The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I've been told that if NVIDIA goes full FOSS, AMD and Intel could get a better understanding of how their high end GPUs work and then NVIDIA would have actual competition. NVIDIA can't have that.
This is retarded. Their high end cards aren't anything special, just the small ones but bigger. AMD couldn't afford to be in the high end GPU race because they only make up less than 10% of the market share and so they stopped competing. No sense in trying to compete in the "My GPU is bigger than your GPU" race if no one buys them and your competition keeps rebranding their premium tier cards as consumer grade.
 
I've been told that if NVIDIA goes full FOSS, AMD and Intel could get a better understanding of how their high end GPUs work and then NVIDIA would have actual competition. NVIDIA can't have that.
Counterpoint: AMD still cannot figure out their own drivers (this is anecdotal, but after switching from Intel iGPU + NVIDIA dGPU to AMD + AMD, it's been nothing but hangs/timeouts, until applying some magical kernel cmdline option, so now it crashes only sometimes, not every day), so I'm pressing X on their ability to do anything useful with NVIDIA's code. Besides, most of the "interesting" stuff is done by firmware anyway, which isn't open source.
 
Not (quite) an argument, when the average FOSS coder (who can't even do some proper gatekeeping and now their project is co-opted by troons) can barely scrape by, and only contributes out of the kindness of his heart but can barely afford to pay the bills.

The normiest of normies, ultimately, pay your damn bills. Not the Stallman autistic types, eating the dead skin off their feet.

That's what the Blender guys finally understood, and the results speak for themselves.
What I took from this guy's video is that the big problem with "open source software" is some of it isn't designed for users like him, and my response is that it's not a problem. There will be knock-on effects for not designing for the largest group of people, like getting zero funding for the software, but it's not a problem.

It's the equivalent of saying the big problem with Hank Williams is that he didn't play at the Apollo, and if he had focused on playing music that would have fit Apollo patrons so he could have played there, it would have fixed the problem. No, he didn't set out to play music for the Apollo. (Note: I am not saying GIMP is equivalent to Hank Williams. GIMP is autistic software that I will never recommend to anyone.)
 
I just need Darktable to not suck, and it does. Actually one of my bigger complaints about it is that it needlessly apes Lightroom's editing paradigms. And that its primary competitors are either dead or barely-maintained.
I use Darktable, it works well enough for the 3 actual photos a year I take.

Similarly I use OpenShot when I need to edit a video once a year. I'm not sure how it would do if I was still doing twice a month videos of meetings where I had to merge off-camera audio with the video and they had a slightly different rate which meant Adobe Audition was a life saver. I'd probably just do it CLI these days.
 
I once watched a video by Atomic Shrimp on getting Davinci Resolve working in Linux. Basically, it was the one important software he used that was keeping him from fully switching from Windows to Linux, but the Linux port of Davinci and its installer is a buggy piece of shit that often fails to install or work right. Eventually he found someone else had made a script for Linux Mint that babysits the installer and makes sure it's working properly, and was finally able to get the program working on Linux that way.

The installer worked from what I could tell. The program didn't though. And looking at the list of his problems it seems like what he ran into were different from what I ran into. He was saying the installer would just crash, and the one where it says it was unstable in operation is listing features as missing on not function.

And really in the end. I don't know why I would waste time trying to make a proprietary program, that chose to make their linux support for rocky linux only, which screams to me that they definitely don't care about a person like me using their software at all (at least choose debian as the supported platform for fucks sake). When I can just run kdenlive. Which does just work, it's open source. And I've never had any real problems with it even though I only run rolling release distros.

What distro would you install, and what for?
I'm going to have to check this out. From the sound of it, I can't wait to finally buy one... five or ten years from now when the used ones hit the reseller market for 200 dollars (like the current 2019-2020 ones are at this point)
 
don't know why I would waste time trying to make a proprietary program, that chose to make their linux support for rocky linux only, which screams to me that they definitely don't care about a person like me using their software at all (at least choose debian as the supported platform for fucks sake)

Counterpoint: Fedora's got lpf - the "local package factory," a set of python scripts meant to convert DEB binaries into RPM ones. lpf-spotify-client is what lets you set up Spotify on a Red Hat distro without actually needing a Debian variant. Surely there should be some equivalent to lpf that converts the DaVinci Resolve binary from RPM to DEB. Tons of shit in the AUR for proprietary software does the same thing, where PKGBUILDs fetch the DEB/RPM of $insert_program_here and then convert it into a pkg.tar.xz or pkg.tar.zst or whatever the hell Arch's packaging format is nowadays.
 
Counterpoint: Fedora's got lpf - the "local package factory," a set of python scripts meant to convert DEB binaries into RPM ones. lpf-spotify-client is what lets you set up Spotify on a Red Hat distro without actually needing a Debian variant. Surely there should be some equivalent to lpf that converts the DaVinci Resolve binary from RPM to DEB. Tons of shit in the AUR for proprietary software does the same thing, where PKGBUILDs fetch the DEB/RPM of $insert_program_here and then convert it into a pkg.tar.xz or pkg.tar.zst or whatever the hell Arch's packaging format is nowadays.
I'm not saying you can't install it on debian. And in arch their is an aur pkgbuild for it.

