Inactive The SJWiki

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is one of the comics linked in their article on the Gender Binary. While not directly related to the wiki I have to post it because it's just so fucking weird and a perfect example of their kind of thinking. Link


This actually gave me a good laugh, god, do they really think anyone like that guy exists in real life?

http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Hacked_celebrity_photos#.VZrSECFViko

"Hacked celebrity photos are (often nude) private intimate photographs of women celebrities" and then it goes on to say "While men can be included in such leaks, they are seen as "collateral damage"."

So if I jack off to Jennifer Lawrence's nudes that's misogyny, but jacking off to Bradley Cooper's nudes is ok? Thanks for the info sjwiki :heart-full:
 
This actually gave me a good laugh, god, do they really think anyone like that guy exists in real life?

This is how SJWs see all heterosexual white males. BUT THEY'RE TOTALLY NOT RACIST OR SEXIST YOU GUYS!!!

On a different note, check out this genderbread person. I dare you to find a better way to draw a gender neutral depiction of a human.

genderbread.png


In another part of the article they complain that "gender expression" only encompasses clothing on the diagram when the genderbread person clearly is not wearing clothes and the dotted line showing gender expression emphasizes the entire body. These people will never be happy.
 
Last edited:
They have an entire article on why tv tropes is triggering and oppressive, and no article on racism.

Seems about right for SJWs
That pretty much sums up their priorities. Who cares that women have basically no rights in the Middle East? Or that you can be executed for being gay in some parts of Africa? After all, someone said something they didn't like on the internet! And their favorite cartoons don't have enough trans characters! Clearly those issues are more important.*sigh*
 
Was the term SJW coined from this wiki? I think that it was a coincidence that Social, Justice and Wiki happened to make SJW, so people on the other side decided to call the posters of this wiki Social Justice Warriors, hence the acronym. Seems too good to be true almost.
 
http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Neurosexism
I wasn't going to read this. I just looked at this line and went 'holy shit'.
ewa99DJ.png

Cites 26 references? Must be legit.
A recurring name is Cordelia Fine. The word neurosexism seems to be hers. I'm not going to pretend I know anything about her work, or that I'm a neuroscientist. From some Googling she calls herself a feminist and appears to write pieces for the layman about studies she doesn't like the methods of.
One is the description of a speaking event from last year that has no link to a transcript or video of the event, but you can still buy tickets.
A number of the articles make no reference to gender and are very general. The Popular Science one is on-topic but really poorly researched.

The actual article is painfully unscientific. I expected a little more after digging through all that. I guess linking to things kind of related are good enough when making something intended to be used for reference. What the fuck is a 'kyriarchical compromise'?
 
Last edited:
In the Assigned Male thread, @Jaimas claimed Laurelai runs SRS (ShitRedditSays). This is not true, as she was banned from reddit several months ago. I bet she started this wiki as a replacement hugbox.

She wasn't banned from Reddit, she ragequit from there. For the 821904th time.

And no, SJWiki wasn't her replacement hugbox; it was Twitter and (surprise) Tumblr. She then tried to make RationalWiki her replacement hugbox, but the clique she was a member of weren't welcomed there because they were tremendous drama queens. After that, she founded SJWiki.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back