The TRUE and HONEST reason for the Diversity Effort in America - M. Rasheed knows

[Iwasamwillbe]

Masterminds of the Diversity Effort

Click for Artist's Description CITATION Rasheed, Muhammad. "Masterminds of the Diversity Effort." Cartoon. The Official Website of Ca...

www.mrasheed.com

So according to black Muslim ADOS activist kang cartoonist Muhammad Rasheed, this entire Diversity Effort is just a scam formed by the White Man to avoid giving blacks reparations and "economic inclusion".

Do you guys think this is accurate at all?

 

[The Fool]

This is hardly a deep thought. The diversity thing is just democrafts importing voters, there's nothing that complex about it.

 

[SmileyTimeDayCare]

No, it is a scam by Soros to nuke the US economy so he can make more billions. This guy needs to decrypt better.

 

[HarveyMCR]

“Economically including” that is the strangest non-statement I’ve ever heard. What does it even mean?

 

[Flake452]

There is no one reason for mass immigration. Lots of different groups want it for different things, Big business for cheap labour and new customers, government to prop up its pyramid pension scheme, socialists because they know non whites are more likely to accept socialism, and non whites who want increase their vote share to counter white interests and advance their own.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

“Economically including” that is the strangest non-statement I’ve ever heard. What does it even mean?

According to this paper:

Economic inclusion refers to equality of opportunity for all members of society to participate in the economic life of their country as employers, entrepreneurs, consumers, and citizens.

Basically, what Rasheed is saying is that whites need to end whatever form of systemic racism has been made against blacks to lower their opportunities for economic success.

 

[TFT-A9]

Does anyone else see the irony in a Muslim bitching about reparations for slavery? Is that just me?

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

Does anyone else see the irony in a Muslim bitching about reparations for slavery? Is that just me?

What are your talking about? Islam is the TRUE and HONEST original religion of the African man, and Muslims never did nuffin wrong to Africans whatsoever.

 

[Terrorist]

Integration was an effort to undermine whites, not minorities. Of course, NOI style black nationalists who wanted racial separation and self-sufficiency would be a threat to that, which is why (((they))) targeted and demonized them in the history books in between all the MLK propaganda.

 

[Arctic Fox]

According to this paper:

Basically, what Rasheed is saying is that whites need to end whatever form of systemic racism has been made against blacks to lower their opportunities for economic success.

So the plantation style welfare programs?

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

When affirmative action was started, nearly every black person in the US was the descendant of slaves. Now many of the recipients of affirmative action policies are the children of wealthy African immigrants, the ones whose great-great-great grandparents were selling the slaves. When you see a story like 'Black teen gets into all Harvard, Yale, and Princeton', look at the name--it's almost always Ghanaian or Nigerian. Data on the financial well being of black people in the US gets a lot worse when you take out the immigrants. I more or less agree with him.

 

[Randall Fragg]

I love watching the Horseshoe Effect in action.

 

[crocodilian]

This is hardly a deep thought. The diversity thing is just democrafts importing voters, there's nothing that complex about it.

Voters and debtors*.

When affirmative action was started, nearly every black person in the US was the descendant of slaves. Now many of the recipients of affirmative action policies are the children of wealthy African immigrants, the ones whose great-great-great grandparents were selling the slaves. When you see a story like 'Black teen gets into all Harvard, Yale, and Princeton', look at the name--it's almost always Ghanaian or Nigerian. Data on the financial well being of black people in the US gets a lot worse when you take out the immigrants. I more or less agree with him.

Reparations are an inherently flawed concept. Blacks already receive a massive, disproportionate amount of programs, both public and private, that they simply never use (but immigrants and non-black minorities do, as you mentioned.) If the majority of American blacks were at all capable of elevating their position in society, they've had the tools to do so for a while now. They don't because their ancestors were farm equipment, and IQ is heritable.

Additionally, if we're going to dole out reparations, does that mean we'll be compensating all the Chinese too? What about the Poles, Irish and Italians? Or do you only qualify if your lineage has been patently useless, stupid and incapable of helping itself for three generations?

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

Voters and debtors*.



Reparations are an inherently flawed concept. Blacks already receive a massive, disproportionate amount of programs, both public and private, that they simply never use (but immigrants and non-black minorities do, as you mentioned.) If the majority of American blacks were at all capable of elevating their position in society, they've had the tools to do so for a while now. They don't because their ancestors were farm equipment, and IQ is heritable.