What I'm saying is picking rocky linux as the platform they supported says a lot to me. It's a decision only a proprietary company would make. Anyone with any kind of sense if they were going to make a single release, and support one distro. They would pick debian, because it's what people actually use (a lot of the time through forks like ubuntu or mint, or the thousand others).

Instead they picked a distro that is only used by maybe some subsect of corporate users. Even then I imagine many would just use RHEL instead.

I don't use debian based distros. But it's pretty self evident that debian is the standard linux platform. It or ubuntu (or mint but mint makes more sense for a desktop), is also one of the more reasonable choices for a workstation, or a server.

It just screams they don't give a fuck about the people using their product through linux. And telling people to install a custom distro just to use one application says that even more. And that's their perogative, but I don't want to use their shit. And I would say my experience trying to use their editor backs that up.

Just use arch, Davinci just works when using the AUR package.
That was the platform i tried it on. The installer worked. The program didn't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Somewhat related.
> It has the new thin keyboard and the annoyingly large touchpad.
> AI PC
> Fucking copilot button lmao
> Only two USB-A slots
> Low temperature solder (SSD, fingerprint reader module, WUXGA panel)
> IME still present
> Free BIOS not provided
> I bet it has the worse "brick" style of docking station, instead of the better "stand" style.

I'm not feeling it. Also, the video could have been maybe half the length and not have lost any information.
But then I am not the target demographic for this laptop. When I'm on my laptop, I only really edit text. So the T61 has more than enough power for me.
 
it's pretty self evident that debian is the standard linux platform
I'd go a little further and call Debian the lowest common denominator of Linux. Not that there's anything wrong with it, but regardless of what your optimization requirement is, there's probably a distro that does it better unless your requirement is "wide install base".
 
> I bet it has the worse "brick" style of docking station, instead of the better "stand" style.
WDYM by this? Stand style like the old ones that connected to the bottom of laptop?
Why would you want this nowadays, thunderbolt/usb-c docks are just superior, they work with all modern laptops, no need to be vendor locked. Sure there are some kinks that need to be straighten, like no common protocol for waking up laptop from dock. Not like that was possible with older docks either tho, for obvious reasons.

Moreover it should make a path for phones being finally usable as "desktop" internet machines for most people. Though it is still stagnant sector for no good reason.

edit: I wish 7 row keyboard would came back. But that's probably never gonna happen. :'(
 
Moreover it should make a path for phones being finally usable as "desktop" internet machines for most people. Though it is still stagnant sector for no good reason.
The Pinephone is compatible with USB-C docks, plus the Purism phone I think. Maybe Android could be coerced into doing this if the open, aftermarket versions of it start supporting stuff like this. It would take a miracle for iOS to start supporting it, but miracles do sometimes happen.
 
The Pinephone is compatible with USB-C docks, plus the Purism phone I think. Maybe Android could be coerced into doing this if the open, aftermarket versions of it start supporting stuff like this. It would take a miracle for iOS to start supporting it, but miracles do sometimes happen.
Ipads with a keyboard are already effectively full desktop replacements for some enterprise users
At work there's a dedicated apple development team and I asked them why they were using ipads instead of macs and they said the iPad does everything they need it to
 
The Pinephone is compatible with USB-C docks, plus the Purism phone I think. Maybe Android could be coerced into doing this if the open, aftermarket versions of it start supporting stuff like this. It would take a miracle for iOS to start supporting it, but miracles do sometimes happen.
There is DeX from Samsung, and some other projects. But they mostly sucks.
IMHO if Samsung were to make it a bigger deal and put some marketing money into DeX, apple would come up with answer to that as well.
It's just there is very little interest into it still, as most people aren't even that aware of it being possible.
 
The Pinephone is compatible with USB-C docks, plus the Purism phone I think. Maybe Android could be coerced into doing this if the open, aftermarket versions of it start supporting stuff like this. It would take a miracle for iOS to start supporting it, but miracles do sometimes happen.
Ubuntu Touch also has this feature, and is quite nice to use if put on a "fully supported" device of somewhat recent make, i.e. Volla or Fairphone.

I just like placing my laptop on it, and it clicking in, more than connecting a usb-c cable, but that's a personal preference. I had no idea the usb-c docks aren't vendor locked, that's cool.
Both the T480 and W541 have excellent docks, the tactile click is pure kino. Just wish that the latter had a 7-row mod available. Might have to polish up my Chinese and spring for a modded board. One of them even has Coreboot (with ME gutting) and is essentially a T480 jammed into a retro 13" chassis.
 
Everyone's working so hard just to mimick a fraction of the Motorola Lapdock's rizz. 2011, people!

motorola-atrix_dock-main-lg-3377028496.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom