The Skeptic Community - Pseudo-intellectuals ranting on Youtube

[deconstruction burger]

The Skeptic Community are basically modern Foucaults

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Harmful got kicked out of his parents house by force due to being a fuckin' nutter.

He describes that they instantly kicked him out, wouldn't let him finish collecting his things before leaving, closed a door on his foot and shoved him to the ground. What the fuck actually happened? They also want him to get a schizophrenia diagnoses, wtf?

 

[Lilac]

Sorry, but how old is he already?

 

[KillThemCrackasBabies]

Sorry, but how old is he already?

I think KiA said 30, and he might have said it in the video before it was removed. Well into adulthood though.

 

[averagejane]

Theryn Meyer is also thinks not wanting to date troons = phobia. He is such an entitled assole.

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheTherynMeyer/status/966460170371973120



It doesn't matter how much troons try to sugarcoat their bullshit. It always boils down to: Not dating troons = transphobia.

i don't think she ever really said that it was transphobia tho? or am I reading wrong?
"Might your preference be motivated by transphobia? Maybe I guess, but innocent until proven guilty. So I'm gonna assume it's not."
and in the twitter thread she also said
"And maybe a lot of cis lesbians have felt like the worst has been assumed of them by a vocal minority of trans ppl online. I know that feeling, and it feels terrible."
and she goes on to say blah blah "All trans women as a whole are asking for is that if you don't wanna date us, don't be an asshole about it, just be respectful, and don't use the opportunity to imply that we're men."
she didn't say at all that it's transphobic not to want to date them. just that people assume the worst of people on both sides, trans or cis lesbians.
i think theryn just wants to give people the benefit of the doubt, these days.

 

[LN 910]

Weird how these MRA-lites and their fans always paint women with the same brush feminists paint men with.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

i don't think she ever really said that it was transphobia tho? or am I reading wrong?
"Might your preference be motivated by transphobia? Maybe I guess, but innocent until proven guilty. So I'm gonna assume it's not."

Thus HE implies that not being attracted to troons is transphobia. Also this MAN doesn't get that sexual orientation =/= preference. Homos being attracted to the same sex is not a preference. Preferences can change. Sexual orientation does not.

Not being attracted to troons is because of orientation.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Thus HE implies that not being attracted to troons is transphobia. Also this MAN doesn't get that sexual orientation =/= preference. Homos being attracted to the same sex is not a preference. Preferences can change. Sexual orientation does not.

Not being attracted to troons is because of orientation.

And if it is a preference, people are allowed to have preferences. It's your right to be as selective as you want about who you date.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I think KiA said 30, and he might have said it in the video before it was removed. Well into adulthood though.

The reason he stuck around with his family was because his mom needed help with his even more mentally handicapped sister.

 

[KillThemCrackasBabies]

The reason he stuck around with his family was because his mom needed help with his even more mentally handicapped sister.

Is her vag a tard factory or something? The fuck's going on with them...

 

[KillThemCrackasBabies]

I'm not sure if there's a dedicated Bloodsports General or what but Repzion is/was a "skeptic" at one point so this goes here;

Laughed.

 

[:thinking:]

I'm not sure if there's a dedicated Bloodsports General or what but Repzion is/was a "skeptic" at one point so this goes here;

Laughed.

Try here, my knick-knock.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/internet-bloodsports.39538/

 

[CrazyHair]

I can't believe people are calling them the bad guys when this chick just would leave after being told repeatedly.

Found her channel https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCKf79-EDXJvmEWUEeLifwtw

Believe what you want, but remember Occam's razor. My official statement is in the About section https://robbinsn.wixsite.com/crayzeehair

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

Believe what you want, but remember Occam's razor. My official statement is in the About section https://robbinsn.wixsite.com/crayzeehair

Hi Crazyhair, welcome to the farms and enjoy your stay. May I ask how you came across the farms?

 

[Chemical snorfare]

remember when spam on forums, was people trying to sell you double glazing and sheds?

I'm going back a long way here.

 

[sperginity]

Harmful got kicked out of his parents house by force due to being a fuckin' nutter.


Reupped, though the quality is quite shit.

He's gotta troon out and take up space at a women's shelter asap, like trail blazing skeptic Danielle muscato did when he got the boot from his parents basement

 

[GS 281]

Believe what you want, but remember Occam's razor. My official statement is in the About section https://robbinsn.wixsite.com/crayzeehair

Hey friend, I am threadbanning you until you prove you are who you say you are. This doesn't take much, just post something like "hi kf" on social media someplace and link it to us. After we see it, you can delete it. This is done as a precaution to prevent people from posing as you.

