The First Swedes - 'We wuz vikangz'

As I said, we have genetic material from Scandinavian hunter-gatherers. We also have genetic material from other European hunter-gatherers. While some of them gained adaptions for lighter skin, others didn't.

I'd consider Amerindian populations actually a good proxy for non-light skin adapted Europeans.
I suppose that is what we should expect. White skin as we know it today confers some selective advantage in northerly climates but not having it isn't a death sentence and the degree of demelanization in Caucasians is the result of multiple mutations. It would take time for it to become the norm.

But they probably weren't Africans, as you say.
 
Is this a way for white EssJays to feel better about themselves and claim they’re really not white?
>dark skinned and blue eyed
>prompted fear and denial

:story:
So its the opposite of the "whites of /int/" meme?
minoriteam.jpg
 
Last edited:
I wonder if there would be as much outrage if the character were to be portrayed by a Sicilian instead.
I think there would be a few people(the type that thinks skin color that isn't snow white=Black) but i don't think it would be as jarring because most people will just think they are tan because they spent a lot of time outdoors.Then again people just want any reason to be mad.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Your Weird Fetish
Oh, it's not the first time SVT are pulling this stunt :P But no, the first Swedes weren't kangz n shiet hailing from deepest Somalia just because they might have had darker skin. It's a bit ridiculous how left-wing activists on SVpol Twitter are using migration waves that took place thousands of years ago when the nation state Sweden didn't exist as proof of how we have always been a multicultural nation of immigrants or whatever.

Also Peter Imanuelsen needs to stop pretending he's Swedish when he's just a cocaine snorting LARPer with an obvious Norwegian accent
 
  • Informative
Reactions: frozenrunner
I think the more disturbing part about this is that the recent archaelogical and genetic discoveries have been memory holed.

I referenced how the blue eyed trait had been traced back to the black sea. How, you may ask? And the answer is simple. Mitochondria.

The Mitochondria is the power source of every cell in the human body. There is an issue though. Its not human. Yes. You heard that correctly. The Mitochondria is a symbiotic. An independent organism that works in harmony with a host (as opposed to a parasitic relationship). Sometime in very, very ancient history, a bacterium merged with animal cells and decided it would just hang out indefinitely. And unlike the cells in your body Mitochondria have their own separate and independent DNA. More importantly, their DNA is not subject to mixing in sexual reproduction. It reproduces asexually down the female genetic line exclusively. Which means children will have the exact same mitochondria as their mothers. And I mean that literally. They are identical in every way.

This is how scientists are able to show that blue eyes came from the black sea. All they need is the mitochondrial DNA of someone with blue eyes. Any human alive right now, who has blue eyes, has the exact same mitochondrial DNA of the first woman who had blue eyes. Not somewhat identical either. Completely identical. A literal Asexual clone. This also means that the out of Africa theory is completely fucking wrong, because the mitochondrial DNA indicates multiple origin points for the homind species that would become Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Anyone with black skin obviously, emerged from Africa and we can trace the mitochondrial lineage to Homo Erectus. White people, the blue eyed blond/red haired, are traced to the black sea and Homo Neanderthalis, and the people of east asia from Homo Ergaster. Three separate origin points.

The species were clearly close enough that there was obvious cross interaction. And modern humans are the dominant evolutionary strain. But all the recent genetic evidence indicates there were three separate origin points among three separate hominid species and at some point Homo Sapiens emerged and killed the competition. How this happened is a mystery. What is not a mystery however is that the mitochondrial DNA diverges very strongly among different population groups. Meaning there is NOT a common ancestory for Homo Sapiens. i.e, there is no Mitochondrial Eve. There is no one woman who is the mother of all. We are the product of at a minimum, THREE Eves, and potentially more.
 
Last edited:
I think the more disturbing part about this is that the recent archaelogical and genetic discoveries have been memory holed.

I referenced how the blue eyed trait had been traced back to the black sea. How, you may ask? And the answer is simple. Mitochondria.

The Mitochondria is the power source of every cell in the human body. There is an issue though. Its not human. Yes. You heard that correctly. The Mitochondria is a symbiotic. An independent organism that works in harmony with a host (as opposed to a parasitic relationship). Sometime in very, very ancient history, a bacterium merged with animal cells and decided it would just hang out indefinitely. And unlike the cells in your body Mitochondria have their own separate and independent DNA. More importantly, their DNA is not subject to mixing in sexual reproduction. It reproduces asexually down the female genetic line exclusively. Which means children will have the exact same mitochondria as their mothers. And I mean that literally. They are identical in every way.

