- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Said the stupid retarded nigger bringing back a retarded drama from a few pages ago.You're just a stupid retarded nigger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Said the stupid retarded nigger bringing back a retarded drama from a few pages ago.You're just a stupid retarded nigger.
My bad for not checking the threads I watch at every waking hour, some of us have things to do.Said the stupid retarded nigger bringing back a retarded drama from a few pages ago.
I rather like making it look like Windows 95.You can make xfce look as nice as you want, or if people don't care they can leave it as is. But you aren't stuck with it looking like it does out of the box.
And then get an eyesore when some piece of software doesn't follow the scheme or is missing an icon, try to make everything as uniform as possible, give up and go back to modern themes. Usually that's how using those retro themes ends up, be it Linux or Windows.I rather like making it look like Windows 95.


And then get an eyesore when some piece of software doesn't follow the scheme or is missing an icon, try to make everything as uniform as possible, give up and go back to modern themes. Usually that's how using those retro themes ends up, be it Linux or Windows.
My point is that you can do this sort of retro theming to an extent on Windows as well, and both that and Linux suffers from the same issue: modern software with modern aesthetics that doesn't hook into the same Win32/GTK/Qt/whatever UI library will look out of place, and the more you try to make everything look consistent the more tedious it'll get until you decide to give up on nostalgia and just stick to the modern themes where they won't clash as hard.If Linux ever gets a proper analogue to the "Classic" theme on Windows 7, it will forever be superior to modern M$ slop.
I like Denshi's stuff. He makes guides for a lot of random software, mostly server stuff. You really don't need much to install most of these things. Set up an XMPP server and pester your friends to move from der 'cord and then try to stop them from uploading warrior.pngThis is gonna sound retarded but are there good resources for finding stuff to do on Linux with an i686 laptop
It runs antix fine but now I need to find stuff to do with it
Pretty decent options for this if you go full kde plasma ecosystem. Daily drove the seven or vista theme for a couple months. Was nice.If Linux ever gets a proper analogue to the "Classic" theme on Windows 7, it will forever be superior to modern M$ slop. Unfortunately, IceWM scratches the itch but stops shy of getting rid of the itch entirely.
It's alone on the disk. I tried booting into recovery mode but that didn't do anything for 15 minutes so I just left it. No error messages though. The last thing I did install some games to steam and change my desktop background.Is it alone on the disk? Are there any other details? can you check what any of the error messages were? was there a recent update? what were the things you did on the last boot before this happened?
It's probably pretty easily fixable. Although I've never seen anyone with a linux mint system that suddenly didn't boot, in my recollection.
It's alone on the disk. I tried booting into recovery mode but that didn't do anything for 15 minutes so I just left it. No error messages though. The last thing I did install some games to steam and change my desktop background.

Fair enough - these utilities can still be further improved and you and I both know that porting to Rust isn't part of that. But where you say you don't see anyone sensible alleging that it is, well, the "sensible" part gives you a get-out but right on the project page they do say that improved performance is one of the goals of the project. It's easy to read that and imagine they mean Rust helps there, because if that's actually your goal, you can just do it in C.Yes, it is possible to get a performance upgrade in many basic utilities by rewriting them in the modern age. The old utilities were written to avoid using large amounts of memory (which was not in great abundance) and to avoid disk reads/writes at all costs. Much faster utilities are possible without holding yourself to these constraints.
They do the rewrite in Rust because that's their modern niggercattle language of choice. I don't see anyone sensible alleging that it's the porting from C as a language specifically that's going to prduce a performance boost.
Speaking to that, one person on Phoronix made a good point that without the shared library base there'd be much more bloat to the Rust utils, to which someone replied with their bare face hanging out that they had "solved" this by just having one binary. So all the core utils in the Rust version are actually just one binary with lots of hard links to it under every name. Call itOf course, the Rust utilities they produce take about a hundred times more disk space, but again, going from a 50 kB executable to a 5 MB one isn't going to be of concern to many users today.
sort and it will behave like sort. (Hopefully)You understand that MATE is literally just Gnome 2, deprecated in 2010, kept updated by spergs that really, really hated Gnome 3 right? It's not a corporate sponsored corporate maintained environment, it's old code kept running by the grace of god by a really stubborned programmer or 3.MATE is so shitty im not sure why any distro would take them seriously and offer them as an official spin and want them on their website. what Red Hat does is just above being associated with the MATE guys. half of the programs it ships with by default don't work, at all, so you have to spend a lot of time cleaning out unusable bloatware. your customization options with mate are about zero unless you can code styling themes for yourself. This is also the only DE that ever crashed on me, or have bugs like the screenshot manager and a bunch of application menus stop working because I changed a theme setting.
XFCE has always been a lightweight, feature light environment. Years ago I used to run it on a Pentium 3 way past it's prime and I've always liked how snappy it is on modern hardware, because unlike KDE & Gnome the developers didn't rewrite the entire thing every time they got bored so it's really the same core code I ran 20 years ago.i have a bias towards XFCE because of its more customizable panels and it's receiving what I perceive to be the highest amount of support on customization websites. i think it's slightly inferior to KDE and wayland in ways that don't bother me that much. i've put XFCE on my devices for what I think is permanently.
Current Gnome is highly recommended for anyone with a lobotomy that doesn't mind everything being shit.GNOME is what i would recommend to a guy that's aged under 14 and over 50 years old, or suffering from a similar handicap. or i would want it on an iPad or something retarded i barely use.
Well see that's the thing. I don't actually know what I'm doing wrong. I didn't do anything really on this Mint install outside of installing Nivida drivers to get my second monitor to work and fiddling switch steam to try to get some games to work. Outside of that this is a completely new Mint install. I can't tell you what you need to know because I don't know what it is you need to know.With all due respect, homie: you need to give us more information on the circumstances leading up to you ending up in busyshell (isn't that part of busybox?). You literally go from "should I delete Mint and start over?" to "mint won't boot on my PC."
View attachment 8175783
Looking over your post history, it seems like you weren't getting bottlenecked by anything beyond user application woes before you came to this thread saying your Mint install won't boot. If you're unable to fill in the gaps that your short, uninformative posts leave wide open, I'm afraid we can't help you. We really do need more information than you've been giving us thus far.
Or if you use a touchscreen device for some reason, as far as I know its still the only DE with the most refined touchscreen supportCurrent Gnome is highly recommended for anyone with a lobotomy that doesn't mind everything being shit.
The state of keyboard launchers on both Windows and Linux is a sorry state. On Windows, the two main contenders are Keypirinha and Flow Launcher. The former is fantastically lightweight and fast, but it's been abandoned and has many issues. Flow Launcher on the other hand is actively maintained, blows Keypirinha out of the water in terms of features, usability and most importantly plugin ecosystem, but it's C# bloat and has some performance issues.Krunner is an honest argument why people should be using it full-time. there's krunner alternatives and slightly similar programs you can use on other DE's, like Rofi, but none of them are a fraction as good as krunner. Learning Rofi is like being tortured and krunner is just good out of the box.
no equivalent for it on Linux
Just to list some of my daily uses:
-launching programs and games
-looking up files, with Everything it's instantaneous
-doing calculations, unit and currency conversions
-translating words and phrases
-quickly killing stuck processes
-shutting down and restarting
Other plugins I don't use so often:
-switching between open windows
-looking up Vim commands
-converting strings like MD5
-adjusting screen brightness
-ejecting USB drives