The Sacred Cow of Homosexuality - lmao i'm gonna get so much shit for this

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

What does this even mean? Where does gay culture come from if not gays? It didn't manifest from the void.

Yeah sure, every random dude who sucked a dick is not directly responsible for gay culture. But collectively every random dude who sucks dick makes gay culture. You cannot wholly decouple the two, especially when speaking on a social level.

I have to agree with the first dude, because sodomites exist in every culture but not every culture has the public, decadent hedonistic death-worshipping mentality of Modern Western sodomites.

Your average manly Greek spornosexual would have absolute contempt for the effeminate American homosexual who has no wife and children, no love for his polis and his people’s traditions, sleeps around instead of commuting to his eromenos, and destroys his body with drugs instead of building it into a powerful war machine at the gymnasium.

Make Homosexuality Great Again


Edit: not the pederasty part
More like sending a Sacred Band of San Francisco to fight the Chinese

 

[Abracadabra]

Isn’t it a little faggy to be too obsessed with faggots? Anyway.

I’m all for making homosexuals as visible as possible in society, whether through legalizing gay marriage or normalizing their participation in broader communities. If all else, this actually discourages the pedophilia and pederasty that can and does arise in the gay community since homosexuals are then scrutinized as much as your neighbors.

Besides, isn’t pedophilia and pederasty instead a major problem when homosexuality is forced to flourish underground? Islamic communities, for instance.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Isn’t it a little faggy to be too obsessed with faggots? Anyway.

I’m all for making homosexuals as visible as possible in society, whether through legalizing gay marriage or normalizing their participation in broader communities. If all else, this actually discourages the pedophilia and pederasty that can and does arise in the gay community since homosexuals are then scrutinized as much as your neighbors.

Besides, isn’t pedophilia and pederasty instead a major problem when homosexuality is forced to flourish underground? Islamic communities, for instance.

There are two kinds of Far Right
Homosexuals
Closeted homosexuals

 

[DenseDeerFather]

Oh hey look. A thread about the gays

Personally I'm completely indifferent to them. I look at homosexuality the same way, I look at heterosexuality. Usually boring and mundane.

Most gays, I've met irl are boring normal people.

With that said. Holy shit internet gayness just seems to be the hub for really annoying stuff like the twink stereotypes getting fetishized (thanks, James Charles), horny furries and annoying gender confused teenage girls/male feminists who call themselves Trans.

It kinda bleeds into gay this and gay that as if being gay is some sort of cult.

While I'm at it, fuck pride month and pride parades.

I feel like a lot of this hurts the boring normie fags, quiet as they are.

Besides. it's the enbies that get my piss boiling. Fuck that shit too BTW

 

[Jetpack Himmler]

While I'm at it, fuck pride month and pride parades.

Pride Month is a completely hollow and meaningless "holiday" when you look past the rainbow corporate logos. As commercialized as Christmas, Easter, and Halloween are, Pride takes it to a much higher level where the corporations use the LGBT community as a shield from criticism of their shitty dealings (muh ESG score) and push their useless merchandise. It's amazing to witness how many of theses idiots fail to realize that they are being exploited.

 

[Bum Driller]

And you can make the calls that "SJWs" don't count as homosexuals because...?

Because absolute majority of SJW's are totally heterosexual people. It's the main reason why the movement is so strong; ideologically it attracts lots of young heterosexual women, and young heterosexual women attract young heterosexual men in turn. In contrast, alt-right and other right-wing movements don't attract lots of young heterosexual women, and thus they aren't so popular overall because it's women who attract men. Thus, your average right-wing party/group/whatever is a sausage fest filled with boomers, fatsos and the most unmanly of "men", and a handful of fat and/or ugly bee-queens.

Oy vey don't use morals as the basis of the argument! Well how can you have a problem with trannies or anything else then lol? If you're going to say "hurr no morals allowed?" You are sitting here pushing for your own view of morality yet respond with "don't use morals" if someone disagrees with you. Peak subversion. This is exactly how this ideology operates, oy vey don't force your morals on me goyim! Don't you know morals are bad! You're not allowed to have those, good people don't have moral judgments about things! Meanwhile you sit here passing moral judgment about faggotry and trying to tell other people that faggotry is good.

Morals has nothing do with why I support gays, but don't support the current transmania. I know some gay people IRL, and they are all completely decent and nice people. Trans people on the other hand are almost always batshit-insane. I don't want the society to bow to delusions of batshit-insane people, and I couldn't care less what other people want to fuck, as long as everything happens between consenting adults.

Some more reasons why "muh closed door" is a retarded line.

1. Quick thought experiment, you can pick one of two communities to live in. Community A is 100% faggots. You and your wife might be straight but literally every other person your children interacts with will be a faggot. All of the other children in this community (let's assume somehow there is a normal amount of children, it's a hypothetical) are being raised by faggots and taught that it's normal to have 2 dads. Nothing illegal ever happens and your kids don't ever have to actually see the ass sex, so it's all muh closed doors, but it's still 100% fags. Community B is 100% heteros and bans faggotry.

