The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

[hambeerlyingnreed]

"popeyes chicken sandwich" trending on Pornhub is the best part of this thread. But why and how did that happen?!

 

[FishMonster]

With Tumblr now dead and irrelevant, I can only hope that Twitter suffers the same fate too.

SJW roaches will just evacuate and infest the next social media platform they find.

What would actually stop these faggots is if more websites stood up against their BS and banned their behavior like harassing people for not believing in the same politics/social justice as them.

 

[Cheetahman]

So what's the moral of this story? The people that project and bitch about these sorts of things a lot almost always turn out to be bigger hypocrites and also bigger pieces of shit themselves.

Uh-oh, bad news for Arctic Fox!

 

[School of Fish]

SJW roaches will just evacuate and infest the next social media platform they find.

What would actually stop these faggots is if more websites stood up against their BS and banned their behavior like harassing people for not believing in the same politics/social justice as them.

Which is why I support the concept of a decentralized Internet anyway. The thing I hate about centralized social media like Twitter is that they give way too much power to a very few people that will only listen to jobless dumbasses and losers that migrated from Tumblr too.

There's already traction for a decentralized Internet that's being gained with the rise of stuff like the Fediverse where people can now create their own 'Twitter' where people can post what they want without having the blue checkmarks and cancel culture dipshits jumping on them too.

So if anything, this just give even more reasons to use decentralized services and cut out big tech from one's life too.

 

[Captain Hastings Official]

OP, I'm sure you mean well, but this thread's inevitable fate will be to serve as a battleground between trollshielding actual pedos, and lolcow 'pedo hunters' angry that their trollshield's been taken away.

So, good job making a honeypot thread.

 

[Least Concern]

I feel like we as a SOCIETY have come to a place where social media has made it so easy to insult people en masse and in such a hyperbolic manner that some words are starting to lose their meaning, at least in the context of the Internet. If person A calls person B a "racist" on Twitter, what's the odds that person B has actually done or advocated for race-based bigotry compared to the odds that person B just voted for the wrong politician? You can't trust that the word actually means what it's supposed to mean anymore. Same for "sexist" or "homophobe" or any number of slurs, and "pedo" is certainly one of them. How many people who get called pedophiles on Twitter actually have a persistent sexual desire for children? I'm guessing very few. Maybe this thing was also happening a lot before the rise of social media sites, but I don't remember it being that way.

 

[Freedom Fries]

Hmm. IDK if this sort of thing fit here, but while we're talking about pedo crusaders, failed inquisitors also come to mind. I'm reminded of that time Andy Warski and Ethan Ralph (very callously and to drive views) tried to out some kind of alleged pedo ring and potentially accidentally tipped them off and looked at underage girls themselves (if any of that was even real). I'm sure there's similar examples and worse of someone totally innocent being super incompetently accused (didn't that just happen in the recently made then featured "smug" egirl weeb thread?).

Maybe this angle is worth perusing, or maybe you're just into lolis you sick freak. Perhaps the "ara ara" people can fix you. Lolicons seem to fear ara ara.

 

[The Reaper]

Do you have links to where they might group up, like a subreddit or a Discord which they specifically focus on being anti-loli/pedo crusaders? I don't think this is a bad idea as right now we are seeing the people push porn bans and how cowish some of them are, but if its a community watch thread I just want to see more about the community. Right now it just feels very disconnected, and its not really a community-just a bunch of people who are up their own ass.

I know that 4chan has a problem with this as well as anons will derail threads completely unrelated to call people pedophiles for posting artwork. Sometimes its ridiculous too, like decrying anons who post LoL or Blizzard characters that are dwarves or halflings and calling them pedophiles. The characters are clearly of age... they're just short.

 

[peanus weenus]

I wish this thread to be successful, but too many people share similar sentiments here on Kiwifarms. Who knows, the guy who posted about wanting to fuck a Lucky Star cartoon character might be the next epic lolcow.

 

[Pizza Time]

It's funny you brought up Sakimi-chan in the OP but used the small amount of drama about the Melony picture and not the absolute shit show that was the Nezuko picture.

Tweet - Archive

Spoiler: What the character looks like in the anime

She drew a clearly aged up adult version of a 14 year old character and people lost their shit, calling her a pedophile and trying to get her canceled (lol good luck with that). The popular argument was aging up an underage character to draw lewds of them was predatory or some stupid shit like that.

