Inactive The SJWiki

Status
Not open for further replies.
This wiki violates me as a transgendered Latino.
I want threads in spanish so I can be accustomed to my mother tongue and not this colonial imperial language of opression.
I DEMAND IT TO BE CHANGED YOU RACIST SHIT LORDS!
NOW NOW NOW!
 
  • Feels
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
Reactions: DirkBloodStormKing, Remilia, Splendid and 5 others
I like how on the "Cis" page references a source that states the term has no academic use. The blog even states this fact, though this isn't surprising. It is funy said source claims anyone who wants plain English is constraining the discussion about how great they are.

http://juliaserano.livejournal.com/14700.html

It was nice that the author listed that first in the "Critiques" section.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Jaimas
  • Like
Reactions: APerson, Jaimas and Johnny Bravo
lolwut said:
http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Free_speech_argument#.VZt8GflwuYE

Just as we say "muh soggy knees," they say "freeze peach."

:story:
Click to expand...
They even fail at that. Wow. DON'T DISTURB THE ECHO CHAMBER!!111oneone1!!one!1
I like how their first source is an SJW source, which in turn does not state any sources whatsoever.
And that source includes this:
Making_History_pink-300x246.png

If you say so.
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Like
Reactions: Pointless Pedant, DirkBloodStormKing, bloodcoffee and 4 others
One Retarded Image said:
Making_History_pink-300x246.png
Click to expand...

Yes, you are making history. Because you're fucking stupid.

You're making history because you're the reason that what happened to Digg is about to happen to Reddit. You're making history as the reason Gamergate won, as being the reason that the entire internet views your culture as the most clear and present danger to its existence, and as being representative of why the fucking Tumblr board on the Farms even exists.

You've made history because you're proud to be stupid.

For me, it's the fact that even the best articles you have barely have any credible citations for your arguments. As an example, in the "Freeze Peach" article noble @lolwut mentioned, you have all of two citations. One of these citations - a college professor - states therein that people in his classes are not allowed to argue with empirical evidence - I.E. the exact opposite point the article is trying to make.

The other is the very article the image macro above comes from.

But let's keep going. Articles like "Check your privilege" have no citations whatsoever, and you guys have articles which essentially aim at establishing that anyone attempting to establish the primacy of the scientific method and that filthy "peer review" thing is guilty of scientism, and that we shouldn't be able to use such things as empirical data to come to conclusions. Something that your own wiki fucking espouses.

You guys are making history because you're the biggest group of proud-to-be-brainwashed dolts the internet has ever encountered.

We will be richer for your collective loss.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Pointless Pedant, DirkBloodStormKing, bloodcoffee and 13 others
I find it quite interesting that they have articles on all sorts of completely off the wall topics, but haven't even made a page about the most basic things, like Lesbians. I noticed the Tucute page is also a red link. Come on guys, we know you love talking about how great you are. I wanna see the Tucute page.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DirkBloodStormKing
Yaks said:
I find it quite interesting that they have articles on all sorts of completely off the wall topics, but haven't even made a page about the most basic things, like Lesbians. I noticed the Tucute page is also a red link. Come on guys, we know you love talking about how great you are. I wanna see the Tucute page.
Click to expand...

Andrew Dobson would be most disappointed...
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: DirkBloodStormKing, Meowthkip, FemaleGoodra and 2 others
autisticdragonkin said:
Well I actually may be getting an account but you essentially need to send in a resume and your life story while requesting an account
Click to expand...

Hm, well if we had a kiwifarms article, it would probably lead back her to what you're saying... unless you only wanted a short-term account but that seems like a bit of a ripoff if you need a life story...
 
Orthodox Chrischanity said:
I wanted to zoom in on the axes picture from the Kyriarchy article, and this was right underneath.

View attachment 36193

While I'm sure some companies out there will be satisfied with the "lower resolution" argument, I just get a giggle out of that rationalization.
Click to expand...
Eh, that's pretty much abridged standard Wikipedia fair use policy, except that Wikipedian fair use has 8 criteria explained over many pages. This apparently only has that template and a link to the Wikipedia article (not policy, article). There's no page for missing licenses, implying that nobody is checking, and a copyright complaint could get the whole wiki shut down.
 
Jaimas said:
Yes, you are making history. Because you're fucking stupid.

You're making history because you're the reason that what happened to Digg is about to happen to Reddit. You're making history as the reason Gamergate won, as being the reason that the entire internet views your culture as the most clear and present danger to its existence, and as being representative of why the fucking Tumblr board on the Farms even exists.

You've made history because you're proud to be stupid.

For me, it's the fact that even the best articles you have barely have any credible citations for your arguments. As an example, in the "Freeze Peach" article noble @lolwut mentioned, you have all of two citations. One of these citations - a college professor - states therein that people in his classes are not allowed to argue with empirical evidence - I.E. the exact opposite point the article is trying to make.

The other is the very article the image macro above comes from.

But let's keep going. Articles like "Check your privilege" have no citations whatsoever, and you guys have articles which essentially aim at establishing that anyone attempting to establish the primacy of the scientific method and that filthy "peer review" thing is guilty of scientism, and that we shouldn't be able to use such things as empirical data to come to conclusions. Something that your own wiki fucking espouses.

You guys are making history because you're the biggest group of proud-to-be-brainwashed dolts the internet has ever encountered.

We will be richer for your collective loss.
Click to expand...

These people are the worst. Everything I see from them just serves to make us dumber as a society. They kill everything they touch and are just useless in every conceivable capacity.

Too many of them are mirror reflections of ADF and his asspatting compatriots. You summed it up so perfectly. They lack any single thread of useful knowledge and just tell people to "check their privilege" or some other form of SJWspeak when challenged. They cannot craft useful policy or form arguments with any semblance of original thought. Everything with them is about "oppression" and how they need to prove they are right not by fact but by how oppressed they are. Facts and concepts do not matter to them. It is just anger and resentment.

Mosquitoes have more value to the world than these people. At least Mosquitoes can be eaten by other animals.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pointless Pedant, DirkBloodStormKing, bloodcoffee and 4 others
Baby Pom said:
They even fail at that. Wow. DON'T DISTURB THE ECHO CHAMBER!!111oneone1!!one!1
I like how their first source is an SJW source, which in turn does not state any sources whatsoever.
And that source includes this:
Making_History_pink-300x246.png

If you say so.
Click to expand...

Moar like becoming history. As in, you know, not existing any more.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Pointless Pedant, Omegamage and Jaimas
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back