This is how scientists are able to show that blue eyes came from the black sea. All they need is the mitochondrial DNA of someone with blue eyes. Any human alive right now, who has blue eyes, has the exact same mitochondrial DNA of the first woman who had blue eyes. Not somewhat identical either. Completely identical. A literal Asexual clone. This also means that the out of Africa theory is completely fucking wrong, because the mitochondrial DNA indicates multiple origin points for the homind species that would become Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Anyone with black skin obviously, emerged from Africa and we can trace the mitochondrial lineage to Homo Erectus. White people, the blue eyed blond/red haired, are traced to the black sea and Homo Neanderthalis, and the people of east asia from Homo Ergaster. Three separate origin points.

The species were clearly close enough that there was obvious cross interaction. And modern humans are the dominant evolutionary strain. But all the recent genetic evidence indicates there were three separate origin points among three separate hominid species and at some point Homo Sapiens emerged and killed the competition. How this happened is a mystery. What is not a mystery however is that the mitochondrial DNA diverges very strongly among different population groups. Meaning there is NOT a common ancestory for Homo Sapiens. i.e, there is no Mitochondrial Eve. There is no one woman who is the mother of all. We are the product of at a minimum, THREE Eves, and potentially more.

tl;dr we didn't come out of Africa except for the people who raped and murdered all the other Homos.

Nice try Cletus, your great-great-x100-grandpappy is still a nigger.
 
Here's a crazy idea for black people who want to proudly show off their history:

Create history to actually be proud of. Or start research on your own history and look for things to be proud of.
If you can't do either of these two things, don't go about pillaging the history of other nations to adorn yourself with laurels you don't have a claim to.
 
I think the more disturbing part about this is that the recent archaelogical and genetic discoveries have been memory holed.

I referenced how the blue eyed trait had been traced back to the black sea. How, you may ask? And the answer is simple. Mitochondria.

The Mitochondria is the power source of every cell in the human body. There is an issue though. Its not human. Yes. You heard that correctly. The Mitochondria is a symbiotic. An independent organism that works in harmony with a host (as opposed to a parasitic relationship). Sometime in very, very ancient history, a bacterium merged with animal cells and decided it would just hang out indefinitely. And unlike the cells in your body Mitochondria have their own separate and independent DNA. More importantly, their DNA is not subject to mixing in sexual reproduction. It reproduces asexually down the female genetic line exclusively. Which means children will have the exact same mitochondria as their mothers. And I mean that literally. They are identical in every way.

This is how scientists are able to show that blue eyes came from the black sea. All they need is the mitochondrial DNA of someone with blue eyes. Any human alive right now, who has blue eyes, has the exact same mitochondrial DNA of the first woman who had blue eyes. Not somewhat identical either. Completely identical. A literal Asexual clone. This also means that the out of Africa theory is completely fucking wrong, because the mitochondrial DNA indicates multiple origin points for the homind species that would become Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Anyone with black skin obviously, emerged from Africa and we can trace the mitochondrial lineage to Homo Erectus. White people, the blue eyed blond/red haired, are traced to the black sea and Homo Neanderthalis, and the people of east asia from Homo Ergaster. Three separate origin points.

The species were clearly close enough that there was obvious cross interaction. And modern humans are the dominant evolutionary strain. But all the recent genetic evidence indicates there were three separate origin points among three separate hominid species and at some point Homo Sapiens emerged and killed the competition. How this happened is a mystery. What is not a mystery however is that the mitochondrial DNA diverges very strongly among different population groups. Meaning there is NOT a common ancestory for Homo Sapiens. i.e, there is no Mitochondrial Eve. There is no one woman who is the mother of all. We are the product of at a minimum, THREE Eves, and potentially more.
And one of the Eves is named Lilith.
 
Good money is that the tribes in the area saw blue eyes as some sort of divine favor

7.7k years ago (which is the bare minimum of when it happened) they would've been lucky to have 'tribes' or the concept of 'divine favor' at all. Much more likely it was just the leader of a small band of hunters in a population bottleneck that later spread out across the area.

