The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, we already have google trying to bring floyd back as an ai, we just need to crossexamine an animal for this to be a regular AA case
Why would they need to bring him back as an AI don't they know a handful of douchetubers have already summoned Saint Floyd from the dead on their iPhones at 3am....granted the only words he would say were "I can't breef" and *assorted chimp sounds* but it's possible to bring him back from the grave.
 
LMFAO we're seeing the beginning of a BLM 4D chess narrative
In fairness, rackets was pretty surprised to learn some of the things that the defense got admitted as evidence.

I'd be inclined to believe this is less a case of 4D chess and more a game the prosecutors being overconfident in their case going in to the trial though.
 
Failure to prepare witnesses and refusal to research basic drug info are part of the state’s 4D chess calculus. Good to know.
In fairness, rackets was pretty surprised to learn some of the things that the defense got admitted as evidence.

I'd be inclined to believe this is less a case of 4D chess and more a game the prosecutors being overconfident in their case going in to the trial though.
Direct consequence of falling for your own koolaid
 
Failure to prepare witnesses and refusal to research basic drug info are part of the state’s 4D chess calculus. Good to know.
Ah, but they're doing it on purpose because they want Chauvin to walk. It maintains the narrative of the irredeemably racist system conspiring at the highest levels to literally murder BIPOCs and is a lot easier than forcing yourself to admit that maybe they have no case and maybe you spent the better part of a year rioting and virtue signalling for a junkie who most likely died by misadventure.
 
Nobody's coming to kill the jury and the new york times isn't stalking them or breaking any laws by publishing publicly available information from the jury selection process you fucking schizoids.
Literally everything the nogs have done in the past year makes you wrong.
 
Nobody's coming to kill the jury and the new york times isn't stalking them or breaking any laws by publishing publicly available information from the jury selection process you fucking schizoids.
Considering what we've witnessed in the last year and the prevalence of "cancel culture" or whatever fancy name it has today, I don't know if you can say this with a straight face. The NYT article has a pretty clear undertone of "here's the jury and here's some info about them just in case."
 
Every cult has true believers.

There are still people who were in the Manson family, Peoples Temple, Heaven's Gate, Waco, all that shit wandering the streets today. The deaths and/or incarcerations of the leaders did not end the movements. I think the Manson prosecutor still has personal security.

Look at all the shit Scientology does to harass perceived enemies.

If you don't think some BLM whackadoodle could come popping out of the woodwork in 5 years seeking revenge for St. George, you're naive, frond.
Yeah, people don't seem to really understand that this is a blasphemy trial dressed up as a murder trial. Hard left activists and their media enablers have built a cult around intersectionality and the Floyd Myth is too useful to their cause to let it die. It doesn't matter how much evidence you show these people, they're just going to believe it's all a white supremacist conspiracy.
 
IDK if it's me, but there is nothing "horrifying" about that video. There are more gut wrenching scenes in fiction now. Then there is what you said. Every time you watch you pick up new shit that the msm tells you to ignore.

Have to thank Martin's mother and Rachael Jeantal for that. Mother looked like she couldn't give a shit her boy was dead and Rachel...well, she's a meme and a reference point for bad witnesses for a reason.
A guy like you wouldn't have stopped for a dying black man. So let's not keep your standard of empathy as the benchmark
 
Considering what we've witnessed in the last year and the prevalence of "cancel culture" or whatever fancy name it has today, I don't know if you can say this with a straight face. The NYT article has a pretty clear undertone of "here's the jury and here's some info about them just in case."
“See also: 5 gruesome ways that people guilty of high treason were put to death throughout history and how to carry out each in detail. You won’t believe the video guide on the Death of a Million Cuts! Order the correct cutlery from Amazon at this link.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back