- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
OK, the 'debate' is over. Those pushing Wayland adoption are UNQUESTIONABLY in a conspiracy against the adoption of desktop Linux.
Why do I feel entirely justified in saying this? It's pretty simple.
Why do I feel entirely justified in saying this? It's pretty simple.
- The largest players in pushing adoption of desktop Linux are always large governmental entities, generally in Europe, but sometimes in freer countries like China and the DPRK. These are also some of the best funders of development that actually advances individuals and smaller governments and companies being able to adopt Linux and open source productivity software (like improving OpenOffice/LibreOffice formatting interchangeability with Office).
- Those governmental entities are mandated to care about accessibility. For example, for people who don't have 20/20 vision.
- KDE and Gnome developers are, as of a few months ago, more than a decade after the Wayland cancer emerged, still adding workarounds for core Wayland problems like 'screen readers not being able to access the window title to tell a blind user what window they're on'.