Anyone with black skin obviously, emerged from Africa and we can trace the mitochondrial lineage to Homo Erectus.

If anyone with black skin emerged from africa, why are australian aboriginals so different genetically from subsaharan africans?

White people, the blue eyed blond/red haired, are traced to the black sea and Homo Neanderthalis
I hope you aren't implying ala Varg Vikernes that white people inherit red and blond hair from Neanderthals, who had a completely unrelated gene for reddish hair. Also, Neanderthal DNA is only present in modern europeans at like 8% maximum, hardly what you'd call a single ancestor. And as far as it being the source of whiteness, Neanderthal DNA is also present in asians, though less pronounced, at around 2%. I'd also like to point out that, Neanderthals had the type of face that would be mocked on /pol/ if they lived today:
Neand.jpg
Hardly an Aryan beauty.
and the people of east asia from Homo Ergaster.
Dude, wut. Homo Ergaster went extinct 500,000 years ago, and looked like this:
1550660449_MNP_-_Turkanajunge_2.jpg
I have no idea how you can compare the very very recent extinction of Homo Neandertalensis (40k) with the ultra ancient disappearance of Homo Ergaster. And how on earth would H. Ergaster contribute EXCLUSIVELY to asians, since it was geographically a pan-eurasian species?
Meaning there is NOT a common ancestory for Homo Sapiens. i.e, there is no Mitochondrial Eve.
That's a bold claim on a complicated subject. I'm not an authority, so I can't make a statement of that type, but what I will say is that despite genetic clustering, there is still a significant amount of overlap between the three racial groups genetically. More to the point, I think the existance of a mitochondrial eve isn't really relevant to the discussion of whether ancestors of modern swedes had brown skin.
 
7.7k years ago (which is the bare minimum of when it happened) they would've been lucky to have 'tribes' or the concept of 'divine favor' at all. Much more likely it was just the leader of a small band of hunters in a population bottleneck that later spread out across the area.



If anyone with black skin emerged from africa, why are australian aboriginals so different genetically from subsaharan africans?


I hope you aren't implying ala Varg Vikernes that white people inherit red and blond hair from Neanderthals, who had a completely unrelated gene for reddish hair. Also, Neanderthal DNA is only present in modern europeans at like 8% maximum, hardly what you'd call a single ancestor. And as far as it being the source of whiteness, Neanderthal DNA is also present in asians, though less pronounced, at around 2%. I'd also like to point out that, Neanderthals had the type of face that would be mocked on /pol/ if they lived today:
View attachment 671407
Hardly an Aryan beauty.

Dude, wut. Homo Ergaster went extinct 500,000 years ago, and looked like this:
View attachment 671403
I have no idea how you can compare the very very recent extinction of Homo Neandertalensis (40k) with the ultra ancient disappearance of Homo Ergaster. And how on earth would H. Ergaster contribute EXCLUSIVELY to asians, since it was geographically a pan-eurasian species?

That's a bold claim on a complicated subject. I'm not an authority, so I can't make a statement of that type, but what I will say is that despite genetic clustering, there is still a significant amount of overlap between the three racial groups genetically. More to the point, I think the existance of a mitochondrial eve isn't really relevant to the discussion of whether ancestors of modern swedes had brown skin.

There was interbreeding between the three is what I was getting at. And yeah, I am making really broad brush strokes, and will agree we don't know what REALLY went on tens of thousands of years ago. We do know however, and the evidence is pretty definitive, that the "out of Africa" theory is wrong, and provably so. Which was basically what I was getting at.
 
The Mitochondria is the power source of every cell in the human body. There is an issue though. Its not human. Yes. You heard that correctly. The Mitochondria is a symbiotic. An independent organism that works in harmony with a host (as opposed to a parasitic relationship). Sometime in very, very ancient history, a bacterium merged with animal cells and decided it would just hang out indefinitely. And unlike the cells in your body Mitochondria have their own separate and independent DNA. More importantly, their DNA is not subject to mixing in sexual reproduction. It reproduces asexually down the female genetic line exclusively. Which means children will have the exact same mitochondria as their mothers. And I mean that literally. They are identical in every way.
I see you played Parasite Eve too.
 
Back