The Tumblr Files - Official Thread (Case I: Steven Universe) - An exposé on the media and people that destroyed the Internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
it seems like overnight, sodomites and “allies” of the kweer movement developed some kind of religious devotion to these uncanny fucks.
Yep. Subhuman Drag monsters reading to kids was suddenly fucking everywhere and it seemingly came out of nowhere. And it was pushed with such a giant force by the media and shitlibs.
 
it seems like overnight, sodomites and “allies” of the kweer movement developed some kind of religious devotion to these uncanny fucks.

It has to be an acquired, or movement-mandated taste. I hate this gay new religion.
You bet this has no grassroots ideals. Or as I would put it, years and years of teaching "it's okay to be a faggot" made it indeed to be a faggot, and injecting policies how it is "GREAT to be a faggot", you got this!
Yep. Subhuman Drag monsters reading to kids was suddenly fucking everywhere and it seemingly came out of nowhere. And it was pushed with such a giant force by the media and shitlibs.
Follow the money. There is always someone or "philanthropical foundations" financing it.
 
The sudden drag queen push is absolutely ideological, and that ideology is communism.

Drag is the thinnest end of the trans wedge, introducing people to the idea of "gender performance" as distinct from biological sex. It is an introduction - an initiation - into "living queerly." And what does queer mean, anyway? If we ask the father of Queer Theory, David Halperin, he tells us in his book "Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography" in 1995:

Unlike gay identity, which, though deliberately proclaimed in an act of affirmation, is nonetheless rooted in the positive fact of homosexual object-choice, queer identity need not be grounded in any positive truth or in any stable reality. As the very word implies, queerdoes not name some natural kind or refer to some determinate object; it acquires its meaning from its oppositional relation to the norm.
Queer is by definition whatever isat odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant. There is nothing in particular to which it necessarily refers. It is an identity without an essence. Queer, then, demarcates not a positivity but a positionality vis-a-vis the normative; a positionality that is not restricted to lesbians and gay men but is in fact available to anyone who is or who feels marginalized because of his or her sexual practices: it could include some married couples without children, for example, or even (who knows?) some married couples with children - with, perhaps, very naughty children.

"Queer," then, means nothing. Nothing except opposition to the status quo. One can, if they wish, draw conclusions about queerness' relationship to Gramsci and Marcuse and the "Problem of Reproduction" ('Capitalism's' tendency to "reproduce itself" by being functional, and so the moral obligation of communists to disrupt that functionality through those sites of reproduction; these being the family, the church, media, education, and law. Say, how many of those have you noticed getting real fucking queer lately?), but even that is unnecessary because we can look at queer theorists own statements on drag, specifically "drag pedagogy" . It "leaves a trail of glitter in the carpet [your children] that will never come out" and ultimately "makes revolution inevitable."

They're communists. They're always communists.
 
I kinda wonder if the push of drag queens into media (especially children's media) is a way to "apologize" or even "re-educate" for the "unflattering" gags cartoon characters of old did for yucks.
To me, it feels more like they needed an exaggerated stereotype to act as the "mascot" for the movement in the same way so many black characters in media post-BLM have the Killmonger cut or have something to do with rap/hip-hop.
 
Back