US "The Squad" Megathread - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib Derangement Syndrome

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I honestly only know about American politics from what I read on the Internet but since we all love shitting on leftists I figured we'd get a kick out of this. Also it's trending on Twitter so you know it's important.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...irect=on&noredirect=on&utm_term=.960552c9ba53

NEW YORK — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old political novice running on a low budget and an unabashedly liberal platform, upset longtime U.S. Rep. Joseph Crowley on Tuesday in the Democratic congressional primary in New York.

The surprise victory by the community organizer in a district that includes parts of the Bronx and Queens came after an energetic, grassroots campaign that mustered more than enough support in a low-turnout race that many had expected to be an easy win for Crowley, a member of the Democratic House leadership.

“The community is ready for a movement of economic and social justice. That is what we tried to deliver,” said Ocasio-Cortez, who has never held elected office and whose candidacy attracted only modest media attention.

She told The Associated Press after her victory that she didn’t have enough money to do polling in the race, but felt in her gut that her message had a chance to connect.

“I live in this community. I organized in this community. I felt the absence of the incumbent. I knew he didn’t have a strong presence,” she said.

Crowley has been in Congress since 1999 and hadn’t faced an opponent in a primary election since 2004, when Ocasio-Cortez was just a teenager. He was considered a candidate to become the next House speaker if Democrats win the majority.

“It’s not about me,” Crowley, 56, told his supporters at a campaign party following his loss. “It’s about America. I want nothing but the best for Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. I want her to be victorious.”

He later played guitar with a band at the election night gathering, and dedicated the first song, Bruce Springsteen’s “Born to Run,” to Ocasio-Cortez.

Crowley represents New York’s 14th Congressional District, where he is also the leader of the Queens Democratic party.

Ocasio-Cortez was outspent by an 18-1 margin during her race but won the endorsement of some influential groups on the party’s far left, including MoveOn, as well as the actress Cynthia Nixon, who is running for governor. She defeated Crowley by 15 percentage points.

Born in the Bronx to a mother from Puerto Rico and a father who died in 2008, Ocasio-Cortez said she decided to challenge Crowley to push a more progressive stance on economic and other issues.

She attended Boston University, where she earned degrees in economics and international relations, and also spent time working in the office of the late U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.

After graduating, she returned to the Bronx where she became a community organizer. In the 2016 presidential campaign she worked for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Among her issues is expanding the Medicare program to people of all ages and abolishing Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. She recently went to Tornillo, Texas, to protest against policies that have separated parents from their children at the southern U.S. border.

Ocasio-Cortez gained some internet attention for a campaign video called “The Courage to Change,” a two-minute spot for which she wrote the script and featured footage from her own home.

Crowley is chair of the House Democratic Caucus, the fourth-highest ranking position in Democratic leadership in that chamber of Congress.

His loss drew the attention of President Donald Trump.

“Wow! Big Trump Hater Congressman Joe Crowley, who many expected was going to take Nancy Pelosi’s place, just LOST his primary election. In other words, he’s out! That is a big one that nobody saw happening. Perhaps he should have been nicer, and more respectful, to his President!” he tweeted.

The Republican candidate for the office, Anthony Pappas, is running unopposed and had no primary. Pappas teaches economics at St. John’s University.

She was a Bernie campaigner, is supported by BLM, and wants to abolish Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Also this was in a solid-blue Congressional District so you know she's a shoo-in for next Congress.

But hey, we did get to see Trump laugh at Crowley on Twitter.
 
It explicitly calls for banning airplanes and farting cows. Jesus Christ ... I think we can safely call this one a "dud."

The highly criticized draft does. The "proper" one doesn't; however, it's still an incredibly badly written piece of legislation.
 
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/27/alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-rise-leaves-14th-congres/
AOC's rise to stardom leaves constituents in the dust: 'You worked in a bar. You are not a princess'

NEW YORK — Some voters who launched Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to political stardom say she has left her constituents in the dust.

At Ricky’s Cafe, a diner across the street from Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s newly opened district office in Jackson Heights, staff and customers said their congresswoman lost touch with them since she went to Capitol Hill less than three months ago.

“I see her on TV a lot but not in the neighborhood,” said waitress Barbara Nosel, 55. “You are supposed to come to the people without the media. You are one of us. You worked in a bar. You are not a princess.”

Although voters perceive a distance between themselves and their representative in Congress, they said they were not giving up on Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and could vote for her re-election in 2020.

She has just over a year and a half to prove herself.

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s performance so far as a freshman congresswoman received mixed reviews in the 14th Congressional District, which includes parts of the Bronx and Queens.

They also ran a different type of picture.
710458


I know I'm the only one thinking about the pictures they use but with stock photo sites there's a huge amount of available material from every event. I just took a look at Alamy, Reuters and Shutterstock and there's a lot of pictures where - wait what is this

Nueva York, Estados Unidos. 17th July, 2018. Mayor of Barcelona, Ada Colau (R) participates along with candidate for congresswoman for the Democratic Party Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (L) in an event organized by Democracy Now in the auditorium of the University of New York, New York, USA, 16 July 2018. Colau and the new promise of the American left, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, debated today how the alternative left can stop the feet to the extreme right in the Trump era.

