The only political message I have

I find the disscusion of whether Byuu is dead or not irrelevant and a distraction on multiple levels. Does anyone honestly think that if we turned up unshakable proof that he was alive tomorrow that it would ever be mentioned by the news media at all? Do you think it would shake the faith of any leftist reading journalist lies? I can tell you it wouldn't. The narrative is he's dead, and he will remain dead no matter what happens, and trying to say he isn't is a flaccid and ineffective argument.

If he killed himself, so fucking what? No one in his thread or this site as a whole has done anything wrong. Criticism of disgusting, dramatic weirdos is neither a crime nor morally wrong. Neither is making fun of or laughing at said weirdos. The world is not and should not be a permanent daycare where everyone has to be "nice".

There is a reason why freedom of speech was the first and foremost right defined in the Bill of Rights. It's because European nobility silenced speech, often humourous and insulting speech that made fun of them, to control people. Weaponizing self harm is a tactic used by abusive people, and Byuu, like all trannies, was an abusive narcissist who used the threat of killing himself to try to silence and control others. His mental health was not the responsibly of Null, the individual users in his thread, or the site as a whole. The people like this journalist who support the idea that we should not be allowed to speak or face punishment if we do because some unhinged piece of shit might off themselves because they can't handle the fact that not everyone sucks their ass are abusive, no diffrent than the nobility of old, and should be shot in the head and their offices burnt to the ground.
 
I wouldn't blame individual journalists totally for the state of modern journalism. There's much more blame to be had with the institutions that hire these parasites and allow their lies to be published. I believe people have rose-coloured glasses when it comes to what journalism has been historically; despite a few individuals who are interest in telling the truth above all else, most are there to reinforce the narrative for the "public good". Anyone who chooses to tell the truth about Byuu, and therefore align themselves with the people that "killed" him and would totally ostracize themselves from the people they work with. Telling a lie is the path of least resistance for these people, telling the truth amounts to crucifying yourself.
Agreed on the rose-colored glasses bit. I think the internet has allowed their lies to be spread rapidly but it also has allowed for unprecedented levels of genuine fact-checking that were nigh impossible 20+ years ago.
For example, anyone curious about this can read Byuu's thread and the related threads on their own and even ask the alleged murderers things directly. The plebs have direct access to the exact same resources that the author of this article does.

No journo is going to call Byuu a faggot or imply his alleged suicide was tied to his mental illness, meds, or terminally-online lifestyle or even consider this in an article as those are all career-ending views for these people. There's definitely some fuckery afoot to get this place taken down and any article on it is anti-Kiwifarms propaganda, no one gives a shit about Dave Ginder.

I have an elegant solution..
Null needs to fake his death and blame the article.
He needs to blame all of the articles and mention gamergate.
 
What local station? You mean the local news branch of a megacorp news company?

View attachment 2376164

It's propaganda. All of it.
1627153711189.png


world's gayest nigga
 
I know I'm not exactly making any new exciting points here but fuck me: If someone kills themself because someone else told them to do so on the internet, this person would have found a reason regardless. It might just have been the stubbed toe the next morning that does it.

Nevermind that I personally have massive doubts that it was any actual Kiwifarm posters that "harassed him", if anyone did at all. What I could imagine is that some people read the thread and linked it to him together with horrible things like "lmao".

Now rate me late because I just repeated shit that was said here like 20.000 times.
 
Japanese police won’t reveal any personal information, especially information related to a death, unless connected to a major crime. Even then, family permission needs to be given to ID victims. See the recent Samigahara murders. Not all victims were named.

Death certificate information can only be requested by family or next of kin. There are no public obituaries.


Sperg all you want, but the fact of the matter is Japan is very different from western countries with regards to this type of stuff.
To pretend that all of the media's covering this story cannot verify is still retarded.
I don't even think you are comprehending what I'm saying.
The police cannot literally shield the fact that a death occurred from the media, nor would they and if this death is consequential enough to be covered across dozens of media outlets they can easily confirm wether or not the person in question has in fact died.

I'm not asking for some kinda autistic full page obituary write up.
When you die in Japan you don't just dematerialize if you have no family.
 
Woah. This Alia Dastagir woman is truly a horrible person. These journos are so terrible that I almost wouldn't mind if America got taken over by an authoritarian regime as long as it cracked down on these journos. If that was the case I would gladly go to the gulag/concentration camp/rape pit as long as I lived long enough to see them suffer.
Threaten anyone who asks you a question with violence.
Sigma male advice #324
 
Agreed on the rose-colored glasses bit. I think the internet has allowed their lies to be spread rapidly but it also has allowed for unprecedented levels of genuine fact-checking that were nigh impossible 20+ years ago.
For example, anyone curious about this can read Byuu's thread and the related threads on their own and even ask the alleged murderers things directly. The plebs have direct access to the exact same resources that the author of this article does.
The definition of a double edged sword. Plebs have access to unlimited good and bad information, journalists tend to become people who sit on their ass and use the internet instead of talking to flesh and blood people which in turn gives them a warped sense of reality. You have access to find the truth for yourselves but this also has negative effects for social cohension since people will develop different views from different sources. You have free learning resources and even free college courses online, people watch gape-mouthed retards stare into the camera with their dead eyes and yell about pokemon instead. The negative effects of even a benign development of technology are always unpredictable; people probably thought when the internet was invented that we would enter into a new age of enlightment, and in some ways we have but it also has had a profoundly negative effect on society and individuals as a whole.
 
View attachment 2376366
David Kirk Ginder at a cat cafe in Tokyo in 2018. Provided By Wayne Beckett

So now we have @Wayne Beckett running around working with the press to run up hit pieces in reference to Byuu.

And how the fuck did Wayne get that picture, exactly?

So. What are the odds Wayne is Byuu?
Even at 2018 David's eyes had a dead-stare and eye bags darker than my asshole.
Don't tell me it was all kiwifarm's fault when he clearly had problems way bigger than us.
 
On first glance the statement seems sound from Josh, but it is full of holes that I've come to expect from persons who deal with off the wall stuff and who detract generally from regular information.

The idea of total distrust - and that "they all lie" is just the same type of soundboard used by cults to let you know that their information is real, and all else is fake.

The idea that you can get scientists over a period of 200 years to agree on general principles and many things through tireless experimentation and documentation - but that all else who read their work should "not trust it" unless "they can personally verify it" is practically and in all reasonableness, absurd. I'm not going to go out and build by own CERN because Josh says I shouldn't trust it because I can not personally verify it - even if every scientists who has gone to CERN has verified the result.

There is a difference between being skeptical and then just flat out taking a position everything is a lie unless you can verify it is the route of a fool.
 
Back