The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I miss it when @AnOminous was the only legal mind here, this new crop are angry spergs.
I can already imagine the hell your teachers, assuming you had any, had to live through.

-Rekki, tell me, what does 6 times 8 equal to?
-Uuh...42!
-No, that's wrong.
-You mad!? Just fucking chill, dude, what is your problem!? Stop being such a sperg!
 
I can already imagine the hell your teachers, assuming you had any, had to live through.

-Rekki, tell me, what does 6 times 8 equal to?
-Uuh...42!
-No, that's wrong.
-You mad!? Just fucking chill, dude, what is your problem!? Stop being such a sperg!
Imagine being the type of person that is literally just picking a gay fight in this thread.
 
I miss it when @AnOminous was the only legal mind here, this new crop are angry spergs.


Look, think of it this way: Murder 2 is intentional murder that wasn’t pre-planned. There doesn’t need to be a motive, but there has to be intent, *in that moment* when you did it.

Murder 3 is when you are deliberately trying to commit a felony such as an armed robbery but your gun goes off by accident and someone dies. You didn’t intend to kill them, beforehand or at the time, but if you weren’t there robbing that bank, they’d be alive.

Neither needs a motive. In fact, sometimes a really good motive can reduce your charge to manslaughter.
 
If you want to quickly and concisely explain to someone how Wikipedia is biased, have them search 3 things:
  • Proud Boys
  • Antifa
  • Black Lives Matter
The bias is clearly evident within the first few sentences of the Proud Boys article vs. the other two. Any rational, open-minded person would agree that the description of the Proud Boys is unfavorable and negative when compared to the description of Antifa and BLM, but Antifa and BLM have been engaged in far more violence and destruction than the Proud Boys.

I don’t care for any of these groups, but this is a perfect example of why I don’t trust Wikipedia. This is why I especially don’t trust their take on something as high profile as this trial.

View attachment 2066707
View attachment 2066709
View attachment 2066710
Man, that's some old bullshit.

1617803984826.png
 
Murder 3 is when you are deliberately trying to commit a felony such as an armed robbery but your gun goes off by accident and someone dies. You didn’t intend to kill them, beforehand or at the time, but if you weren’t there robbing that bank, they’d be alive.
Well, ackchyually, that specific example would be a felony murder in most places and count as a first-degree murder but that's kind of an exception.
 
Look, think of it this way: Murder 2 is intentional murder that wasn’t pre-planned. There doesn’t need to be a motive, but there has to be intent, *in that moment* when you did it.

Murder 3 is when you are deliberately trying to commit a felony such as an armed robbery but your gun goes off by accident and someone dies. You didn’t intend to kill them, beforehand or at the time, but if you weren’t there robbing that bank, they’d be alive.

Neither needs a motive. In fact, sometimes a really good motive can reduce your charge to manslaughter.
Typically Murder 3 is actually the same thing as manslaughter, idk what the fuck is up with minnesota, but 'murder 3' as your describe it is whats known as 'felony murder' elsewhere in the US, which is that someone died while you were committing a felony.
 
Typically Murder 3 is actually the same thing as manslaughter, idk what the fuck is up with minnesota, but 'murder 3' as your describe it is whats known as 'felony murder' elsewhere in the US, which is that someone died while you were committing a felony.

True. It’s a bit painful how every place apparently describes the different “crimes resulting in death” so differently when they could be harmonised. Although, the point of my post was to show @Rekkington the difference between motive and intent. I doubt he’ll listen though.
 
Oh man no wonder our "bro" here was so angry watching Floyd pop his last pill, the guy's an absolute manlet. Short people and their anger management problems.

My ex-boyfriend worked for a property management company whose security department hired black panther manlet. He lasted a month before punching someone unprovoked and being immediately fired. I have begged my ex for this video footage (he has it), but he won’t budge. This was months before the Floyd incident.
 
True. It’s a bit painful how every place apparently describes the different “crimes resulting in death” so differently when they could be harmonised. Although, the point of my post was to show @Rekkington the difference between motive and intent. I doubt he’ll listen though.
I already got it, I was making a point about people being angry spergs, stop dragging this out and patting yourself on the back like you're Michio Kaku giving a quirky anecdote explaining string theory.
 
Why the fuck are all these people testifying that tazing or pepper spraying Floyd would have been AOK while pinning him is way outside the pale?

For someone experiencing heart or breathing problems, either of those certainly would have sent him to the great beyond.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back