710464

Why did she meet with a foreign official that's from a Spanish social justice party prior to the election to discuss how to run American politics and deal with the Trump era and why can't I find anything in the news about it? Hm. Shouldn't foreign officials stay out of American elections and isn't that split loyalty or whatever she and/or Omar called it?
I'm not good at searching so don't take my word for it, but the strange thing is that "alexandria ocasio-cortez Ada Colau" and clicking on the news tab should yield something, but no.
 
Trump rally’s “AOC sucks” chant is the latest dangerous MAGA provocation
The crowd at Donald Trump’s latest campaign rally took up a new chant directed at one of the Democratic party’s most visible new members of Congress, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

“AOC sucks, AOC sucks,” the throng in Grand Rapids, Michigan bellowed last night (March 28 ), after Donald Trump Jr., mentioned the New York City representative’s Green New Deal climate change bill. Later on social media, far-right pundits gleefully shared clips.

Hating on Ocasio-Cortez has become reliable right-wing clickbait. She’s replaced Hillary Clinton and even House speaker Nancy Pelosi as a favorite target.

As her questioning of witnesses at congressional hearings wins more praise from Democrats and progressives for, say, examining the American politics’ reliance on dark money, the hate is becoming uglier, more misogynistic—and more threatening.

The Daily Caller published a fake “nude selfie” that purported to show Ocasio-Cortez, members of right-wing groups pretending to be journalists sometimes roam the halls of Congress to film “gotcha” videos of her refusing to answer provocative questions, and her Republican peers have called her everything from “little girl” to stupid.

Trump himself has made a practice of denigrating women during his public life. He insulted Republican primary opponent Carly Fiorina’s looks, bragged about sexually assaulting women, and was accused of assaultby multiple women. Since he became president, women of color have been a particular target, and he has repeatedly badmouthed black women, including congresswomen and the widow of a slain soldier.

The real-world effect
Prosecutions for death threats against US politicians spiked in 2018, as Quartz recently wrote. In general, about 75% of those charged for making threats against US politicians have come from the ideological right, based on analysis of cases going back to 1990 by the Prosecution Project. They are almost entirely US citizens, male, and roughly 85% white, and their targets are mostly Democrats.

Trump’s nasty personal attacks on his political opponents seem to carry particular weight. Since he took office in 2017, four white men have been convicted of threatening to kill Maxine Waters, the California congresswoman Trump has singled out repeatedly, calling her “Low IQ.” Men who called themselves Trump supporters or shared his anti-immigrant views have sent bombs to his political opponents and have killed worshippers at a synagogue. Since Trump was elected, law-enforcement officials have been “extraordinarily concerned that—based on the polarization and hostile nature of our political discourse—we would see an increase in people carrying out acts of violence,” a terrorism expert told Quartz in October.

Like father, like son
At he Michigan rally, Trump’s eldest son seemed to delight in the crowd response. “Now, you guys aren’t very nice,” Donald Jr. said, smiling, as the AOC chant rang out.

Polls show Ocasio-Cortez is most popular among women, and potential voters aged 18 to 34. According to a recent Quinnipiac poll, 27% of the women surveyed and 35% of those 18 to 34 say the have a “favorable” opinion of her. (Both overall and in those categories, more respondents said they didn’t know enough about Ocasio-Cortez to judge her.)

White men don’t like AOC most of all, with 51% of the group saying they have an “unfavorable” opinion of her. Some behavioral experts have said they believe that is mostly because these men are afraid of her.

“She doesn’t just challenge the patriarchy, she’s challenging the race, class, and gender hierarchies all at once, as well as the capitalist system that requires member of Congress be wealthy before they get there,” says Caroline Heldman, a gender and politics professor at Occidental College, who was quoted in a recent Huffington Post column examining why conservative men hate her so much.

Let's see what the braintrust at /r/politics has to say about the article. They've got to be paid to post this. People can't really believe this, can they?

710456


710462


Only two types of Trump supporters!
710463


710465


710466


Oopsie, page_one lets the mask slip a little for a second:
710469


I had to stop reading at this point, the irony is too much:
710471
 
Trump rally’s “AOC sucks” chant is the latest dangerous MAGA provocation


Let's see what the braintrust at /r/politics has to say about the article. They've got to be paid to post this. People can't really believe this, can they?

View attachment 710456

View attachment 710462

Only two types of Trump supporters!
View attachment 710463

View attachment 710465

View attachment 710466

Oopsie, page_one lets the mask slip a little for a second:
View attachment 710469

I had to stop reading at this point, the irony is too much:
View attachment 710471

Yeah, she has the potential and the drive to go places. The problem is that she's low on the pecking order and really bad at picking the right people to be around her. Until she ditches the "queen bitch" attitude and the retarded people that wanted to include shit like banning airlines in her Green New Deal she's going to be silently politically killed by her own party, because the old guard doesn't play nice.
 
