I don't know if I'm going to follow this thread or not but I think it reams of hypocrisy when the loli-crusader niche on twitter go absolutely apeshit over drawings of characters they claim are canonically <18 but then call me racist when I don't think Ariel should be a nigger, or tell me that the Raise of Reysism trilogy is justified in making Luke an attempted nephew murdering deranged teet suckling hobo.
It seems to me like characters are plastic when it's convenient for them, but then set in canonical stone when it is similarly convenient for them. I wouldn't care one way or the other if it actually
was one way or the other, but it isn't.
If THIS is 100% justified because "lol they're just characters, they're not real, they can be any race, why do you care"
View attachment 5109804
Then "The cartoon girl is just a million year old maid from another dimension with A cups, why do you care, it's not real, it's just artistic liberty" is a similarly valid argument for lolifags, or neither argument is valid but they won't concede that nigrofying red-heads is wrong, so I don't see any reason why lolifags should concede that their faggy weebshit is wrong either.
I am not a lolifag, this was just a random thought I had while reading this thread.