 

[IAmNotAlpharius]

A big problem with the idea of a skeptic community is that they have no connecting identity beyond the vaguest notion of "anti-SJW" and even that's debatable. Any attempt to try and make a coherent group out these people, like Sargon seems to want, is idiotic. They're basically turn into the next wave of feminists constantly eating their own at the slighest hint of dissent.

The drama around Laci Green is a good sign of this happening. You've got quite a few people white knighting her against anyone who is a little bit skeptical of her motivation. The Thunderfoot drama is kind of this too, but Thunderfoot actually is kind of a disingenuous cunt.

It could be possible, but ideologically they need something more substantial to unite themselves around than just opposing another group. Groups that are dedicated against other groups very easily devolve into circle jerking and group-think. Anti-groups also become toxic easily as their core emotion is disdain or dislike of something, so they'll start tearing each other apart if that's all there is to their foundation. Plus, if their whole thing is we're against SJWs, then they depend on the existence of SJWs for their recruitment, retention, and expansion as a movement.

Also, imo the cntrl left have peaked and are slowly becoming irrelevant. GamerGate was the start of it, but Kingdom Come Deliverance, Far Cry 5, the Bully Hunter failure, their decreasing ability to influence even TV and movies, and openly being kicked by left wing figures are all cracks in the wall of internet social vigilantism. So, the liberalist movement is less appealing today then it would've been two years ago and will be less appealing two years from now unless they expand their ideological foundation.

Thus HE implies that not being attracted to troons is transphobia. Also this MAN doesn't get that sexual orientation =/= preference. Homos being attracted to the same sex is not a preference. Preferences can change. Sexual orientation does not.

Not being attracted to troons is because of orientation.

Your comment reminded me of an article that a neuroscientist who studies sex and gender wrote -one Debra W. Soh from York University in Toronto- rebuking the idea that men and women are identical blank slates and hence not liking transwoman is transphobic. Which doesn't make any sense since there are lesbians who aren't interested in penises and gay men who are. It's kinda ridiculous that people believe this.

Spoiler: article on gender and science

Are gender feminists and transgender activists undermining science?
https://archive.is/vwufL
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-soh-trans-feminism-anti-science-20170210-story.html

Her article points out that there are neurological differences between men and women. Apparently, the study a lot of radical feminists refer to when they state that male and female brains can't be distinguished by scientists, used too small of a sample size and was done poorly. She also states that "gender identity is fixed, but only in adults" and that most trans kids and teens will desist from being trans: Most will later identify as gay men, although few will become hetero.

Spoiler: Rhetorical Differences Between Debra and the Skeptics

*Edit*
Also, one should pay attention to the tone difference between the Professor and the skeptics. The author is better at writing persuasively than the skeptics. She acknowledges the intent of many feminists and herself is a feminist that believes in equality. Debra also doesn't belittle or mock the pro-trans leftists. This improves the trust one has in the author and makes one more willing to listen.

In contrast, Sargon is good at appealing to emotion when it comes to people who agree with him, but it's also off-putting to those who don't. This makes it more difficult for him to convert others unless they were almost agreeing with him to begin with.

Spoiler: Edit: Sources from the article

The author cites herself a few times which is a bit weird, but then again it's her area of study and this is not a scientific journal article. I'm adding these because they deal with social justice and those who disagree with them, I'm currently working, so I'll be updating these periodically, but eventually I'll add all her sources.

Notable and Quotable: Quotes From Trans Children author reveals she had gender dysphoria and is doubtful of the claims of the transtrenders.
https://archive.is/zVAyh
https://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-transgender-children-1441406728

How testosterone affects the brain:
https://archive.is/emnZ1
https://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-transgender-children-1441406728


Study cited by feminists on brains:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/www.pnas.org/content/113/14/E1965.full.pdf


Study author cites:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/www.pnas.org/content/113/14/E1968.full.pdf


Study about mental tasks that both sexes generally do better in:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-005-0118-7


Transitioning can be beneficial for adults with dysphoria:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03625.x/abstract


Author had dysphoria in her youth:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/https://...able-quotable-transgender-children-1441406728


Huffington Post Calls Desistence a Myth:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/www.huff...hill/the-end-of-the-desistance_b_8903690.html


Her Thesis; 88% of the boys in the cohort they followed desisted, most later identified as gay men, some identified as straight:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/https://...07/34926/1/Singh_Devita_201211_PhD_Thesis.pdf


In another smaller study, half of trans teens desisted:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-011-9752-2


Her Twitter account:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/https://twitter.com/debra_soh


I'm assuming she's not a sceptic.

