- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
I sure hope they get an Apollo 8 style Earth rise video. I suppose they'll have to relay them down over time out there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I sure hope they get an Apollo 8 style Earth rise video. I suppose they'll have to relay them down over time out there.
They are using an infrared laser for high-speed data connections, basically fiber optic without the fiber. It's called the O2O which can support speeds of around 250 megabits per second. It beams back to the ISS to the Illuma-T, which connects to a ground link satellite called the TBIRD which can do an impressive 200 gigabit per second ground uplink.I sure hope they get an Apollo 8 style Earth rise video. I suppose they'll have to relay them down over time out there.
I am pretty sure almost all Apollo vids we see except for very few were film recordings that were developed later on Earth. It's still weird that the original Apollo 11 landing live feed is 'lost footage' and all we have now is a recoding off a TV camera that was live feeding from the surface.They are using an infrared laser for high-speed data connections, basically fiber optic without the fiber. It's called the O2O which can support speeds of around 250 megabits per second. It beams back to the ISS to the Illuma-T, which connects to a ground link satellite called the TBIRD which can do an impressive 200 gigabit per second ground uplink.
This means unlike Apollo and whatever RF broadcast it was able to do, they can transfer 4k videos and pictures with very little issue and enable ground crews to start tearing into the fresh data in almost realtime. It's mind boggling to me that they have enough accuracy to track the ISS as it orbits, aim a low-spread laser at it while also travelling at lunar insertion velocities, and still transfer data faster than some people's primary home internet speed.
I look forward to this coming out someday just so I can know exactly how it's possible to fuck up 'bolt four RL10s to a big tank and an RCS or something' in the 2010s-2020s.Berger could probably cite exactly what the issue was if he had true insider knowledge or insight
I read the forum like circa-2010. That was kinda fun, old Shuttle project guys talking about retarded interagency politics and how cool projects got killed. Saw they had a youtube, went 'wow, wonder what this is like' and then I was left wondering what the fuck happened.NASASpaceFlight just plain old sucks and any industry insiders left ages ago.
That's called the 'Overview effect'I just wonder how the astronauts' perspectives about life will change as they get to the moon. Being an astronaut already makes you "different" due to the extensive training both physically and mentally, but seeing the terrestrial landscape (near) up-close and personal in a way that hasn't been seen in over 50 years has to be humbling.
Legit. That line of thinking is what separates the black people from the niggers, and one is an endangered species.BTW, the black guy up there said to someone asking about this 'first black' crap and said hopefully someday we'll get past even asking that crap. Major props to that.
"Hey guys, what's going on in this capsule?"
I cannot support this, it is such a flagrant abuse of free speech. He should have said "fuck off niggers"Funny, they're trying say say the kid said 'fricking'. That was a 'fuckin' if I ever heard one, but now he's famous.
View attachment 8800399
I actually really wish he ended it with 'you retard' to CNN. Trump probably would've invited him on AF1 for thatI cannot support this, it is such a flagrant abuse of free speech. He should have said "fuck off niggers"
I'm not sure if it's even possible to take direct iphone pics and send them for now. I mean we've seen them in cabin with the phones and it would be nice to get the raw images.Not to degrade the scope and importance of this mission, but any pictures you see are more filtered than an OF whore.
That's why the live feed is so important, even if it is 144p potato quality.
Eh, that's true but it's also true for basically any space photography. All the cool photos we see of stuff like nebulae are composite images where they assign certain colors to certain wavelengths of light, including ones not visible to humans, so we can see the full scope of the dust cloud. Hubble was the "see what the human eye can see" telescope but even Hubble had some infrared and ultraviolet sensors that are outside of human vision.Not to degrade the scope and importance of this mission, but any pictures you see are more filtered than an OF whore.
That's why the live feed is so important, even if it is 144p potato quality.
I wish one of the astros snuck a Samsung phone onboard so they can take a photo of the dark side of the moon only for Samsung to superimpose their fake "HD" moon on itThe live feed is exactly what i expected. a very bright white dot.
And yes, if we want to see pretty pictures of nebula 1000s of light years away, we obviously would need a simulation. This is our neighbour, a minute or two away, we can and should get HD.