- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Yeah, the stigma of that it's not "real Linux" just because it comes preloaded with all the essentials 99% of people would need, and that for the real Linux experience you need Debian/Arch/Gentoo etc. Mint is still real Linux, you can rm -rf the living shit out of your system on it as well as on any other.Is there a stigma?
The stigma/misconception assumes that if Mint aims to be as accessible and "just werks" as Windows, it does so by being as locked down as Windows. It's not, it's still as powerful as any other Linux distro, it's just that unlike something like Arch, you start off with a working system that you'll be breaking as you fuck around in the terminal and learn Linux.
Mint is the distro to recommend for beginners, as they'll get an unfucked Ubuntu for a solid starting base, and if they're willing to go deeper they can break that, or get comfortable in a distro that just works, doesn't get in their way and does what they need it to do. If a beginner gets comfortable with Linux from that, then I'd say a good exercise to learn Linux further would be installing Debian without a DE and then setting something up from the headless mode. The entry point is lower than Arch, the environment is more familiar, and you do more intermediate things to get comfortable with Linux.
Yeah basically the bloat that's the issue is the shit that runs in the background, not what sits on the hard drive. How much of this apparent "bloat" of Windows/Mint ultimately runs in the background, and how much of it just sits dormant in the install to be invoked when a piece of software needs it to run? A ton of this "bloat" is actually a good thing as it allows your OS to do it's job: run the software you need to run to do your work. And people want their OS to do just that, not for Microsoft to tell them what they want to do, or to fuck around for hours to try and make the tiniest, most riced out setup.edit oh. reading it again. i think I understand what you meant by the second thing.