The General Antisemitism Thread - OP uses a penis pump

I get the idea that I'm misunderstanding your post. Please clarify.
FWIW, the Coens have made it abundantly clear how jewish they are, if in no other way than with A Serious Man, which is a retelling of the Book of Job, and every character in it is a jew, except for 2 Koreans, if memory serves. I've even posted a screenshot set from that movie in this thread to illustrate jewish attitudes about non-jews.
See, I didn't see a serious man, that's too explicitly Jewish. Generally most Jewish media people insert talmudic tropes in whatever they make but subtly, in a way you can't really find it out, subversively even. This is the case with Ken levine, Adam sandler, Darren aronofsky, spielberg, even marvel and dc to some extent. When it comes to coen and raimi, they're probably subversive cause they're Jewish but I can't see it cause their films seem American enough. There's no racemixing, no goyim bashing, no simping for browns, no historical revisionism (albeit major ones cause o brother where art thou retcons the fact that the kkk had some Jewish members), no gender subversion, no golemism nothing of the sort. So I'm a bit confused, surely being yids they must impulsively do yid things no?
 
There’s so much that is mixed up that it is deliberate, primarily to make things so ambiguous that they can’t definitively say that Jews don’t come from Palestine. This type of obfuscation is deliberate. There are no coincidences when it comes to Jewish ethnicity.
Here was the paper I was talking about (was on mobile on the time and it wants to automatically download). If we are to look at their DNA from the papers we do have, only Jewish women have a claim to the Levant thanks to mtDNA. The Y DNA is all from South Europe/other sources. Does this mean Jews are white, as Leftists are fond of saying? No. They cluster separately from Europeans, as explained here.

One thing that has always bothered me is, on top of their 'We're the Chosen' mantra, is the idea that they're the smartest race and all human accomplishments come from them while the goyim floundered. If it sounds like the usual 'We Wuz Kangz' argument, it is, except things are inverted.
 
Nathan Cofnas used to do internet bloodsports with that angle. He wound up getting his shit pushed in by just about everybody so rather than admit he was wrong, now he just sticks to other Jews that subscribe to the “they hate us because they ain’t us” rhetoric.
 
1777241400525370.jpg
Weren't American soldiers called 'baby killers' when they went to Vietnam because the jews controlled the war and also the dissident left? When the soldiers came back something like that happened?
When do we get to call them that because of this and Palestine and... hold on there's loud knocking at my door.
 
no simping for browns, no historical revisionism (albeit major ones cause o brother where art thou retcons the fact that the kkk had some Jewish members), no gender subversion, no golemism nothing of the sort. So I'm a bit confused, surely being yids they must impulsively do yid things no?
Just one kind of unrelated (kind of not) detail about the KKK that it seems like some people don't know. Is the KKK hated catholics about as much as they hated blacks (at least from what I recall hearing). I'm from the south so it's just something I heard about living in places that had the KKK fairly close by. As a catholic I'm not a huge fan of those guys.

Really it's not surprising hearing that they took in some jewish members.
 
Last edited:
Really it's not surprising hearing that they took in some jewish members.
I lost the sources but I remember seeing newspaper articles from the 1900s and 1910s about two Jewish plantation owners who were part of the KKK. One had a son in wall street and one had two daughters (one supposedly was a lesbian horse trainer/rider). The Internet and AI says those sources don't exist but if I get them ill share them.

Edit: I think this is one of them
https://noirg.org/articles/jews-in-the-ku-klux-klan-1928-article-in-the-jewish-tribune/
 
Last edited:
Just one kind of unrelated (kind of not) detail about the KKK that it seems like some people don't know. Is the KKK hated catholics about as much as they hated blacks (at least from what I recall hearing). I'm from the south so it's just something I heard about living in places that had the KKK fairly close by. As a catholic I'm not a huge fan of those guys.

Really it's not surprising hearing that they took in some jewish members.
The KKK was founded by Southern Baptists and originally did not accept Jews. As for Catholics, I imagine the KKK shared the views of the northern Protestants on the "grosse darknes of popery which had covered and overspred the Christian worled". They viewed Catholics as anti-christ (opposed to Christ) and the pope as Antichrist, a man of sin and evil.

