The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Twitter isn't the entire internet

Urban cities aren't the entire United States, despite what CNN wants you to think.
Okay so because big things that prove my point didn't happen across literally every square mile of America you felt the need to jump in with this. I get that in your world Boise, Idaho blowing up is somehow the exact same as New York City blowing up, but in the real world we can notice patterns and ascertain conclusions from them.
 
"I called my mum while it was happening..."

"AY YO MOM, DIS FUCKING CRACKHEAD NIGGA GETTING HIS NECK LIT THE FUCK UP, YA, YA IMMA RECORDZ IT FOR YA, WE CAN ALL HAVE A GUD FUCKIN LAUGH"

"Yea I uh, deleted it out of uh.....respect yea, respect."

OH god oh fuck here come the true and honest water works oh boy
 
I have known a fairly broad cross-section of people ranging from based as fuck to woke as fuck and nearly all of them think Twitter is a dumping ground for emotionally unhinged degenerate failures. Taking the opinions of Twitter as reality is like listening to someone on Kiwi Farms: retarded.
Unfortunately, corporate America builds their brands around feedback from those same failures who do nothing all day except sperg out on Twitter.

Stupid people in small groups are just as dangerous as stupid people in small groups, just in a different way.
 
The policy was likely about cashiers getting their friends to come in and use fake bills and being sure they would look the other way. It's a way safer way to steal and not look suspicious on cameras, and nobody can easily tell who would have done it during a shift.
To the average citizen this would not occur to them, but if you live in the hood they had to make a whole new rule about it, like how you'll see fried chicken places with bulletproof glass. It's a giant headache to do, that means there must be a reason.
 
Taking the opinions of Twitter as reality is like listening to someone on Kiwi Farms: retarded.
1616391768384.png
 
So this is the thread that has finally pulled me out of lurking because despite y'all's colourful language, this is actually the most rational discussion I've found regarding this trial. God help us all.

Prosecution have fucked up big-time with this, I assume because they were banking on riding the coattails of Chauvin's Trial by Media all the way to a full set of guilty verdicts. Their narrative is confused at best, and their witnesses are low-calibre and mostly detrimental so far. Defense are going to have an easy time establishing reasonable doubt, and rightly so.

Chauvin acted like a twat, but his restraint was comfortably within the official MPD use-of-force framework. He did not break the law, because being an asshole is not a crime. And unfortunately for BLM, uniformed knee-jerk public opinion does not form the basis of the legal system.

Honestly, the SJWs should be satisfied that this absolute farce of a trial may act as a catalyst for revision of restraint guidelines, because that would at least potentially save a few lives down the line if speedballing and consequently being a volatile criminal idiot becomes trendy. But they won't be; they are baying for blood having jumped on the virtue-signalling hype train without ever stopping to look at the evidence in the case they are apparently so invested in. Fucking lunacy.

I agree with all of that, but I do think we might see the opposite of Jury Nullification. They'll go into that delibration room, know he didn't break the law, but know they need to find him guilty of "something" to "make up for slavery" or "because they'll fucking find us and kill us" and they'll find SOEMTHING to nail him on.
 
Okay so because big things that prove my point didn't happen across literally every square mile of America you felt the need to jump in with this. I get that in your world Boise, Idaho blowing up is somehow the exact same as New York City blowing up, but in the real world we can notice patterns and ascertain conclusions from them.

20% of Americans use twitter, only 10% of them make up 80% of their tweets.

Your "big points" are literally only happening in liberal strongholds, nowhere else in the US.

Learn to properly analyze data, retard.
 
The world is a better place without Floyd. What a piece of shit.
It's hard to disagree. I don't how any group on Twitter can defend this guy:

Commies - Dude is a violent felon who robs preg women and legit did a side job helping out feds rat out people. Never did labor and would plague the working class.
Blacks - Dude rat out other niggas to the feds and was going around your hood dropping fake cash and tweaking out everywhere. He never did shit for black people or his family.
Trannies - Floyd prob would call your programming socks faggy and make fun of you nonstop calling you a cum sucking queer.
Whites and any other ethnicity - lol nigger
 
That's also like saying "only 0.01% of people in America are TV anchors." Yeah, we know. It's still broadcast, setting narratives, and controlling agendas.
I don't understand why people don't get this: they are not the consensus, they are the ones who set the consensus.
 
Prosecution have fucked up big-time with this, I assume because they were banking on riding the coattails of Chauvin's Trial by Media all the way to a full set of guilty verdicts. Their narrative is confused at best, and their witnesses are low-calibre and mostly detrimental so far. Defense are going to have an easy time establishing reasonable doubt, and rightly so.
This is some weird strategy by the prosecution.
They're making this place look as rough as humanly possible. The manager has a pistol so it's clearly a shady part of town. The witness called George Floyd "big" which kinda throws out the idea of "big black man theory" the news has been pushing to paint Chauvin as racist. Floyd is clearly not in his right mind with his banana phone.
ABC (they make good devil's advocates) tried their best to spin in a positive light by pointing out that Floyd could AT LEAST hold up a conversation... kinda. This is before the defense even steps in. I thought they had a solid case but this is fucking parody.
 
The policy was likely about cashiers getting their friends to come in and use fake bills and being sure they would look the other way. It's a way safer way to steal and not look suspicious on cameras, and nobody can easily tell who would have done it during a shift.
To the average citizen this would not occur to them, but if you live in the hood they had to make a whole new rule about it, like how you'll see fried chicken places with bulletproof glass. It's a giant headache to do, that means there must be a reason.
It's also a great incentive to get employees to treat the store's money as if it were their own.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back