Which one do you want to raise your kids in? Do you think they will be more likely to become fags themselves if they grew up in one community vs the other? Any honest and sane person will pick Community B. The retort is likely to be "but nowhere is 100% gay in real life!!!1" Yes and thank goodness for that. The point is that the more faggotry you have around, the more risk you're putting your kids at, and the ideal is zero risk. Learn how the Amish eliminate sodomy with this one weird trick, faggots hate them! Of course, the other retort is to pretend that faggotry is somehow normal and wouldn't represent a negative outcome for your child. If you believe that you're probably a moral relativist/general shitlib and hopeless.

2. Let's extend "muh closed doors" to some other types of behavior besides only sodomy. Propaganda has successfully convinced most people that it is fine and normal to commit sodomy "behind closed doors," but if we broaden this out for 2 seconds, it becomes immediately apparent that "it's behind closed doors" isn't a viable defense for degeneracy and no one actually thinks it is if they are being honest. Let us suppose there is a couple who likes to get pregnant, abort the kid late-term, have the husband rape the dead fetus, then cook and consume the remains. They find this dead cummy baby ritual sexually satisfying and do it over and over again.

It's technically legal, no one is getting hurt by any direct violence, it's all behind muh closed doors, but they aren't ashamed of it either and consider it totally fine and normal to do. You will not want to associate with these people, you will try to avoid them and you won't want to let your kids be around them. Same deal for degenerates who fap to loli art and are out and proud about it. And anyone who claims they would ackchyually be okay being around such people are either liars or wild degenerates themselves. It's not that the heckin' closed doors somehow made something okay, it's just that the line for what is acceptable and what is considered degenerate has been arbitrarily (yet successfully, from a social standpoint) moved forward to put sodomy on the other side of it.

You must be one of the most violently closeted homosexuals I've ever come across. Nothing else than utter self-hatred explains this vitriol.

Appealing to the behavior of animals is also a silly argument. I agree that appeals to muh normality are not good arguments. In this case I was just pointing out that, given that such an appeal had been made, ass sex is not a normal behavior anyways. In the sense that the average person does not engage in it.

"Heterosexual anal intercourse (HAI) is not an uncommon behavior with 36% of women and 44% of men 25–44 years old in the United States reporting ever having HAI in their lifetime (1). There is evidence that the prevalence of HAI may be increasing in recent years, which may be due to a true increase in the behavior over time or heterosexuals becoming more comfortable reporting the behavior"

So, in essence you're incorrect. Average people do engage in ass sex.

 

[Narcotics]

For me, there's 2 types, there's the homosexuals, then there's the faggots.
The homo is a normal, average person that happens to be attracted to people of their same sex, they go on with their lives, they don't make being homo their only notable aspect of their personality, maybe they're into weird fetish shit, but they keep it to themselves and adults only. A normal person with a different sex preference than usual.
Then there's the faggot, the faggot needs to let everyone know they're faggots, they have to let you know how faggy they are all the time, they may be obnoxious, irritating, insufferable, but at the top of all, and most importantly, they're faggots, you have to be careful with what you say around the faggot, for you may say something the faggot finds offensive and then you'll be shit on by the faggot and the rest of their faggot friends and orbiters. The faggot openly admits being into weird shit with no kind of shame, in fact, they look to spread their degeneracy to others.

Then there's the trannies, enbies, and whatever made up shit white women made up to pretend feeling special.

 

[DenseDeerFather]

Pride Month is a completely hollow and meaningless "holiday" when you look past the rainbow corporate logos. As commercialized as Christmas, Easter, and Halloween are, Pride takes it to a much higher level where the corporations use the LGBT community as a shield from criticism of their shitty dealings (muh ESG score) and push their useless merchandise. It's amazing to witness how many of theses idiots fail to realize that they are being exploited.

It's high key hypocritical when they act like they see through it but then screech "UwU pride" or "Trans visibility day"

It's virtue signaling bullshit and people tend to be continually obnoxious about it. And it fucks over the boring normal gays.

 

[gang weeder]

Morals has nothing do with why I support gays, but don't support the current transmania. I know some gay people IRL, and they are all completely decent and nice people. Trans people on the other hand are almost always batshit-insane. I don't want the society to bow to delusions of batshit-insane people, and I couldn't care less what other people want to fuck, as long as everything happens between consenting adults.

And how exactly do you know fags are "decent and nice" without referencing morals? Kek.

You must be one of the most violently closeted homosexuals I've ever come across. Nothing else than utter self-hatred explains this vitriol.

"Heterosexual anal intercourse (HAI) is not an uncommon behavior with 36% of women and 44% of men 25–44 years old in the United States reporting ever having HAI in their lifetime (1). There is evidence that the prevalence of HAI may be increasing in recent years, which may be due to a true increase in the behavior over time or heterosexuals becoming more comfortable reporting the behavior"

So, in essence you're incorrect. Average people do engage in ass sex.