 

[Particle Bored]

It could be possible, but ideologically they need something more substantial to unite themselves around than just opposing another group. Groups that are dedicated against other groups very easily devolve into circle jerking and group-think. Anti-groups also become toxic easily as their core emotion is disdain or dislike of something, so they'll start tearing each other apart if that's all there is to their foundation. Plus, if their whole thing is we're against SJWs, then they depend on the existence of SJWs for their recruitment, retention, and expansion as a movement.

Also, imo the cntrl left have peaked and are slowly becoming irrelevant. GamerGate was the start of it, but Kingdom Come Deliverance, Far Cry 5, the Bully Hunter failure, their decreasing ability to influence even TV and movies, and openly being kicked by left wing figures are all cracks in the wall of internet social vigilantism. So, the liberalist movement is less appealing today then it would've been two years ago and will be less appealing two years from now unless they expand their ideological foundation.



Your comment reminded me of an article that a neuroscientist who studies sex and gender wrote -one Debra W. Soh from York University in Toronto- rebuking the idea that men and women are identical blank slates and hence not liking transwoman is transphobic. Which doesn't make any sense since there are lesbians who aren't interested in penises and gay men who are. It's kinda ridiculous that people believe this.

Spoiler: article on gender and science

Are gender feminists and transgender activists undermining science?
https://archive.is/vwufL
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-soh-trans-feminism-anti-science-20170210-story.html

Her article points out that there are neurological differences between men and women. Apparently, the study a lot of radical feminists refer to when they state that male and female brains can't be distinguished by scientists, used too small of a sample size and was done poorly. She also states that "gender identity is fixed, but only in adults" and that most trans kids and teens will desist from being trans: Most will later identify as gay men, although few will become hetero.

Spoiler: Rhetorical Differences Between Debra and the Skeptics

*Edit*
Also, one should pay attention to the tone difference between the Professor and the skeptics. The author is better at writing persuasively than the skeptics. She acknowledges the intent of many feminists and herself is a feminist that believes in equality. Debra also doesn't belittle or mock the pro-trans leftists. This improves the trust one has in the author and makes one more willing to listen.

In contrast, Sargon is good at appealing to emotion when it comes to people who agree with him, but it's also off-putting to those who don't. This makes it more difficult for him to convert others unless they were almost agreeing with him to begin with.

Spoiler: Edit: Sources from the article

The author cites herself a few times which is a bit weird, but then again it's her area of study and this is not a scientific journal article. I'm adding these because they deal with social justice and those who disagree with them, I'm currently working, so I'll be updating these periodically, but eventually I'll add all her sources.

Notable and Quotable: Quotes From Trans Children author reveals she had gender dysphoria and is doubtful of the claims of the transtrenders.
https://archive.is/zVAyh
https://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-transgender-children-1441406728

How testosterone affects the brain:
https://archive.is/emnZ1
https://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-transgender-children-1441406728


Study cited by feminists on brains:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/www.pnas.org/content/113/14/E1965.full.pdf


Study author cites:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/www.pnas.org/content/113/14/E1968.full.pdf


Study about mental tasks that both sexes generally do better in:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-005-0118-7


Transitioning can be beneficial for adults with dysphoria:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03625.x/abstract


Author had dysphoria in her youth:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/https://...able-quotable-transgender-children-1441406728


Huffington Post Calls Desistence a Myth:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/www.huff...hill/the-end-of-the-desistance_b_8903690.html


Her Thesis; 88% of the boys in the cohort they followed desisted, most later identified as gay men, some identified as straight:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/https://...07/34926/1/Singh_Devita_201211_PhD_Thesis.pdf


In another smaller study, half of trans teens desisted:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-011-9752-2


Her Twitter account:

https://archive.is/o/vwufL/https://twitter.com/debra_soh


I'm assuming she's not a sceptic.

As an off topic aside, Soh did an entertaining 7-part interview with comedy channel We The Internet. Here’s part 1:

 

[IAmNotAlpharius]

As an off topic aside, Soh did an entertaining 7-part interview with comedy channel We The Internet. Here’s part 1:

Love it. Especially the 'who does autism better' bit at the end.

It's my fault for taking it off subject. I meant to emphasize how the skeptics don't use rhetoric as well as the author, so this ticks people off resulting in the anti-anti-SJWs.