Additionally, if we're going to dole out reparations, does that mean we'll be compensating all the Chinese too? What about the Poles, Irish and Italians? Or do you only qualify if your lineage has been patently useless, stupid and incapable of helping itself for three generations?

yeah the time for reparations was immediately after the Civil War, like how we gave reparations to people who had been in Japanese internment camps. the time has passed.

the other problem with it is that merely handing people a check doesn't save them. look at Native Americans who get those big casino checks. how many of them get off the rez and how many of them are spending it all on alcohol? it's why the welfare system will always exist. lot easier to hand out food stamps than it is to fix the broken school systems and lack of jobs (that the government caused through deindustrialization).

also, not to sound like a crazy trad, but the out of wedlock birth rate is a huge contributor for why poverty is getting and staying worse. and this is true for both white and blacks, btw, and most out of wedlock babies are white because most Americans are white. think about it. a married couple with three kids, the parents are paying for one apartment, one electric bill, one water bill, a woman who has three kids with three guys who all have three kids with three women, all that money is being split up across households. not to mention all the negatives of growing up in a single parent home that are harder to measure but have a noticeable effect on future income. the issue is that both middle class conservatives and liberals grow up in environments that promote in-wedlock child rearing and don't understand that neither abstinence only sex ed nor free condoms are going to make poor people engage in responsible sexual behavior and child rearing choices again.

btw, when I mean environments that promote in-wedlock child rearing, I don't necessarily mean that you're hearing screeds about the evils of being a single mother at church every week, but merely that the majority of adults you know got married before having children and stay married, and having children young is frowned upon, which is true for middle class liberals.

 

[crocodilian]

the other problem with it is that merely handing people a check doesn't save them. look at Native Americans who get those big casino checks. how many of them get off the rez and how many of them are spending it all on alcohol?

Quite a few younger-generation natives leave to become contributing members of society, actually; so much so that most tribes cite a brain drain. But those same casinos and reimbursements of land also contribute to a never-ending slew of lazy, useless, inebriated people who figure they can receive welfare forever as 'compensation' for ancient sleights.

There's really no similar drive in black communities. Being a stupid nigger is either treated as normal or glorified.

also, not to sound like a crazy trad, but the out of wedlock birth rate is a huge contributor for why poverty is getting and staying worse. and this is true for both white and blacks, btw, and most out of wedlock babies are white because most Americans are white. think about it. a married couple with three kids, the parents are paying for one apartment, one electric bill, one water bill, a woman who has three kids with three guys who all have three kids with three women, all that money is being split up across households. not to mention all the negatives of growing up in a single parent home that are harder to measure but have a noticeable effect on future income. the issue is that both middle class conservatives and liberals grow up in environments that promote in-wedlock child rearing and don't understand that neither abstinence only sex ed nor free condoms are going to make poor people engage in responsible sexual behavior and child rearing choices again.

There's a pretty big wealth of data suggesting single-parent households are a chief creator of shitty human beings, but at the same time the situation you describe (a mother of 3 with three different fathers) is going to receive pretty substantial financing compensation thanks to child support laws. (Good luck Googling hard data on the topic, I found 10 entire pages of opinion articles crying about how racist the term "welfare queen" is.)

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

Quite a few younger-generation natives leave to become contributing members of society, actually; so much so that most tribes cite a brain drain. But those same casinos and reimbursements of land also contribute to a never-ending slew of lazy, useless, inebriated people who figure they can receive welfare forever as 'compensation' for ancient sleights.

There's really no similar drive in black communities. Being a stupid nigger is either treated as normal or glorified.



There's a pretty big wealth of data suggesting single-parent households are a chief creator of shitty human beings, but at the same time the situation you describe (a mother of 3 with three different fathers) is going to receive pretty substantial financing compensation thanks to child support laws. (Good luck Googling hard data on the topic, I found 10 entire pages of opinion articles crying about how racist the term "welfare queen" is.)

that's assuming the fathers actually pay up instead of working under the table to avoid child support, which is more common than you think.
and, the father who is paying child support to three different women is worse off than if he had three children with one woman whom he lived with (and was married to--while long term cohabitating relationships are stable in some western Euro. countries, they're not in the US).

but yeah, any way you slice it, single parent households aren't great, but I don't know what the solution is to get people to stop making them. which could be its own thread, really.

 

[Shoggoth]

Something brings to mind a man feeding others a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.

 

[Binary Code]

Something brings to mind a man feeding others a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.

There’s no need to outrun the bear, just your friend.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

The true reason is that after Communism failed to take hold in the First World (like Marx predicted it would), Communism had to transform. In the Third World (and Russia) it took on a more agrarian and nationalist character. In the First World, it instead shifted its focus from class conflict to destroying the things which create false consciousness, the societal superstructure which consists of things like race, sex, and religion. Creating equality in these was considered to be an important step to equality in general. This ties in with the Frankfurt School (what some edgy conservatives call Cultural Marxism).

After several generations, the original point of it was just kind of forgotten and it took on a life of its own, to where they're now focused on race/sex/religion/nation struggle for its own sake.

Non-Communist Leftists are, like always, pawns of Communist intellectuals.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

Cesar Chavez was talking about how the importation of virtual slave labor from Mexico was undercutting the American worker in the late 60s/early 70s (whenever that fruit boycott was). It's an old idea.