William Bradford's journal provides insight into the views of early Protestants. It was written in the Plymouth Colony from 1620-1647 and is the only primary source on Plymouth.
It is well knowne unto the godly and judicious, how ever since the first breaking out of the lighte of the gospell in our Honourable Nation of England, (which was the first of nations whom the Lord adorned ther with, affter that grosse darknes of popery which had covered and overspred the Christian worled,) what warrs and opposissions ever since, Satan hath raised, maintained, and continued against the Saincts, from time to time, in one sorte or other. Some times by bloody death and cruell torments; other whiles imprisonments, banishments, and other hard usages; as being loath his kingdom should goe downe, the trueth prevaile, and the chiuches of God reverte to their anciente puritie, and recover their primative order, hbertie, and hewtie. But when he could not prevaile by these means, against the maine trueths of the gospell, but that they began to take rootting in many places, being watered with the blooud of the martires, and blessed from heaven with a gracious encrease; He then begaine to take him to his anciente strategemes, used of old against the first Christians. That when by the bloody and barbarous persecutions of the Heathen Emperours, he could not stoppe and subuerte the course of the gospell, but that it speedily overspred with a wounderfull celeritie the then best known parts of the world, He then begane to sow errours, heresies, and wounderfull dissentions amongst the professours themlelves, (working upon their pride and ambition, with other corrupte passions incidente to all mortall men, yea to thes aints them selves in some measure,) by which wofull effects followed; as not only bitter contentions, and hartburnings, schismes, and ohter horrible confusions, but Satan tooke occasion and advantage therby to foyst in a number of vile eceremoneys, with many unproffitable cannons and decrees, which have since been as snares to many poore and peaceable souls even to this day. So as in the anciente times, the persecutions by the heathen and their Emperours, was not greater then of the Christians one against other; the Arians andother their comphces against the orthodoxe and true Christians.
The tiranous bishops are ejected, their courts dissolved, their cannons forceless, their servise casheired, their ceremonies uselese and despised; their plots for popery prevented, and all their superstitions discarded and returned to Roome from whence they came, and the monuments of idolatrie rooted out of the land. And the proud and profane suporters, and cruell defenders of these (as bloody papists and wicked athists, and their malignante consorts) marvelously over throwne.
 
To be fair, the modern Catholic Church has been infiltrated by Jews. In the past, they were more based, like when they hated Jews. Frankist Jews even plotted to infiltrate them, and I feel like they succeeded. A lot of Catholic pedophile priests are probably Frankists. (For context: Frankists are a group of Jews who believe that by sinning they can become "closer to God". And they like to infiltrate other religions to spread their degeneracy, while still secretly practicing Frankism.)
 
To be fair, the modern Catholic Church has been infiltrated by Jews. In the past, they were more based, like when they hated Jews. Frankist Jews even plotted to infiltrate them, and I feel like they succeeded. A lot of Catholic pedophile priests are probably Frankists. (For context: Frankists are a group of Jews who believe that by sinning they can become "closer to God". And they like to infiltrate other religions to spread their degeneracy, while still secretly practicing Frankism.)
maybe at some point, there was a problem with that. But at this point the Catholics, and a few of the other more traditional forms of Christianity are the only ones that aren't full on jew slaves are that almost entirely the reason the west supports Israel at all. Saying the modern catholic church is subverted by Jews, meanwhile dispensational protestants support Israel as much as the jews themselves. If not more. Because at least some of the traditional religious sects of Judaism don't actually support the existence of Israel. It's pretty much entirely secular jews, and despensationalist christians. That push the "judeo-christian" bullshit. Kind of feels like a misdirection at where the problem is. Epsecially now days. I actually feel better about being a catholic than ever. Back when the scandal happened you referenced, that seriously did hurt the catholic church in a way that has taken a long time to recover from it. That was well over 20 years ago.

Especially catholicism in the modern day, I would say it's one of the religions the jews most often attack, outside of muslims. And if they thought they could talk about catholics as openly as they talk about the way they do for muslims without having it effect their "special" relationship with the west, they would. Although they're showing their true colors more, and more, as well as the zionist jew slave sects of christianity. That is one thing Trump has unintentionally done a great job at exposing. By being the biggest shabos goy in history, he's actually helped the cause of exposing the jews, and their protestant servants to normal people that wouldn't have believed it, had it not been for Trump's unashamed bowing down to jewish influence over, and over, and over again.

The KKK was founded by Southern Baptists and originally did not accept Jews. As for Catholics, I imagine the KKK shared the views of the northern Protestants on the "grosse darknes of popery which had covered and overspred the Christian worled". They viewed Catholics as anti-christ (opposed to Christ) and the pope as Antichrist, a man of sin and evil.
I wouldn't exactly say the early protestants are very close to what protestants were from the 50's on. I especially don't think anything that happened around the time of the referendum reflects anything found here in modern America, particularly the baptists.

Over time, I really think a lot of the sects or the protestants have proven why having a heirarchy was important to maintain the ideals of the church. Besides the obvious for this thread, that being the dispensationalist, and the scopefield bible. That later created the shabos goy christians we have now (and have had for a while). But also the disgusting megachurch, televangialist grifters (who also tend to be Israel shills, likely because they're paid by the jews) that give even the worst popes of the past a run for their money, if not supersede what they were doing just out of sheer shamelessness of what they're doing. It's things like that, that make me think the anglican, orthodox, or catholosism was overall the right way.
 
Back
Top Bottom