All these people who said Trump wasn't qualified to be President want to vote for a woman who literally thinks the three branches of government are "the Presidency, the House, and the Senate".
 
Trump rally’s “AOC sucks” chant is the latest dangerous MAGA provocation


Let's see what the braintrust at /r/politics has to say about the article. They've got to be paid to post this. People can't really believe this, can they?

View attachment 710456

View attachment 710462

Only two types of Trump supporters!
View attachment 710463

View attachment 710465

View attachment 710466

Oopsie, page_one lets the mask slip a little for a second:
View attachment 710469

I had to stop reading at this point, the irony is too much:
View attachment 710471
1. She's always been out of touch, I mean after all she's a socialist they're all out of touch. (Music related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u02tycroA30)

2. Reddit is a circlejerking shithole, what else is new?
 
Eh? Does it really?
It's the Daily Fail, so take it for what it's worth, but yes, it does.

The fact that both politifact and factcheck.org are running interference insisting "no, no, that's not what it says!" should be another indicator of how insane it actually is (they're splitting hairs claiming that the plan's intention of eliminating air travel by replacing it with high speed trains doesn't technically constitute a "ban").
 
It's the Daily Fail, so take it for what it's worth, but yes, it does.

The fact that both politifact and factcheck.org are running interference insisting "no, no, that's not what it says!" should be another indicator of how insane it actually is (they're splitting hairs claiming that the plan's intention of eliminating air travel by replacing it with high speed trains doesn't technically constitute a "ban").
Seems like it would be smarter to incentivize farmers and consumers to turn onto other less intensive livestock than outright ban cattle. Also you could negate a huge chunk of the emissions related to our agriculture system by encouraging more local growing and sourcing of food crops and less dependent on the in-time logistics system (Which is also murder on our roads incidentally)

I think there is an agreeable green infrastructure bill somewhere in that outline with enough revision, but yeah you wont get there by trying to force the change in such a hamfisted fashion.
 
Neither version of the Green New Deal (initial draft or final resolution) has the word "nuclear" once. It's retarded.

Anyone who claims to be concerned about atmospheric pollution from human activity - including, but not limited to, anthropocentric climate change - but isn't pushing for construction of more nuclear power plants is either totally uninformed or totally full of shit. Either way you can safely ignore them.
 
Neither version of the Green New Deal (initial draft or final resolution) has the word "nuclear" once. It's exceptional.

Anyone who claims to be concerned about atmospheric pollution from human activity - including, but not limited to, anthropocentric climate change - but isn't pushing for construction of more nuclear power plants is either totally uninformed or totally full of shit. Either way you can safely ignore them.

And then you have Germany...which is actively deactivating and dismantling all of its nuclear power plants...to be environmentalist or something. I'm surprised the Green New Deal didn't call for the same thing.
 
Build so many nuclear reactors that we can just synthesize hydrocarbon fuels for our vehicles from the air, desalinate salt water, absorb and sequester CO2, and grow crops in LED lit automated hydroponic farms. Reduce all environmental issues to energy issues, then throw as much nuclear energy as needed to solve the problem.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Germany’s emissions actually increase once they started shutting down their nuclear plants? Mainly because of the current state of renewables, which still require coal and fossil fuels to make up for deficits caused by sheer unreliability.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Germany’s emissions actually increase once they started shutting down their nuclear plants? Mainly because of the current state of renewables, which still require coal and other fossil fuels to make up for deficits caused by sheer unreliability.

Yeah, but the green movement is the biggest example of "feels before reals" that there is. They don't want to actually be environmentally sound, they want to feel like they're being environmentally sound. And nuclear is just so scary and icky... haven't you ever seen the Simpsons?
 
Neither version of the Green New Deal (initial draft or final resolution) has the word "nuclear" once. It's exceptional.

Anyone who claims to be concerned about atmospheric pollution from human activity - including, but not limited to, anthropocentric climate change - but isn't pushing for construction of more nuclear power plants is either totally uninformed or totally full of shit. Either way you can safely ignore them.
You'll get many answers from the green brigades on this, ranging from 'but muh Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile' and 'nuclear reactors are just literal bombs waiting to go off' to 'nuclear is bad because it works too well and won't allow our luxury green communism delusions to become a reality.' and they're all retarded.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Germany’s emissions actually increase once they started shutting down their nuclear plants? Mainly because of the current state of renewables, which still require coal and fossil fuels to make up for deficits caused by sheer unreliability.
Turns out when you need to get power and you shut down zero-emissions power generation.. you get more emissions.
 
Stop corn subsidies, farm subsidies, any subsidies. There's a lot government can do to make things better but that doesn't look good to low information voters.
Plus on a purely moral basis it makes Trump (rightfully) look like a big hypocrite when saying America would always win if only other_country would use fair trade practices. I happen to believe that's probably true the majority of the time but when it comes to agriculture we're not remotely practicing what we preach, so we can't say for sure we've found out.
 
Back
Top Bottom