Idontknowanything404why
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2025
I use arch btw
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kinda forced to, at the moment, because RTX 50xx GPUs only officially work nvidia-open, and Arch is the most painless option for it. Still NVK sucks, and I don't see how RedHat trannies fix it any time soon.I use arch btw
I've tried Void and have had nothing but issues with the touchpad firmware deciding not to load after reboots, or the internet randomly going out. I don't think it's a hardware issue since it never happened on Alpine. Non-systemds distros almost always have manual intervention quirks systemd distros don't have, and that can waste a lot of unnecessary time.Or if someone is fine not using systemd at all. Void pretty similar in stability to gentoo from my experience, and you get a tui installer. Opensuse, and fedora, should be as easy to install as any other distro and should be fairly stable while you get either rolling with tumbleweed, or a fairly fast moving release based distro. With those, I think it might matter what hardware you use, and how much having proprietary drivers matter to you, on how viable they are.
The "improved" file-roller is fucking dog shit. I used it for years because it integrated smoothly into PCManFM, now half the functionality has been stripped out...for reasons?? You used to be able to select a compression level for formats that supported it too. And of course the gui is i a big ugly gnome window too.Is there an archive manager that just fucking works? I am using EndeavourOS and file-roller has been updated and improved by removing the drag and drop to extract feature. Insert "use case for drag and drop to extract" meme here.
I switched to xarchiver for some time but this too fails to extract by drag and drop 80% of the time. I am very close to just extracting stuff by terminal at this point.
Like what?Non-systemds distros almost always have manual intervention quirks systemd distros don't have, and that can waste a lot of unnecessary time.
Take the OFM pill, where your file manager is an archive manager, and it handles archives much like folders. Double Commander, Krusader, Midnight Commander, choose your poison.Is there an archive manager that just fucking works? I am using EndeavourOS and file-roller has been updated and improved by removing the drag and drop to extract feature. Insert "use case for drag and drop to extract" meme here.
I switched to xarchiver for some time but this too fails to extract by drag and drop 80% of the time. I am very close to just extracting stuff by terminal at this point.
Are those distros compatible with systemd unit files so installing stuff that's outside of distro maintained repos tends to work? I'd like to try S6 but my current setup justworks™Like what?
And the void thing sounds unlucky, I guess. I never experienced anything like that with it. It was pretty much like my experience with arch, which is to say. Things tended to just work. Outside of using their musl version at least.

I would never advise anyone to leave a setup that currently works for them for one that *might* work for them.I'd like to try S6 but my current setup justworks™
The only thing that has s6 that I know of is artix. At least that can be set up for you by default. With artix. Generally they have the service scripts available for you. But you need to make sure you install the networkmanager-s6 or dhcpcd-runit, or whatever package -whatever init. Otherwise you won't get the scripts. And the aur actually does tend to have alt-init packages available.Are those distros compatible with systemd unit files so installing stuff that's outside of distro maintained repos tends to work? I'd like to try S6 but my current setup justworks™
View attachment 7630838


My understanding is that it was built on rpm-ostree (like a Fedora Atomic image) and is immutable, unlike a typical desktop OS.Wait, Bazzite doesn't support rpms?
It does with rpm-ostree, but it's very slow and they want to replace it with bootc. Flatpak is Bazzite's recommended method of installing apps.Wait, Bazzite doesn't support rpms?
In fairness, that's the way all KDE file managers worked thanks to the beauty of kdeio since KDE 2 at least, if not back to KDE 1. Wouldn't be surprised if they managed to ruin it in future of course. Wouldn't it be better if systemd handled all access to files?Take the OFM pill, where your file manager is an archive manager, and it handles archives much like folders. Double Commander, Krusader, Midnight Commander, choose your poison.
Shh! Don't give Red Hat ideas!Wouldn't it be better if systemd handled all access to files?
What's really the point of an immutable distro if you must maintain it like any other distro with only the added difficulty of dealing with a read only system? I personally don't get it.
Immutable distros are inherently vendor locked. SteamOS? Vendor Locked and hardware locked. Bazzite? Well whoever makes Bazzite. They seem terrible for personal use. However they seem brilliant for hardware vendors or IT departments in enterprise settings.Oh, and given the use of a cloud build system on github/gitlab, I can see this being another avenue for vendor lock-in. Splendid!
He appeared at a Linux convention fairly recently. Surprisingly, they published a recording of the talk.He did a podcast with Brodie Robertson. You can hear the instant he opens his mouth (skip to 0:36 if you hate Brodie's voice) that he is a troon, or at best a they/them.
immutable/atomic distros are the thing I really don't see the point of. Of all the newer movements in the Linux world. At least not the way they are being pushed as some answer to the Linux for normies question.My understanding is that it was built on rpm-ostree (like a Fedora Atomic image) and is immutable, unlike a typical desktop OS.
The only real way to install packages on these is Flatpaks.