The Internet Archive has excluded Kiwi Farms from its searches.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Aside from the EFF, I genuinely still think Null should try Matt Taibbi, although I'm not going to @ him about it again.

He's been on low dose redpills for several years, recently got peak transed, and has been writing more and more about internet censorship.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Autistic Joe
“Kiwifarms does ____”
>prove it
“It says so here on this article I wrote!”
>what’s your source for that quote there?
>it kind of seems like you’re trying to manufacture a narrative here
“*deletes archive*”

nice journalism you lying bastards.
At this point, anyone who goes along with this is a pedophile or pedophile apologist.
 
I haven't torrented anything in 20 years. Ideally I would like to be able to have this archived version and just host it on a separate computer. I don't know how this will work.

I understand that:

-use torrent program to get file (which is the safe one these days?)
-have a hard drive large enough to store the file, or (maybe 2 to do Raid 1? dont remember how to do that) Or just have 2 HDDs and have a copy on each
-once you have the file how do you navigate it? Would it look the same as the online version if you had the right program?

Can anyone expand on this, and perhaps we can make a guide for dummies.
 
Wait a sec, this does not make sense on their part. Shouldn't they be actively sharing "receipts" plus cherry picking archive links to prove their point? And shouldn't the poor victims be sharing how the threads were total slander? Like how one would collect and present evidence for a criminal case. Instead they're all "source: trust me bro" on it, and normies just eat that up. I was expecting at least some low effort best-hits compilation ("look at the amount of gamer words in one thread!").

I vaguely remember that even the chans got more "receipts" posted to prove that they are baddie sites. But for kiwifarms so far I've seen not even a handful of fedposts and little else.
 
I'm trying to understand how excluding the domain works. That would only prevent archived instances of this forum, not someone going out and archiving stupid shit people say elsewhere, right?
Thanks for the answer, but I'm still unclear on whether new pages can be archived or not after this decision?
They will archive it, but not show it.

i've been having difficulties with internet archive / wayback machine for a couple of weeks. it's dropped tasks in the middle of archiving, skewed the source https, and given false archive links when it does complete the task. after reading this, i went through my screenshots of the errors, and discovered that most of the errors happened when what i was trying to archive was found by using "kiwifarms" or "kiwi farms" for the initial search, specifically when searching on twitter. the archives that i created from random scrolling or from news articles have gone through, even if there was a queue. my suspicion is that the captures are being throttled with keywords, as well as the actual archives being made unavailable to the public.
 
Wait a sec, this does not make sense on their part. Shouldn't they be actively sharing "receipts" plus cherry picking archive links to prove their point? And shouldn't the poor victims be sharing how the threads were total slander? Like how one would collect and present evidence for a criminal case. Instead they're all "source: trust me bro" on it, and normies just eat that up. I was expecting at least some low effort best-hits compilation ("look at the amount of gamer words in one thread!").

I vaguely remember that even the chans got more "receipts" posted to prove that they are baddie sites. But for kiwifarms so far I've seen not even a handful of fedposts and little else.
Because too many people trust the media when they lie. Now, they don't even HAVE to provide receipts for people to lap it up. They just have to be "on the right side of history".

You know those obviously bullshit "articles" or posts your cringey right wing parents, aunts, and uncles post on facebook that make you go "who the fuck in their right mind would believe this"? Well that's what the media is for the twitterati. Trust, don't verify.
 
Wait a sec, this does not make sense on their part. Shouldn't they be actively sharing "receipts" plus cherry picking archive links to prove their point? And shouldn't the poor victims be sharing how the threads were total slander? Like how one would collect and present evidence for a criminal case. Instead they're all "source: trust me bro" on it, and normies just eat that up. I was expecting at least some low effort best-hits compilation ("look at the amount of gamer words in one thread!").

I vaguely remember that even the chans got more "receipts" posted to prove that they are baddie sites. But for kiwifarms so far I've seen not even a handful of fedposts and little else.

There still has been 0 proof, or even a statement that ANY law enforcement was ever contacted over that VERY SCARY VERY REAL bomb threat.

He had a meltdown that his life was in danger because he said he was going to a restaurant and then someone posted within 5 minutes that they had people go out planting bombs at every restaurant in the area.

Now you would think this is INCREDIBLY concerning since he took it seriously, and proved it has imminent danger to his life and he wouldn't go out. Yet didn't bother to report it to the authorities for himself, let alone call the DOZENS PF RESTAURANTS WITH ACTIVE BOMBS. Now you would think a person that has an active terrorist group that is ready and willing to within 10 minutes be out on the streets planting bombs would be a HUGE interest to authorities, ignoring the narcissistic worthless FAGGOT seemingly unconcerned with the possible thousands of innocent people about to die that he didn't bother warning.

So has any authority contacted Josh go try and get information on thoa terrorist cell? Mr. Keffals? If you knew this was happening who would you contact: an internet company providing DDOS protection to a webforum that as ignored your cries for a decade.... or the police?

Keep in mind the "clear and present imminent danger" from cloudflare has still never been stated
 
"They're threatening to dismember my family"

"They have pictures of things I said on Twitter"

That's an interesting goalpost shift. Could you imagine 3 years ago the idea of you being banned off the internet for posting a picture of what someone else said on the internet, that nothing happened to them about?

The next step is going to be "that's a doctored image, prove it isn't". Absolute Pedophiles.
 
-use torrent program to get file (which is the safe one these days?)

-once you have the file how do you navigate it? Would it look the same as the online version if you had the right program?
1. qbittorent seems to be pretty bloat-free from my experience (someone correct me if it's full of glowy shit). If you trust the torrent source, the risk is minimized.

2. This is the part that interests me. Pages can be saved offline very easily, but I'm not sure how well the formatting, embeded media, navigational structure and intra-site links will be presevered. It would be trivial to search the whole site dump for plain text html, but that would be cumbersome for the inexperienced. You'd have to know the regular expressions you're searching for.

Someone please weigh in if you know more.
 
I literally can’t imagine the EFF siding with the corporate censors.
It would be a terrible look for them to try to defend the site. It doesn't seem like it would go against their mission at all, but it would be a huge detriment to their reputation they've built over the decades.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Toolbox
This person is taking credit for the site getting removed from internet archive.
View attachment 3684485
View attachment 3684506

They tweeted out something asking for Internet Archive to take it all down, with one message even including this:
View attachment 3684513
That's Bex. She has a thread here and a MATI person stream. She is a fake jew wanting Israeli citizenship known for starting drama online and were she used to work, Riot Games. Twitter Jews do not like her because she tweets things about Judaism that are incorrect. Most of the people tweeting about Kiwifarms have threads on the site or are friends with those who have threads.

I literally can’t imagine the EFF siding with the corporate censors. I know you’ve got a lot on your plate but @Null it may be worth reaching out to them about this ridiculous precedent of the site getting nuked off by huge corporations without breaking a single law. It’s a serious danger to the free Internet, I can’t imagine them not being sympathetic.
Go to defcon and talk to them at their booth. I have no faith in these people after speaking with them. Much like the ACLU, the ones who stuck the the mission statement are gone or were radicalized.
 
Last edited:
Back