🐱 The MAP and the MOP, the debate on these groups that seek to normalize pedophilia

CatParty

(Translated)

The cyber police have warned of the risks of abuse against minors online and citizens have managed to lower profiles of people who promote pedophilia, considered a mental disorder


They are associated with a flag to identify themselves, they celebrate one day a year, and affirm that their practices are not an abuse: it is about people who claim to feel sexual and loving attraction to children .

Those who identify with these practices have allegedly constituted a movement under the acronym: MAP (Minor Attracted Persons) or MOP (Movement Pride Pedophile) .

They are people who maintain that their attraction to minors, especially boys and girls at puberty, is not related to sexual abuse and even equates it with a sexual orientation.


In Mexico, the cyber police have warned about the risks that minors are more often exposed to pornographic content because with the “new normal” they spend more time on the Internet, especially to take classes.


Every week , at least 10 reports of profiles, messages or web pages with contents of sexual incidents against minors are received, according to figures from the cyber police. To stop these profiles, the authorities call to denounce and not to share the contents or click on them , according to a statement.

These practices are part of what is known as pedophilia, which is considered a "sexual disorder" by the World Health Organization(WHO). "(Pedophilic disorder) is described as a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal, manifested by thoughts, fantasies, intense desires or persistent sexual behaviors that involve prepubescent boys or girls," according to the organization.


Even WHO it includes pedophilia in its International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in force and which come into force in 2022 that status will continue, according to WHO sources quoted by the agency EFE.

The MAP and the MOP seek to have their practices accepted socially and have allegedly asked the WHO to remove pedophilia from that list of mental disorders. However, according to EFE, there is no evidence that a social movement of "people attracted to minors" has asked the WHO to normalize pedophilia .


In recent months, the social network Facebook lowered the profiles of pages that identified with the MAP and the MOP. A group of people signed a petition on the change.org platform to request that social network delete these types of profiles.

“Lately in the social network FACEBOOK there have been several pages» MAP »(Minor-Attracted Person) that is to say pages that are asking for the normalization of PEDOFILIA and clearly we all agree that this movement should NOT have the slightest support for Therefore, we ask that Facebook remove all MAP pages from its platform as they try to normalize pedophilia and pedophilia ”, reads the petition.


The WHO "strictly prohibits sexual activity with children (persons under 18 years of age), regardless of the minimum age of free consent or the age at which the majority is reached in the country in question," the organization states in its code of ethics.

The MAP has a colored flag to identify itself. Blue represents boys, pink represents girls; white indicates that their relationship is not impure and yellow, referring to the fact that they are developing people, according to the NGO Common Cause cited by UNO TV.


However, there are organizations like The Global Prevention Project that cares for people with this disorder, which clarify that MAP is the way in which people attracted to minors are named in the research community.

The NGO told EFE that it is not aware of a MAPmovement asking the WHO to remove pedophilia from its list of mental disorders.


The Global Prevention Project is an organization specialized in preventing child abuse through mental health treatments and psychoeducational assistance to people with sexual behaviors that are illegal but have not reached physical contact.

The organization B4U-ACT, specialized in providing psychological assistance to adults and adolescents attracted by minors, told EFE that "there is not a single MAP movement, but rather many."

In Mexico, complaints about crimes of abuse of minors online can be reported to the Public Prosecutor's Office at this link: https://mpvirtual.fgjcdmx.gob.mx/CiberDenuncia/terminosCondiciones.aspx, where they will follow up and provide the necessary attention.
 
If MJ ever actually did rape young boys, why did the entire media go after him, even after a jury acquittal, while Roman Polanski is still celebrated by some people in Hollywood? The defense said they've never seen a case like it before, where the prosecution brought out witnesses, and the Defense were charging them since when they dug a bit into their backgrounds, it turned out they were felons. To me that whole thing as an astroturf. Not only does it draw attention away from their own pedophilia, but they take down a positive black role model. It's just like Cosby.

I mean you can go and take a casual browse of things right now that are ignored. Like Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore that run a childrens charity, going to parties with Epstein, Maxwell and Weinstein. You think that will ever be investigated like MJ was? Or even investigated at all? I doubt it.
View attachment 1581220
Don’t forget

2AF1D46A-060B-4A46-89D3-68A8D47A2FE4.jpeg
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mountain Dew
I've already started warning normie friends about what MAP means since they will be using this phrase in public within the next presidential term. Just because we see it for the bullshit it is doesn't mean others don't, and MAP is enough of a smokescreen to allow some of them to get close to kids.

Just a friendly reminder that MAP is them admitting that they'd diddle kids in their own words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EvaBraunsGhost
Why the attempts at making pedophilia normal anyway?

(besides this being the crazy Clown World of Current Year)
 
Why the attempts at making pedophilia normal anyway?

(besides this being the crazy Clown World of Current Year)

Arguably, and I absolutely cringe to type this, paedophilia has always been normal, even common. Practically every society in the world has held and executed the concept of the child bride or wife or had young boys lingering around they can fuck without impregnating. Fucking hell, read the Quaran to discover the first peodo! Childhood barely existed as a concept until fairly late in human history. Children were, and still are, sent to work and sent off to have sex all over the world.