Wild degeneracy and porn obsession has caused people to normalize anal sex far more than in the past, that is true. Good point.

 

[Marley Rathbone]

No one needs to needs to justify being ant-gay agenda because of religion, or even logic.

Gaydom is simply disgusting, and that is all the justification necessary.

 

[Wormy]

Gaydom is simply disgusting, and that is all the justification necessary.

I find brussel sprouts disgusting too, but do you see me campaigning to have eating them punished by law?

 

[teriyakiburns]

I find brussel sprouts disgusting too, but do you see me campaigning to have eating them punished by law?

I'd support that campaign. Tiny, degenerate cabbages should be purged from the earth.

 

[Marley Rathbone]

I find brussel sprouts disgusting too, but do you see me campaigning to have eating them punished by law?

 

[Wormy]

View attachment 3385597

Well then, this has given me something to think about...

 

[Alex Hogendorp]

I find brussel sprouts disgusting too, but do you see me campaigning to have eating them punished by law?

Is it okay if I rally for the banning of Wasabi?

But really, there's probably a cult that outlaws the consumption of Brussel sprouts like how Muslim countries ban the consumption of pork and alcohol.

 

[Ser Prize]

With all the recent revelations about what the "LGBT" have been up to I revive this. Have any of you had your mind changed? When will it be enough?

 

[Rainbow Child]

To answer the question originally posed, simply, because they're hypocrites.

They refuse to recognise that "kissing boys" is something that girls do and that "wearing dresses" is also something that girls do. How one can point to the speck in the tranny's eye of mincing about in a frock without looking at the plank in one's own eye of taking it up the ass is completely beyond logical justification and is motivated soley by a desire to keep doing the cross-sexed behaviour that one likes even if there's other cross-sexed behaviours one doesn't like.

All these LGB's trying now to drop the T are trying to distance themselves from the shitstorm they've antagonised for the past century, finding themselves a scapegoat in the trannies to take all the blame.

What a absurd fucking claim. Are you aware homosexuality correlates highly with certain genotypes and hormones levels in utero?

You might be an automaton programmed by your genes and your hormones, but I am a rational human being who can discern between good and bad, true and false, beautiful and ugly.

What more tangible argument is there then scientific fucking data?

Morality. Aesthetics. Theology.
The Wisdom of Repugnance.

I thought right-wingers were supposed to be individualists instead of collectivists

This is a thought common today but completely ahistorical. In Royal France, where the monarchists (conservatives) sat on the right wing of parliament and the republicans (liberals) sat on the left wing of parliament, and thus where the terms "left wing" and "right wing" originated, there it was the left wing advocating for liberty of the individual and the right wing advocating for preservation of the traditions (read: robust adaptations to harsh Darwinian selection pressures) of the community. Only over a few generations of progressive individualisation, as the demos have been weaponised by the media moguls who manipulate them with promises of indulgence and hedonistic pleasure, and especially since the rivalry between the big two Allied Powers (USA and USSR) after those wars that ravaged the monarchies, has the idea of "individualism" become "right wing". It's slightly amusing to see Yankees calling their "right wing" party the capital-R Republicans. Vive le Roy

Didn't jump-start it here. The struggle for gay "rights" was already a thing in the UK before stonewall. The organisation was more than happy to come along and claim credit for it afterwards, while inserting a bunch of tranny and not-so-subtle paedophile propaganda into everything, but we owe nothing to it.

The fact that you think a British organisation that named itself after a famous Yankee riot is the famous Yankee riot is so cute.

 

[Secret Messages]

When someone gay says “I am sexually attracted to the same sex.” You can’t really argue them on that point. You’re not CEO of what makes their dick hard. On the other hand “I am a woman.” lol.

 

[AbyssGazer]

Homos often want us to accept what shouldn't be accepted (open fetishist degeneracy, kids with homosexual adoptive parents, etc). Trannies go one step further though as they want us to deny objective reality in order to please their fetish. This denial of objective truth hurts society on a more profound level that's harder to fix later. Then there's the gross self harm involved on which I hardly need to elaborate.

Homosexuality should be accepted but not encouraged. Fetishist degeneracy in general and troonery in particular should not be accepted at all.

 

[Whatevermancer]

This is a thought common today but completely ahistorical. In Royal France, where the monarchists (conservatives) sat on the right wing of parliament and the republicans (liberals) sat on the left wing of parliament, and thus where the terms "left wing" and "right wing" originated, there it was the left wing advocating for liberty of the individual and the right wing advocating for preservation of the traditions (read: robust adaptations to harsh Darwinian selection pressures) of the community. Only over a few generations of progressive individualisation, as the demos have been weaponised by the media moguls who manipulate them with promises of indulgence and hedonistic pleasure, and especially since the rivalry between the big two Allied Powers (USA and USSR) after those wars that ravaged the monarchies, has the idea of "individualism" become "right wing". It's slightly amusing to see Yankees calling their "right wing" party the capital-R Republicans. Vive le Roy

Why did French kings dress up like flamboyant fruit cakes?