At least the first time they did it, it was because the woman who played the Oracle in the first Matrix died in between films.
I've never even heard of Sense8 before, but it looks like you're saying that this is actually *another* time that the creepy troon siblings randomly recast a blacktor with a different blacktor and pretended like nobody would notice the difference or care. (I looked it up, and yes. This does appear to be correct) I'm not surprised though, they all look the same... amirite? >.>
They also recast the pilot of the ... whatever the ship was called between the first two Matrix films, replacing black guys - again, apparently because of money.
Which is funny, since they keep just recasting black actors when they get too 'difficult', yet the casting for diversity was obvious in this one, as was the way they put old black women on a pedestal. Massive mistake to put Jada Pinkett Smith in old person make-up for it, though. The one recasting that would make sense as the character has aged 60 years, and they didn't take it.
Part of the social commentary in this film is how now people want to "stay in their pods" (an actual phrase in the script) and enjoy what the matrix pipes into their brains
I'd say spoilers, but no one cares by this point.
The Matrix was never a trans allegory. The Matrix: Resurrections is actually a great trans allegory, though. Because it's explicitly stated in the film that part of how they get people to stay in the artificial world is to manipulate their emotions so that they won't want to take the red pill and face reality. Which is what troons are: people who claim to feel something so strongly they'll reject all reality - and attempts to convince them otherwise - rather than face the truth.
Makes perfect sense - troons are people pushing everyone to take the blue pill. Not the allegory they'd
want, but right in line with that tweet screenshotted a few pages back about sequels giving people want they 'need'...
The film itself wasn't good. Everything good from the first film was watered down, if not washed out completely; the action was lacklustre, the fight scenes were poorly choreographed and shot, the music was meh, even the aesthetic wasn't quite right. The meta didn't make sense, and the script and plot were very much on a reddit lefty level. It wasn't so much woke as it was lacking any subtlety and nuance.
As pointed out in previous posts, the Analyst being a misogynist was basic bitch level writing - oh, it's not enough the bad guy is bad, we have to make him say unnecessarily sexist things as well so no one accidentally likes him even a little! Fucking with the population of the earth is one thing, but he does it while performing microaggressions against Trinity! And that goes along with having to knock Neo down to raise Trinity up, not killing any of the supporting cast because they all represent some kind of diversity, and even the netspeak that makes the dialogue so painful to start with. It's not pervasive through the film, and not nearly the worst thing about it, but there's just little touches here and there, including calling Trinity's fake husband Chad, that make it feel like someone in the writing process is your stereotypical Twitter Karen who has pronouns in their bio and lives to be outraged about society and the patriarchy. Maybe Lana (I can't remember their old names) wrote a Tumblr script and was toned down by the others, maybe he wanted to write something completely unrelated, I don't know, but it was an undercurrent. Interestingly, because the two bad guys in the film are both played by gay white actors.
I liked Trinity and Neo, but it was never for their love story, so making that the central part of the film was just another mistake for me. It was fine, but making it a world-changing love is even cheesier than telling yet another Chosen One story. But overall the most accurate line in the film is where they say that Warner Bros. is making a sequel and you can either participate and get out of the way. It's a more interesting failure than The Last Jedi, in that it doesn't fail because it's devoted to shitting on what came before, but instead it's almost too reverent to the source material -
all of it, rather than just the bits people liked. The Matrix is very of its time, but at that time it looked amazing, had hints to deeper meanings you could get out of it if you wanted to and/or were stoned, and was a great, fun cinematic experience. For me, the stuff I liked in the sequels was only the stuff in The Matrix (so about half the second film and five minutes of the third), and they Midichlorianed the hell out of those allusions and references to destroy any thought that the Wachowskis had a bigger picture or greater narrative in mind when writing them.
Which is the tl;dr: Really what they needed to do to ape the first one was some cool action, preferably with a special effect executed in a novel or amazing way that made it feel different from other action films. There's none of that. Just a lot of technobabble, some mild Twitter faggotry (and undoubtedly at least one troon in the supporting cast), and wishing that the film was either as good as the first or didn't exist at all.
I've seen very little of people trying to push the troon narrative, but if anyone tries it you can just show them them picture of Lana that's been posted and ask if they support someone who culturally appropriates dreads. Intersectionality is a bitch, troons.