Anyway, I agree with OP. I'm not super into loli or anything but it's all fictional and stylized so much it can't be compared to real CP. In my mind, jerking off to a cartoon child is as wrong as jerking off to rape porn, take that as you will. All the dumb twats on twitter who think they're morally righteous for calling artists pedos are either pedos themselves or under 18 and thus don't have opinions that matter anyway.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

I guarentee you that all these pedo hunters adore Big Mouth unironically

 

[I Love Beef]

I'm not going to lie, I am going to have to agree on some sentiments with @peanus weenus and @The Reaper here, even though I am with perspective and evidence of my own. Taking down the anime morality squad apologists is going to probably take a whole lot more than just making a thread about them on Kiwifarms. I mean hell, I tried to make a post about how this shit all got started, and I had to delete it because it was a history lesson with TL;DR.

I can sum it up, but the main point is that the Twitter Anti-Moe&Loli Morality Purism Squads have history and origins stemming even further than just Tumblr, and they are the result of American ass end anime fan diehard faggotry that goes back as far as the 1990s, and the cultural dearth of an art style that has not made a constructive as well as strong founded and embracing industry and community of artists and creators since it has taken foot here for about 30 years. The latter has origins stemming from old fag weeaboo hipster faggots who claimed that Sailor Moon and everything cutesy back in the 1990s that "wasn't cool or mature" to egotistic faggots was
"the bane of anime as a whole" and Anime News Network Writer Zac Bertschy (among others) being one of these hipster faggots who has long dictated and influenced a lot of fan behavior with his writing and viewpoints for a good decade, including getting a "hardcore sex loli manga" canned (when it wasn't) and used his site as a mouthpiece for his shithead views like CNN, and the former helps show why Japan is so "superior" in terms of animation and sequential art; not because of there being a lot of so called "master artists", but from the fact that their industry generates a community which has its own thriving populace of creators and artists whose efforts come to breed respect, dedication, responsibility, and workmanship for what they do, and helps weed out fakes and hipsters better than cosplay and convention going. This, combined with so many other things, (like yes Gamergate and the whole LGBT acceptance thing with its aftermath) has lead up to a bunch of white trash weeaboo whiners whose only form of constructive activity is RRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEing at the internet through Twitter and being baizuo faggots at Japanese mangaka.

I will say this however; keep this thread up, and keep growing it. As many have said, it's a fucking clown world at this point, and there's a need for laughing at the idiots of civilization. PS, @Secret Asshole has a post on the "Is Drawn Child Pornography (Loli) Bad?" thread, and it sums up everything you need to know about childfuckers. I'd suggest you read it.

'Bad' is a difficult quandary.

If we're talking morally, most people's fetishes are probably morally fucking terrible. Such as rape fetishes and things of that nature. People are even sexually attracted to violent rapists, serial killers and murderers. Its called Hybristophilia (there's a name for everything). So yeah, its morally terrible as any paraphilia or fetish.

Now bad as in actual real world harmful? No.

I've written a lot about pedophiles and have avoided this topic, but I guess I'll throw my hat into the ring as someone whose had the unfortunate experience on researching pedophiles and sexual criminality.

Firstly, there is no evidence that this art causes pedophiles to offend. Pedophiles will always offend and will get off on children in ways that you or I could not imagine. There was a Slate article where a pedophile was babysitting (horrifying) a young girl (under 10) and she was doing her ballerina moves. It got him so turned on he had to go to the bathroom and masturbate. I had to know this, now you do too. So pedophiles will fantasize in situations where we would never even imagine it. Also, pedophiles always offend. I don't believe in the existence of so-called virtuous pedophiles. If anything, consuming this basically gives a buffer period where they aren't harming real children or consuming child pornography. But in the end, I believe it is an inevitability. Whether five years or fifty, they will offend. They will have fantasies about every day children they see. This is of no influence one way or the other.

Secondly, loli/shota don't really do it for them as they're highly stylized art forms that don't depict reality. You might think that a highly sexualized loli who understands sex and consent would be a dream for a pedo. Hate to say it, but no. Pedophiles want the mind and body of a child. They're like vampires who consume that innocence. So the 3,500 year old loli dragon vampire succubus doesn't appeal. They want actual children. Sometimes the gender doesn't even matter, as some pedophiles molest indiscriminately. As long as they're pre-pubescent and children. I mean we're talking about monsters on the same level as serial killers who basically destroy children. They trade real children like trading cards. And that is what they crave the most. Simply put, they are not satisfied with fiction. Pedos are not even satisfied with women who look like children in porn. Girls who are 20 but look extremely young do exist. The thing is, they're not children. They're not after a mind any more mature than basically 12 or 14. They may say that or think that, but don't ever believe a word these faggots utter. The only thing you should believe is their death rattle after you put a bullet in their fucking skull.

