The Mining Pit

[Null]

It also kept going to 1% instead of 0% when I pressed minus, I had to put it to 100% and press plus from there and it worked.

Press F12, go to console. Type this and press enter:
0.7 + 0.1

I'll fix this in a bit. It's just one of the fundamental flaws in JavaScript that I forget about because even PHP can add correctly.

Spoiler

The console outputs "0.7999999999999999". No, really.

 

[Slick Bridges]

Ah. Mine was stuck and after reading this I deleted local storage for this site. Now it's not stuck anymore.

Mine got stuck again as well and deleting this fixed it.

 

[Null]

I added a lazy fix for the activity slider another lazy fix for detecting if the miner has gone phantom.

 

[neger psykolog]

Pretty high, actually.

Most likely it'll mention some sort of 'exception' like previously when you'd try to run Flash etc. i.e. it'd be up to the end user.

 

[AnOminous]

I added a lazy fix for the activity slider another lazy fix for detecting if the miner has gone phantom.

Is there a reason you can't do that circular thing with the Kiwi logo in it? That thing looked awesome.

 

[The I Scream Man]

90% of my CPU goes to this shit every time I leave for work <3

 

[DildoGaggins]

I better get a shit ton of Dindu Nuffin's for doing this shit @Null

 

[Null]

Is there a reason you can't do that circular thing with the Kiwi logo in it? That thing looked awesome.

I have to build it again.

 

[The Kebab and Calculator]

In a spirit of trying to understand a bit more.....

The code number at the top is personal to each member?

Hashe/s is the number of hashes created by me in the current session? Or?

Total is what?

Threads is what (in this context)?

Activity, I get.

 

[JSGOTI]

In a spirit of trying to understand a bit more.....

Code is the instance of the miner, to my understanding.
Hashes/s is the number of hashes you're processing per second(roughly)
Total is the number of hashes you've done this instance(It resets on page refresh that has the instance in it)
Threads i'm assuming is referencing how many CPU threads that its using.

 

[A Hot Potato]

Anyone that doesn't have 8 threads is a nigger.

 

[The Kebab and Calculator]

Anyone that doesn't have 8 threads is a nigger.

We niggers are fast dude, not slow.

 

[Null]

Code is the instance of the miner, to my understanding.
Hashes/s is the number of hashes you're processing per second(roughly)
Total is the number of hashes you've done this instance(It resets on page refresh that has the instance in it)
Threads i'm assuming is referencing how many CPU threads that its using.

Correct.

If you do window.miner.getId(); it'll give you a different UUIDv4 for each tab. If you do window.miner.getActiveId();, it'll give you the same UUIDv4 on every tab.

 

[neger psykolog]

I bought a warehouse filled with chinamen and got a really long power cable which I hooked up to it and so far I'm pretty impressed with the results:

 

[JSGOTI]

I bought a warehouse filled with chinamen and got a really long power cable which I hooked up to it and so far I'm pretty impressed with the results:
View attachment 293088

...what are you running for hardware?!

EDIT: Are you running a Threadripper?

 

[neger psykolog]

...what are you running for hardware?!

dat 1000 dollar cryptoshekel processor. And for what its worth, if the thing is in your budget then its fucking great. Doesn't slow down for shit, even when I'm background mining at ~30% on KF which is phenomenal.

Also if any of you see the amount my processor is putting into this and think its not worth contributing, it is. I'm just fortunate to have an expensive ass processor that I'm willing to use for this, but every bit really really helps and if you can spare and CPU cycles for this cryptoshekel operation then you should.

 

[JSGOTI]

dat 1000 dollar cryptoshekel processor. And for what its worth, if the thing is in your budget then its fucking great. Doesn't slow down for shit, even when I'm background mining at ~30% on KF which is phenomenal.

I am both jealous, and not jealous at the same time, in regards to the threadripper.
Like, that sort of computing is mindblowing, but for what I do with my PC, I just can't justify that sort of power vs price point.
But for those who -need- that sort of processing power, it's a beauty.

 

[neger psykolog]

I am both jealous, and not jealous at the same time, in regards to the threadripper.
Like, that sort of computing is mindblowing, but for what I do with my PC, I just can't justify that sort of power vs price point.
But for those who -need- that sort of processing power, it's a beauty.

I'd seen quite a few people build absolute top of the range PCs at various points for like $5000 USD and upwards and they were never "really, really amazing".
This thing came out along with Intel's i9 range and some pretty crazy ass graphics cards (GTX 1080 and upwards is absolutely groundbreaking compared to anything previous) and I was like "fuck it", so this is my once every half-decade major, major computer buy.

If you depend on your computer to work/make money, then its worth it. Like if you're spending most of your day on your computer, and each thing you have to wait for ends up frustrating you/distracting you from what you're trying to do, then its really worth it.
In just a few months of this "supercomputing at home" concept, you'd likely save what it cost in being able to more efficiently use your computer without having to wait/close stuff you're not actively using.

 

[JSGOTI]

I'd seen quite a few people build absolute top of the range PCs at various points for like $5000 USD and upwards and they were never "really, really amazing".
This thing came out along with Intel's i9 range and some pretty crazy ass graphics cards (GTX 1080 and upwards is absolutely groundbreaking compared to anything previous) and I was like "fuck it", so this is my once every half-decade major, major computer buy.

If you depend on your computer to work/make money, then its worth it. Like if you're spending most of your day on your computer, and each thing you have to wait for ends up frustrating you/distracting you from what you're trying to do, then its really worth it.
In just a few months of this "supercomputing at home" concept, you'd likely save what it cost in being able to more efficiently use your computer without having to wait/close stuff you're not actively using.

Exactly, for those who are in front of a system all day every day and need the computational power for whatever it is that they're doing, from running simulations to all the rest of that more cpu-hungry stuff that people do, it's great.

For me, I work a trade, so this is my machine for vidya and shitting around on the internet, so I don't have the same needs for it.

That said, I'm still eyeing a new vidcard to update from the 980Ti I'm running, as my processor will remain relevant for a while longer(in regards to what I need it for). That'll probably be a tax returns thing this year.

 

[neger psykolog]

Exactly, for those who are in front of a system all day every day and need the computational power for whatever it is that they're doing, from running simulations to all the rest of that more cpu-hungry stuff that people do, it's great.

For me, I work a trade, so this is my machine for vidya and shitting around on the internet, so I don't have the same needs for it.

That said, I'm still eyeing a new vidcard to update from the 980Ti I'm running, as my processor will remain relevant for a while longer(in regards to what I need it for). That'll probably be a tax returns thing this year.

Well that and also when your spidey sense :autism: starts tingling you can fire up like 6000 new browser windows and shitpost to your heart's content with no lag. It's great.