Sperg Coalition
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
If you meant derived distributions then yes.Shlack is Russian noun for something shitty.
Literally shitware.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you meant derived distributions then yes.Shlack is Russian noun for something shitty.
Literally shitware.
1. Why use Enveavor when you can just learn to install Arch linuxStill debating whether I wanna stick to SUSE Tumbleweed or switch to Debian, Endeavour or Fedora/Nobara.
1. Fair, Arch has been on my mind as well lmao1. Why use Enveavor when you can just learn to install Arch linux
2. Debian. Switch to Debian. Debian 11 not 12, as things are just a bit more stable.
All I want for Christmas are real NVIDIA open sourced drivers
Linux Mint is on the fence about completely switching to Debian?
That's a bullshit excuse. China is more than capable of reverse engineering microchip architectures and microcode and has already done so in the past. They could just buy a bunch of reference boards and work backwards from there. The main barrier they face isn't the architecture, but the manufacturing process.I fully understand, I wish they would also but I also understand their position, if they made drivers open source, the Chinese would clone their video cards and other technologies driving down their sales on a massive level.
Sorry I am responding 2 post in a row but Clem, the lead developer and dictator of Linux Mint has said there are no plans to switch to Debian for their flagships. LMDE only gets attention when it first comes out, then not used much.
Has that proven to be an issue with Amd or Intel chips?I fully understand, I wish they would also but I also understand their position, if they made drivers open source, the Chinese would clone their video cards and other technologies driving down their sales on a massive level.
They're really petty about it as well. In the HDMI consortium they pushed through a rule saying that HDMI2.1 isn't allowed to be implemented in anything open source. As a result, AMD GPUs on Linux aren't able to do 4k@120 or 8k@60, they're limited to 4k@60 or hideous and absolutely unusable chroma 4NVIDIA just hates open source. It's as simple as that.
moneyI've yet to see a single good argument why HDMI2.1 should be closed-source only.
I would suspect that Nvidia's drivers have a lot of skeletons in the closet just like AMD's did. When AMD first tried going open source and merging into the Linux Kernel one of the Kernel devs did a review and blew his top, in about an hour the guy apparently removed a thousand lines of dead code before he ragequit the process and denied the merge request and fired off a scathing email to AMD's crew. I can certainly see why Nvidia wouldn't want to get involved with doing open source drivers, it requires a higher level of professionalism because you can't play ghetto games over bugs and security issues, its either done right the first time or you get absolutely fucking wrecked.I fully understand, I wish they would also but I also understand their position, if they made drivers open source, the Chinese would clone their video cards and other technologies driving down their sales on a massive level.
Remember when NVIDIA kept getting caught cheating at 3DMark? Pretty sure there's a lot in there they'd rather keep secret.I would suspect that Nvidia's drivers have a lot of skeletons in the closet just like AMD's did. When AMD first tried going open source and merging into the Linux Kernel one of the Kernel devs did a review and blew his top, in about an hour the guy apparently removed a thousand lines of dead code before he ragequit the process and denied the merge request and fired off a scathing email to AMD's crew. I can certainly see why Nvidia wouldn't want to get involved with doing open source drivers, it requires a higher level of professionalism because you can't play ghetto games over bugs and security issues, its either done right the first time or you get absolutely fucking wrecked.
1. Fair, Arch has been on my mind as well lmao
2. I'm fine with either Debian install, I'm mostly between Debian and Tumbleweed
I really like Peppermint OS for an old laptop. I've had it work really well on absurdly shitty Compaq laptops as well as very elderly Apple laptops (elderly to the point Apple stops even providing security updates).There are others but I didn't stick with them for long or just didn't like them.
I really like Peppermint OS for an old laptop. I've had it work really well on absurdly shitty Compaq laptops as well as very elderly Apple laptops (elderly to the point Apple stops even providing security updates).
Also just being Xfce for the DE is always good in my book.
Because GTK=good. GNOME=FUCK YOU.
That's actually a plus for me. I utterly hate how shit looks now.As for XFCE, I never gave it a fair shake because of how ancient it looks.
Shift+PrintScreen on GNOME (which uses screenshot) or Win+Shift+PrintScreen on KDE (which uses spectacle)I know this has probably been asked before, but does anyone have any good recommendations for screenshot software? I am looking for something akin to Lightshot on Windows but so far a lot of what I found on the Archwiki is a hassle to setup or doesn’t have an option to hit print screen, select an area, and then auto save without having to specify what kind of selection I want every time I hit print screen.
open your keyboard settingsI know this has probably been asked before, but does anyone have any good recommendations for screenshot software? I am looking for something akin to Lightshot on Windows but so far a lot of what I found on the Archwiki is a hassle to setup or doesn’t have an option to hit print screen, select an area, and then auto save without having to specify what kind of selection I want every time I hit print screen.
xfce4-screenshooter -r
)