Thirdly, pedophiles are notoriously manipulative and sociopathic. Which is why they're untreatable. They want everyone who consumes this to believe themselves to be pedophiles. In reality, there's no such thing as drawn child pornography. Child porn is illegal because it: Enriches organized crime. Most child porn these days is either produced or distributed by criminals. Harms actual children. Most children in child porn are either dead or victims of incest and human trafficking. Consuming child porn perpetuates abuse, torture and death. Which is why we have laws against it. A drawing cannot be harmed or do harm. No matter how much you believe it to be true. And pedophiles want you to believe it. Because they want every single person they can get. So pedos who say this made them pedophiles can't be trusted, because you can't trust a singular word any of these motherfuckers say. Pedophiles will do anything to normalize their behavior, any excuse in the book. Which is why studies by them and on them should be read very, very carefully. They'll say its a sexual orientation or that every male is actually a closeted pedophile since we all used to fuck kids when our maximum age was like 27. Anything to justify their pathology. Most studies on pedophiles basically have this disclaimer that pedophiles are manipulative and that their results are questionable. The one thing for sure is they're manipulative sociopaths who want to destroy and hurt children. They will do anything to justify it as not harmful, excepting taking responsibility. That's one thing you can count on a pedophile to never do.

PSS, Merry Christmas everyone.

 

[Daughter of Cernunnos]

Reminds me of the anti-MAP community on Tumblr.

 

[School of Fish]

It's funny you brought up Sakimi-chan in the OP but used the small amount of drama about the Melony picture and not the absolute shit show that was the Nezuko picture.

View attachment 1066813
Tweet - Archive

Spoiler: What the character looks like in the anime

She drew a clearly aged up adult version of a 14 year old character and people lost their shit, calling her a pedophile and trying to get her canceled (lol good luck with that). The popular argument was aging up an underage character to draw lewds of them was predatory or some stupid shit like that.

Anyway, I agree with OP. I'm not super into loli or anything but it's all fictional and stylized so much it can't be compared to real CP. In my mind, jerking off to a cartoon child is as wrong as jerking off to rape porn, take that as you will. All the dumb twats on twitter who think they're morally righteous for calling artists pedos are either pedos themselves or under 18 and thus don't have opinions that matter anyway.

Oh I remember that shitshow. I get the feeling that people that bash and start lynch mobs towards the artists that draw underaged characters (whether those said characters are either still underaged or is one of those 'how may they look like when they become fully grown' type of artwork) are probably pedophiles themselves.

It's just like watching those gay bashing Christians on how they preach that all gays need to be put into a concentration camp because to them they are committing something 'immoral' and how it goes against the teachings of the Bible only for many of them to pretty much end up being exposed as a bunch of pedophiles and even gay themselves which is every Catholic priest that gets caught, every scam artist televangelist, every cult leader such as Jim Jones, and every hypocritical religious politician that does this too.

 

[Isaac Cox]

So these are the same people that will call you a bigot for not championing 9 year old boys in drag getting fondled at pride. Right?

 

[peanus weenus]

So these are the same people that will call you a bigot for not championing 9 year old boys in drag getting fondled at pride. Right?

They're the same people who jerk off to shota porn/shipping without any irony.
Meanwhile whenever a girl is involved they will bring out a calculator and compare a frog age to human age using logic loopholes to claim a 3 years old frog holding a girl is child porn.

 

[Revo]

Idk, if these people are secretly weebs in denial/self hating weebs. If they're, then there's article on ED dedicated for them.

 

[Atatata]

When it comes to communities, there's r/lolitary.

There was also the whole situation surrounding the webcomic Ava's Demon where they tried to cancel the author for letting a friend make smut featuring her characters, and then the author tried to dox the wrong person and got shat on. It was pretty exceptional all around.

 

[BlazikenLover]

When it comes to communities, there's r/lolitary.

There was also the whole situation surrounding the webcomic Ava's Demon where they tried to cancel the author for letting a friend make smut featuring her characters, and then the author tried to dox the wrong person and got shat on. It was pretty exceptional all around.

The author is the same person who paid to have Muffet added to Undertale, which is why I've heard about the drama to begin with: people lamenting Muffet wouldn't be in deltarune because the character owner was a REEE PEDO

 

[Antique Rice]

The author is the same person who paid to have Muffet added to Undertale, which is why I've heard about the drama to begin with: people lamenting Muffet wouldn't be in deltarune because the character owner was a REEE PEDO

I never heard about that one. I do remember people losing their shit over that terrible So Sorry character because the designer was a feeder furry.