middle East and Ukraine and all that bullshit.

The West is dead because your liberal world order fantasies of the End of History killed it. To see your fantasies die alongside it is a sweet pleasure, and my most sincere wish is that they lay buried in the same plot of history as Hitler's empire, global communism, and all the other dreams of yesterday.
 
So on top of going beyond-qanon level of crazy with project 2025, sperging about the elections being stolen the shitlibs are now doing 'the west has fallen meme' too?
View attachment 6637318
"Billions must dilate"

My ass, they didn't do shit because they're corrupt and didn't want their paymasters to lose money.

At the end of the horseshoe waits the eternal chud.
 
The fear of war and authoritarian rule initially made it easy for those in government to hold societies in Western countries together.
But the fear of war and authoritarian rule is why the government fell apart. Your government is coming perilously close to war with Russia by arming and sending "volunteers" and "trainers" to the Ukraine.
 
But the fear of war and authoritarian rule is why the government fell apart.
This happens every 10 to 20 years. It happened in the 60, 70, 80s, 2005 and now 2024. It's nothing new.

Your government is coming perilously close to war with Russia
And? Russia needs to get bombed to the ground. It's only a matter of time until NATO slays these pests.
 
The resuscitation of the West can only be successful if we finally understand that almost all issues are also social issues, whether it be economic policy, migration policy or climate policy. Rational politics remains the correct course of action. But it absolutely must have a heart.

What the fuck does that even mean? "We need to undrstand the issues and make better policies, and the policies mush have a heart." ?

Thats the most useless word porridge ever. No wonder the right is on the rise, with mega retards like this as opponents.
 
The system’s strength was its concern for people, for the individual. Prosperity for all through social equality, more rights for women and homosexuals
"Some people are more equal than others".
The majority of society, after all, was doing well. Progressive politics shifted to fresh challenges: doing away with patriarchy and establishing new freedoms for minorities – important projects to be sure.
That's a fun term for actively discriminating the majority that actually pays taxes.
 
Back