It's only fairly recently in history and only in some parts of the world that children have been protected from such abhorrence. It seems that they are trying to turn back the clock on many things, and paedophilia is one of them. I mean, are murder and rape going to be legal next?

Legalised protection for children is largely a Western concept/invention, and even in the West it goes on, just hidden. In the Middle East, Yazidi sex slaves (often children) are sold via Whatsapp messages. SE Asia and Russia sell off impoverished children as well as adults for sex tourism. Arabs up North in England were raping white care home girls, but nobody gave a shit coz RACISM trumps RAPE. Sadly the worlds oldest profession also extends to children, when people are desperate, sadistic or both.
 
Last edited:
Came across this on my Google feed today...


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-accuses-asda-selling-kids-22671639

Here is the T-shirt in question:

Screenshot_20200913-023556.png

It's pretty depressing reading the comments honestly - idk if they have been infiltrated by MAP's and nonces but many are the typical 'batting the accusations back at you' types - the kinds that supporters of poor Desmond aim at the concerned - "what kind of sick perverted mind thinks anything is wrong with this? *innocent face* "

Thing is, we know MAP's use these kinds of slogans - we know MAP's are desperately trying to attach to LGB and be legitimised in the same way

Why are none of these people who are saying 'oh they are just harmless Trolls' not asking why the hell Asda think it's in any way appropriate for 1y+ kiddies clothes to be carrying slogans aligned with ANY sexuality at all whether it be straight or gay?
THEY ARE FUCKING CHILDREN

It's times like this I wish I'd never become aware of the pond-slime who want to get their hands on children and yes I get that some people are unaware BUT people are bashing this woman, saying 'I'd put my child in these without a second thought, they are cute and I'm not a paedo' - instead of just getting defensive, can they not just look into what is actually going on and the messages these are potentially (likely) giving out?

Here's an excerpt from the article that says it better than me

"It's scary how many people are not aware that by their children wearing these clothes, it's a sign to a very dark world - it is very worrying.

"The t-shirt says 'everybody is free to love' - that is pretty much a slogan for the 'love has no age' movement and is the message of minor-attracted persons [MAPs], which is another word for peadophiles.

"At the moment there's loads of people coming out as MAPs and they're really trying to attach themselves to the LGBT community - that's why they're using the rainbow colours.

"The LGBTQ community are so against it because no one in their right mind supports paedophilia."

Co-founder of the LGB Alliance Bev Jackson said it was 'unacceptable' that Asda had 'not learnt from its mistakes' after the release of the learning packs bearing the slogan 'love has no age limit' in June.

"It appears that Asda has not learnt its lesson in terms of safeguarding," Bev said.

"When it happened in June, Baroness Nicholson drew attention to the message 'love has no age' in its learning pack that was for children, the CEO Roger Burnley wrote back that he was extremely sorry and he would improve internal procedures so that no such thing ever happened again.

"And now we see something very similar for a T-shirt for ages one to 14 with some cute little figures saying 'everybody is free to love', which is precisely the same kind of message as before.

"I can imagine that the general public might think, naively perhaps, that 'everybody is free to love' is a sweet, innocent message.

"But Roger Burnley will be well aware that this is not the case and that 'love has no age' and 'everybody is free to love' in T-shirts for young children are wildly inappropriate and are associated with slogans favoured by paedophiles.

"It is astonishing that having apologised previously for the last misstep in this direction that it has happened again.

"Asda clearly needs to hire someone that is actually an expert in safeguarding to prevent this kind of thing happening again"
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Troonologist PhD
They’re not wrong, attraction to children is a sexual orientation.

I’d rather have pedophiles be open so that they can get the help that they need. As long as they don’t diddle kids, they should get therapy.

But let’s be real, most don’t want help. They just want to justify ruining the lives of children for their own selfish interests.
 
They’re not wrong, attraction to children is a sexual orientation.

Actually it's not. Say you are interested physically in young girls. Why settle for a young girl, that can get you arrested and put you away for a long time, when you can have an adult, that looks young and dressed in the same style?

135cm.jpg


Surely that would be the solution. But media outlets I've seen, never talk about it ever. It's always comes back to kids. And that doesn't make sense as an orientation. Guys work primarily visually to denote sexual fitness. So the fact someone is an adult but has all the markers of their sexual preference shouldn't be an issue. But it is for pedos. Guys are willing to bang a hot robot girl, but these people still want kids? When there is a perfect visual and legal ideal right there? It's not an orientation.
 
Last edited:
Actually it's not. Say you are interested physically in young girls. Why settle for a young girl, that can get you arrested and put you away for a long time, when you can have an adult, that looks young and dressed in the same style?

View attachment 1592611

Surely that would be the solution. But media outlets I've seen, never talk about it ever. It's always comes back to kids. And that doesn't make sense as an orientation. Guys work primarily visually to denote sexual fitness. So the fact someone is an adult but has all the markers of their sexual preference shouldn't be an issue. But it is for pedos. Guys are willing to bang a hot robot girl, but these people still want kids? When there is a perfect visual and legal ideal right there? It's not an orientation.
From what I've read, a lot of that is down to the absolute power and destruction of innocence - so an adult, however childlike, just wouldn't be the same

Fucked if I know though - I don't pretend to know how nonces minds truly work and I honestly don't think I want to know either
 
Back